Table 2

Direct and indirect effects of cured meat intake on worsening asthma symptoms between EGEA2 and EGEA3, using the marginal structural model (n=971)

No. stable or improved/worseningDirect effect* OR (95% CI)Indirect effect* OR (95% CI)
<1 s/w1–3.9 s/w≥4 s/w<1 s/w1–3.9 s/w≥4 s/w<1 s/w1–3.9 s/w≥4 s/w
All participants155/26370/92255/731.001.56 (0.93 to 2.61)1.76 (1.01 to 3.06)1.001.04 (1.00 to 1.09)1.07 (1.01 to 1.14)
Subgroups
Sex
 Men51/9184/37153/421.001.04 (0.43 to 2.50)1.31 (0.54 to 3.20)1.001.04 (0.96 to 1.12)1.06 (0.96 to 1.17)
 Women104/17186/55102/311.001.97 (1.03 to 3.77)2.00 (0.96 to 4.16)1.001.05 (1.00 to 1.11)1.09 (1.00 to 1.18)
Smoking
 Never87/12206/45113/361.001.61 (0.73 to 3.54)2.47 (1.03 to 5.92)1.001.08 (0.98 to 1.19)1.11 (0.99 to 1.24)
 Ever68/14162/47142/371.001.52 (0.76 to 3.06)1.25 (0.60 to 2.61)1.001.02 (0.99 to 1.04)1.05 (0.98 to 1.11)
Asthma
 Ever57/11135/49118/381.002.21 (1.00 to 4.88)2.16 (0.93 to 5.04)1.001.08 (1.00 to 1.16)1.13 (1.01 to 1.27)
 No98/15235/43137/351.001.27 (0.64 to 2.49)1.63 (0.80 to 3.33)1.001.02 (0.97 to 1.08)1.04 (0.97 to 1.11)
  • *For all participants, we adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, educational level, leisure-time physical activity, modified Western and prudent patterns, total energy intake, and asthma status at EGEA2; for subgroup analyses, we adjusted for all potential confounders except the stratifying variable.

  • s/w, serving/week.