Table 5

Comparison of change in 6MWD between intention to treat and per protocol analyses for each subgroup

Mean difference (95% CI)
9 week follow-up6 month follow-up
IPF
 ITT n=29/3231 (−5 to 66)0.9 (−36 to 38)
 PP Completion n=29/1526 (−14 to 67)−18 (−63 to 26)
 PP Progression n=29/1655 (13–97)15 (−30 to 60)
Asbestosis
 ITT n=11/1168 (10 to 124)92 (36 to 148)
 PP Completion n=11/1075 (19 to 132)93 (38 to148)
 PP Progression n=11/1075 (19 to 132)93 (38 to148)
CTD-ILD
 ITT n=12/113 (−53 to 60)21 (−35 to 77)
 PP Completion n=12/614 (−50 to 78)38 (−25 to 101)
 PP Progression n=12/614 (−50 to 78)38 (−25 to 101)
  • Values are mean difference (SE). Data are exercise group – control group. n=number of participants in usual care group/exercise training group for the corresponding analysis.

  • 6MWD, six-minute walk distance; CTD, connective tissue disease; ILD, interstitial lung disease; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; ITT, intention to treat; PP, per protocol.