Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tuberculosis in an Area Bordering East London: Significant Local Variations when Compared to National Data

  • BRIEF REPORT
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

From September 1996 to June 1997, in an area bordering East London, we prospectively collected epidemiological, clinical and microbiological data on all patients with newly diagnosed culture-positive tuberculosis and compared these to national data based on notifications. The significant differences were that tuberculosis was diagnoses almost exclusively in non-Caucasian patients (42/47 [89%]) and that there was a high percentage of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (27/47 [57%]) including four cases of tuberculous meningitis and five cases of osteomyelitis. We also observed that 19/27 (70%) of patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis had normal chest X-rays, 3/17 (18%) sub-Saharan Africans were HIV antibody-positive and drug resistance strains were isolated from sic sub-Saharan Africans and one Caucasian. Figures for treatment failures and mortality compared favorably to national averages at 6 months. National data do not accurately reflect local epidemiology and clinical presentations. Hospital-based surveillance and promoting awareness of local differences is essential to prevent delayed diagnosis, inappropriate management and poor clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: December 7, 1999 · Accepted: January 11, 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melzer, M., Storring, R. & Bagg, L. Tuberculosis in an Area Bordering East London: Significant Local Variations when Compared to National Data. Infection 28, 103–105 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s150100050055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s150100050055

Navigation