Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma is a primary tumor of the pleura that is mainly due to asbestos exposure. To study the relationship between mesothelioma and occupational asbestos exposure in France, two case–control studies (A and B) were conducted. A substantial difference in the attributable risk in the population (ARp) was observed among men: 44.5% (95% CI: [32.6–56.4]) in study A and 83.2% (95% CI: [76.8–89.6]) in study B. As different exposure assessment expert methods were used, the main objective of this work was to re-estimate the ARp men in two case–control studies according to a common standardized exposure assessment by using a Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) and to assess the role of subjects’ selection. The initial observed ARp difference was maintained: 36.3% (95% CI: [24.3–50.3]) in study A and 69.7% (95% CI: [51.7–83.2]) in study B. Further investigations highlighted the potential selection bias introduced in both studies, especially among controls. The ARp could be underestimated in study A and overestimated in study B. After weighting subjects according to distribution of socio-economic status in the general population for controls and according to distribution of socio-economic status of cases registered by the French National Mesothelioma Surveillance Program, re-estimated ARp values were 52.4% in study A and 70.2% in study B. These results provide additional information to describe the relationship between pleural mesothelioma and occupational asbestos exposure, but also confirm the importance of subjects’ recruitment in case control studies, particularly control selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ARp :
-
Attributable risk in the population
- CEI:
-
Cumulative exposure index
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- f/ml:
-
Fibers per milliliter
- f/ml-years:
-
Fibers per milliliter years
- ISCO:
-
International standard classification of occupations edition 1968
- ISIC:
-
Industrial classification of all economic activities revision 2
- JEM:
-
Job exposure matrix
- PNSM:
-
French national mesothelioma surveillance program
References
Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Ind Med. 1960;17:260–71.
Hodgson JT, Darnton A. The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000;44(8):565–601.
Iwatsubo Y, Pairon JC, Boutin C, Menard O, Massin N, Caillaud D, et al. Pleural mesothelioma: dose-response relation at low levels of asbestos exposure in a French population-based case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(2):133–42.
Goldberg M, Imbernon E, Rolland P, Gilg Soit Ilg A, Saves M, de Quillacq A, et al. The French national mesothelioma surveillance program. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(6):390–5.
Hsieh CC, Walter SD. The effect of non-differential exposure misclassification on estimates of the attributable and prevented fraction. Stat Med. 1988;7(10):1073–85.
Wacholder S, Benichou J, Heineman EF, Hartge P, Hoover RN. Attributable risk: advantages of a broad definition of exposure. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140(4):303–9.
Fritschi L, Nadon L, Benke G, Lakhani R, Latreille B, Parent ME, et al. Validation of expert assessment of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43(5):519–22.
International Standard Classification of Occupations. Genève: International labour organization. 1968.
International Standard Industrial Classification of all Economic Activities (Revision 2). New york: United States. 1975.
Goldberg M, Kromhout H, Guenel P, Fletcher AC, Gerin M, Glass DC, et al. Job exposure matrices in industry. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(Suppl 2):S10–5.
Imbernon E, Goldberg M, Spyckerell Y, Bonenfant S, Fournier B. Utilisation d’une matrice emplois-exposition pour l’identification des expositions professionnelles à l’amiante. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2004;52(1):7–17.
Orlowski E, Pohlabeln H, Berrino F, Ahrens W, Bolm-Audorff U, Grossgarten K, et al. Retrospective assessment of asbestos exposure–II. At the job level: complementarity of job-specific questionnaire and job exposure matrices. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(Suppl 2):S96–105.
Audignon-Durand S, Rolland P, Orlowski E, Ducamp S, Brochard P, Goldberg M. Evalutil : une base de données d’évaluation des expositions professionnelles aux fibres. Info Respir. 2006;72:15–6.
Bruzzi P, Green S, Byar D, Brinton L, Schairer C. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(5):904–14.
Cox C. Model-based estimation of the attributable risk in case-control and cohort studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2006;15(6):611–25.
Siemiatycki J, Boffetta P. Invited commentary: is it possible to investigate the quantitative relation between asbestos and mesothelioma in a community-based study? Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(2):143–7.
Bouyer J, Dardenne J, Hemon D. Performance of odds ratios obtained with a job-exposure matrix and individual exposure assessment with special reference to misclassification errors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995;21(4):265–71.
Baumgarten M, Siemiatycki J, Gibbs GW. Validity of work histories obtained by interview for epidemiologic purposes. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118(4):583–91.
Bond GG, Bodner KM, Sobel W, Shellenberger RJ, Flores GH. Validation of work histories obtained from interviews. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(2):343–51.
Bourbonnais R, Meyer F, Theriault G. Validity of self reported work history. Br J Ind Med. 1988;45(1):29–32.
Eskenazi B, Pearson K. Validation of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing occupational and environmental exposures of pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(5):1117–29.
Pershagen G, Axelson OA. A validation of questionnaire information on occupational exposure and smoking. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1982;8(1):24–8.
Stewart WF, Tonascia JA, Matanoski GM. The validity of questionnaire-reported work history in live respondents. J Occup Med. 1987;29(10):795–800.
Pilorget C, Imbernon E, Goldberg M, Bonenfant S, Spyckerelle Y, Fournier B, et al. Evaluation of the quality of coding of job episodes collected by self questionnaires among French retired men for use in a job-exposure matrix. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(6):438–43.
Ben-Shlomo Y, Markowe H, Shipley M, Marmot MG. Stroke risk from alcohol consumption using different control groups. Stroke. 1992;23(8):1093–8.
Goldberg M, Luce D. The health impact of nonoccupational exposure to asbestos: what do we know? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832f9bee.
Agudo A, Gonzalez CA, Bleda MJ, Ramirez J, Hernandez S, Lopez F, et al. Occupation and risk of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a case-control study in Spain. Am J Ind Med. 2000;37(2):159–68.
Howel D, Arblaster L, Swinburne L, Schweiger M, Renvoize E, Hatton P. Routes of asbestos exposure and the development of mesothelioma in an English region. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54(6):403–9.
Rake C, Gilham C, Hatch J, Darnton A, Hodgson J, Peto J. Occupational, domestic and environmental mesothelioma risks in the British population: a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(7):1175–83.
Rees D, Goodman K, Fourie E, Chapman R, Blignaut C, Bachmann MO, et al. Asbestos exposure and mesothelioma in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1999;89(6):627–34.
Rodelsperger K, Jockel KH, Pohlabeln H, Romer W, Woitowitz HJ. Asbestos and man-made vitreous fibers as risk factors for diffuse malignant mesothelioma: results from a German hospital-based case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39(3):262–75.
Spirtas R, Heineman EF, Bernstein L, Beebe GW, Keehn RJ, Stark A, et al. Malignant mesothelioma: attributable risk of asbestos exposure. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51(12):804–11.
Acknowledgments
The authors of this study thank the patients and their next of kin, the physicians and pathologists who made these two studies possible. They also thank R. Cooke for his careful reading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacourt, A., Rolland, P., Gramond, C. et al. Attributable risk in men in two French case-control studies on mesothelioma and asbestos. Eur J Epidemiol 25, 799–806 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9502-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9502-0