Article types and word count
|
> Full papers
|
> Case reports
|
> Pulmonary Puzzles (Case Reports)
|
> Reviews
|
> Letter to the editor (original research)
|
> Correspondence
|
> Editorials
|
> Images in Thorax
|
> Lung alerts
|
|
> Supplements
|
|
The word count excludes the title page, abstract, tables, acknowledgements and contributions and the references.
Also see detailed instructions for online submission and formatting your manuscript.
|
|
Full papers
Full papers should follow the basic structure of abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, references, and tables and figures as appropriate. They should not normally exceed 250 words for the abstract, 3000 words for the content and include no more than 35 references. There is an online data repository for extra information.
|
Back to top
|
|
Case reports
Case reports should not exceed 850 words with one table or illustration, a short unstructured abstract, and 10 references. We recommend an author limit of 5, but we can consider more if authors can show significant contributions and/or give compelling or specific reasons. We do ask that authors indicate that they have obtained patient consent.
|
Back to top
|
|
Pulmonary Puzzles (Case Reports)
This category is for unusual cases that make an educational point. Since the aim of these articles is to stimulate the reader to think about the case, the title should be ambiguous and not give away the final diagnosis immediately.
Pulmonary Puzzles will appear in two parts and should be submitted via Bench>Press using the article type ‘case reports’. The first part should contain a very brief clinical introduction to a case (maximum 250 words) followed by an image and a question designed to stimulate the reader to think about what the image shows. The legend should not indicate the diagnosis but should simply describe the nature of the image. The second part (maximum 250 words) will appear later in the issue and should contain the answer. The answer should include a brief description of the key diagnostic features of the image, the outcome, and a teaching point. Pulmonary Pearls will not include more than 5 references.
The quality of the image must be at least 600dpi and in TIFF, JPEG or EPS format.
|
Back to top
|
|
Reviews
Although usually commissioned, we do occasionally accept unsolicited review articles. These should not normally exceed 4000 words.
|
Back to top
|
|
Letter to the editor (original research)
Research letters in Thorax are welcome and should be submitted via Bench>Press. These should not normally exceed 500 words, with one table or figure and should include no more than 5 references. Any additional submission information including methodology, data and tables can be placed in the on-line repository facility on the Thorax website.
|
Back to top
|
|
Correspondence
Letters in response to articles published in Thorax are welcome and should be submitted via Bench>Press. Correspondence must reach us by the end of the following calendar month (by the end of July, for letters referring to articles in the June print issue for example) and be a maximum of 400 words, with one figure or table and no more than 5 references. As for research letters, authors may also make use of the on-line repository facility for supplemental data.
|
Back to top
|
|
Editorials
Editorials are normally commissioned but the Editors may accept uncommissioned articles of this type.
|
Back to top
|
|
Images in Thorax
Our Images in thorax section consists of a case report of 100 words, a few learning points, a maximun of two figures, and two references. The images can be radiological, pathological or both. Thorax will cover the cost of printing pathological images in colour. We recommend an author limit of 5, but we can consider more if authors can show significant contributions and/or give compelling or specific reasons. We do ask that authors indicate that they have obtained patient consent.
|
Back to top
|
|
Lung Alerts
For information on being an author for a Lung Alert please contact one of the two Lung Alert editors directly, Dr Angshu Bhowmik (angshub{at}cheerful.com) and Dr John Hurst (jrhurst{at}lineone.net)
|
Back to top
|
Supplements
The BMJ Publishing Group journals are willing to consider publishing supplements to regular issues. Supplement proposals may be made at the request of:
- The journal editor, an editorial board member or a learned society may wish to organise a meeting, sponsorship may be sought and the proceedings published as a supplement.
- The journal editor, editorial board member or learned society may wish to commission a supplement on a particular theme or topic. Again, sponsorship may be sought.
- The BMJPG itself may have proposals for supplements where sponsorship may be necessary.
- A sponsoring organisation, often a pharmaceutical company or a charitable foundation, that wishes to arrange a meeting, the proceedings of which will be published as a supplement.
In all cases, it is vital that the journal’s integrity, independence and academic reputation is not compromised in any way.
For further information on criteria that must be fulfilled, download the supplements guidelines (PDF).
|
Back to top
|