Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma

  • Pneumology
  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In children with asthma, twice daily administration of salmeterol 25 μg, salmeterol 50 μg and salbutamol 200 μg were compared in two, 3-month, double-blind, parallel group studies, one using metered dose inhalers (MDIs), the other using dry powder inhalers (Diskhaler, DPIs). Both studies were continued for a further 9 months during which time exacerbation rates, lung function at the clinic and adverse events were monitored. Similarities in design and methodology of the two studies justified a combined analysis. Eight hundred and forty-seven asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 (mean 10.1) years, requiring inhaled beta2-agonist treatment were randomised to treatment. After a 2 week run-in when all bronchodilator therapy was withdrawn, 279 patients received salmeterol 25 μg bd, 290 patients salmeterol 50 μg bd and 278 patients salbutamol 200 μg bd. After 3 months' treatment the change from baseline in daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was significantly greater with salmeterol 50 μg bd than with salbutamol 200 μg bd (P<0.001). Salmeterol 50 μg bd was also significantly better than salmeterol 25 μg bd at improving mean morning PEF (P=0.017) but both treatments had a similar effect on evening PEF. Analysis of variance showed an interaction between baseline PEF less than 100% predicted normal value and treatment outcome. Analysis of this sub-set of patients with lower lung function revealed similar results to the total population although the improvements in PEF from baseline were greater. Data from both studies, showed that the improvement in lung function was maintained throughout 12 months' treatment. Patients receiving salmeterol 50 μg bd had significantly more symptom-free nights (P<0.01) and a higher percentage of rescue bronchodilator-free days (P=0.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was evenly distributed between the three treatment groups and there was no evidence of any change in the rate of occurrence of exacerbations over the 12 month period. Adverse events were no different across treatment groups or across age groups and were primarily related to the patients' disease state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI :

confidence intervals

DPI :

dry powder inhaler

FEV 1 :

forced expiratory volume in 1 s

MDI :

metered dose inhaler

PEF :

peak expiratory flow

References

  1. Britton MG, Earnshaw JS, Palmer JBD (1992) A twelve-month comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J 5: 1062–1067

    Google Scholar 

  2. Green CP, Price JF (1992) Prevention of exercise-induced asthma by inhaled salmeterol xinafoate. Arch Dis Child 67: 1014–1017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guidelines On The Management Of Asthma (1993) Thorax 48: [Suppl] S1-S243

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kemp JP, Meltzer EO (1990) Beta2 adrenergic agonists-oral or aerosol for the treatment of asthma. J Asthma 27 (3): 149–157

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lundback B, Rawlinson DW Palmer JBD (1993) Twelve month comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol as dry powder formulations in asthmatic patients. Thorax 48: 148–153

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nasser SSM Rees PJ (1993) Theophylline. Current thoughts on the risks and beenfits of its use in asthma. Drug Safety 8 (1): 12–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nathan RA (1992) Beta2 agonist therapy: Oral versus inhaled delivery. J Asthma 29 (1): 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pocock SJ (1983) 3 In clinical trials. A practical approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sears MR, Taylor DR, Print CG, et al (1990) Regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment in bronchial asthma. Lancet 336: 1391–1396

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simons F, Soni N, Watson W, Becker A (1992) Bronchodilator and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol in young patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 90: 840–846

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spitzer WO, Suissa S, Ernst P, et al (1992) The use of beta-agonists and the risk of death and near death from asthma. N Engl J Med 326 (8): 501–506

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stallaert R, Prins J (1991) A comparison of the metered dose inhaler and dry powder Diskhaler inhaler formulations of salmeterol in mild to moderate asthmatics. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 121 [Suppl 40/II]: 23, P2062

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Schayk CP, Dompeling E, Herwaarden CLA van, et al (1991) Bronchodilator treatment in moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis: continuous or on demand? A randomised controlled study. BMJ 303: 1426–1431

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verberne A, Lenney W, Kerrebijn K (1991) A three-way cross-over study comparing twice daily dosing of salmeterol 25 μg and 50 μg with placebo in children with mild to moderate reversible airways disease (abstract). Am Rev Respir Dis 143: A20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Warner JO, Gotz M, Landau LI, Levison H, Milner AD, Pedersen S (1989) Management Of Asthma: A Consensus Statement. Arch Dis Child 64: 1065–1079

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lenney, W., Pedersen, S., Boner, A.L. et al. Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma. Eur J Pediatr 154, 983–990 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01958642

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01958642

Key words

Navigation