TableĀ 4

Binary regression risk ratio (with 95% CI and p value) of achieving a minimum clinically important improvement in health status for IMD deprivation quintile relative to the reference group of least deprived IMD quintile for 3664 patients

IMD quintileUnadjusted risk ratio (95% CI)After adjusting for baseline health status score quartile and PR programme clustering effectsAfter adjusting for baseline health status score quartile, patient-reported MRC dyspnoea score at initial assessment and PR programme clustering effects
Q1 most deprived1.01 (0.92 to 1.10), p=0.880.91 (0.84 to 0.99), p=0.030.91 (0.84 to 0.99), p=0.03
Q21.07 (0.99 to 1.17), p=0.100.99 (0.93 to 1.06), p=0.830.99 (0.92 to 1.06), p=0.79
Q31.04 (0.96 to 1.13), p=0.370.98 (0.91 to 1.06), p=0.580.98 (0.91 to 1.05), p=0.56
Q40.98 (0.89 to 1.07), p=0.620.93 (0.86 to 1.01), p=0.080.93 (0.87 to 1.01), p=0.08
Q5 least deprivedReference risk ratio=1.00Reference risk ratio=1.00Reference risk ratio=1.00
Not known1.04 (0.86 to 1.25), p=0.700.98 (0.81 to 1.19), p=0.840.97 (0.80 to 1.18), p=0.75
  • IMD, Indices of Multiple Deprivation; MRC, Medical Research Council; PR, Pulmonary Rehabilitation.