Cost-benefit analysis of psychosomatic therapy in asthma

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(86)90047-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The effectiveness of psychosomatic therapy for asthma patients is difficult to prove. We tried to solve this problem in a new way by means of a cost-benefit analysis. To draw up such an analysis. we selected 22 patients capable of working out of a total of 57 patients with asthma bronchiale at the Heidelberg Medical Hospital, who were interested in participating for one year in a psychosomatic coping group therapy. These 22 patients were divided into two groups. The distribution of the relevant individual parameters in both groups was similar. We subjected the patients to three medical and psychodiagnostic examination: one before treatment was started, a second after the first year of treatment and a third one and a half years later. Additional data were gathered from health insurance organisations and General Practitioners. Despite the bad prognoses of our patients, those treated, when compared to the untreated patients, had a significant reduction in the number of working days lost and a considerable decrease in the number of working days hospitalized. The savings resulting from these reductions were compared with the sum expended for group therapy; we found a cost-benefit ratio of 1:5. These results indicate that a cost-benefit analysis may be very helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of some psychosomatic treatment techniques. Moreover, coping group therapy completes the medical standard therapy of patients with bronchial asthma and is thus a means of reducing the high medical treatment costs of asthma patients.

References (27)

  • J Groen et al.

    Experiences with and results of group psychotherapy in patients with bronchial asthma

    J Psychosom Res

    (1960)
  • RP McCombs et al.

    Myths, morbidity and mortality in Asthma

    J Am Med Ass

    (1979)
  • UH Cegla

    Sozialmedicinische Bedeutung des allergischen Asthma bronchiale unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des berufsbedingten Asthma

    Pharmakotherapie

    (1981)
  • AOK
  • OP Schmidt et al.

    Sozialmedizinische Aspekte bei Atemwegskrankheiten

  • JF Dirks et al.

    Panicfear in asthma: rehospitalization following intensive long-term treatment

    Psychosom Med

    (1978)
  • R Kinsman et al.

    Noncompliance to prescribed as needed (PRN) medication use in asthma: usage patterns and patient characteristics

    J Psychosom Res

    (1980)
  • RS Lazarus

    Psychological Stress and the Coping Process

    (1965)
  • RH Moos

    Coping with Physical Illness

    (1977)
  • E Heim

    Coping oder Anpassungsvorgänge in der psychosomatischen Medizini

    Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal

    (1979)
  • HC Deter et al.

    Elements and effective mechanisms by medical psychosomatic treatment of asthma patients

  • A Heigl-Evers et al.

    Interaktionelle Gruppenpsychotherapie

  • Cited by (24)

    • Psychosocial factors and adherence to treatment advice in childhood atopic dermatitis

      2001, Journal of Investigative Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Education through provision of information alone has been found to be relatively ineffective as a therapeutic intervention in bronchial asthma (Gibson et al, 2000). Psychosomatic and behavioral interventions should be integrated into any patient education/information package in order to reinforce the effect (Deter, 1986;Ehlers et al, 1995). To strengthen the universality of our conclusion, this kind of research should be undertaken in different types of hospitals and clinics with a range of differently motivated patients, and in different countries from a cross-cultural point of view.

    • Is asthma self-management cost-effective?

      1997, Patient Education and Counseling
    • A self-management program for adult asthma. Part II: Cost-benefit analysis

      1995, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text