Table 1

Characteristics of individual studies included in systematic review of discharge care bundles administered to patients with AECOPD

Study; country; designIntervention, comparison groups (n)Outcomes and resultsSignificant resultOverall risk of bias
Abad-Corpa et al;24 Spain; CCTCOPD discharge planning with care bundle (n=56),
 usual care (n=87)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: NR
  • Bundle: 43%; usual care: 47%; NS

Mortality (%); f/u: NR
  • Bundle: 13%; usual care: 20%; NS

QoL: SGRQ (mean, SD); f/u: 3 mo, 6 mo
  • Bundle (3 mo): 46.5±22.7; (6 mo): 6 mo: 46.7±23.3

  • Usual care: (3 mo): 46.7±21.9; (6 mo): 44.2±22.6; p=0.02*

YesHigh
Casas et al;25 Spain, Belgium; RCTCOPD discharge bundle within integrated care plan (n=65),
usual care (n=90)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 1 yr
  • Bundle: 23%; usual care: 29%; p=0.028*

Mortality (%); 1 yr
  • Bundle: 19%; usual care: 14%; p=0.67

Physician visits: (rate per patient/yr); 1 yr
  • Bundle: 18.4%; usual care: 16.6%; p=0.45

YesModerate
Jennings et al;29 USA; RCTCOPD discharge bundle (n=93),
usual care (n=79)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 30 d
  • Bundle: 19.3%; usual care: 22.7%; p=0.58

NoModerate
Lainscak et al;30 Slovenia; RCTCOPD discharge care bundle (n=118),
usual care (n=135)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 6 mo
  • Bundle: 31%; usual care: 44%; p=0.033*

Mortality (%); 6 mo
  • Bundle: 9.3%; usual care: 9.6%; p=0.93

QoL: SGRQ (mean, SD); 6 mo
  • Bundle: 55.4 (18.8)

  • Usual care: 53.8 (18.6); p=0.33

YesModerate
Linden and Butterworth;32 USA; RCTComponents of transitional care model at discharge (n=124),
usual care (n=131)
Hospital re-admissions (rate per person/time); f/u: 30 d, 90 d
  • Bundle (30 d): 0.218; usual care (30 d): 0.198; p=0.75

  • Bundle (90 d): 0.50; usual care (90 d): 0.55; p=0.613

ED returns (rate per person/time); 30 d, 90 d
  • Bundle (30 d): 0.129; usual care (30 d): 0.16; p=0.556

  • Bundle (90 d): 0.29; usual care (90 d): 0.26; p=0.761

Mortality (%); 90 d
  • Bundle: 3.2%; usual care: 11.5%; p=0.01*

YesModerate
Graham;26 UK; ITSCOPD discharge care planning period (n=nr),
no bundle period (previous year) (n=nr)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: nr
  • Bundle: 12.8%; no bundle: 14.9%; p=nr; per cent change: −14.10%

Mortality (%); f/u: 1 yr
  • Bundle: 6.19%; no bundle: 4.38%; p=nr

UnclearHigh
Laverty et al;31 UK; ITSCOPD discharge bundle (n=nr),
no bundle period (previous year) (n=nr)
Hospital re-admissions (mean annual, SD); f/u: 28, 90 d
  • Bundle (28 d): −5.3%; no bundle (28 d): 2.1%; p=0.01

  • Bundle (90 d): −1.3%; no bundle (28 d): 1.4%; p=0.26

YesHigh
Halpin et al;27 UK; BACOPD discharge care planning period (n=67),
no bundle period (n=257)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 30 d
  • Bundle: 18%; no bundle: 27%; p=nr; per cent change: −33%

UnclearHigh
Hopkinson et al;28 UK; BACOPD discharge bundle (n=94),
no bundle period (n=365)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 30 d
  • Bundle: 10.8%; no bundle: 16.4%; p=nr; per cent change: −34.1%

UnclearHigh
Mann et al;33 UK; BACOPD discharge bundle (n=nr),
no bundle period (n=nr)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 28 d
  • Bundle: 18%; no bundle: 25%; p=0.06; per cent change: −28%

NoHigh
Matthews et al;34 UK; BACOPD discharge bundle (n=nr),
no bundle period (n=nr)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 30 d
  • Bundle: 17.7%; no bundle: 23.2%; p=nr; per cent change: −23.4%

UnclearHigh
Seymour et al;35 UK; BACOPD discharge care planning period (n=103),
no bundle period (n=53)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 30 d, 3 mo
  • Bundle (30 d): 17.5%; no bundle: 34%; p=0.02; per cent change: −48.5%

  • Bundle (3 mo): 36.9%; no bundle: 52.8%; p=0.06; per cent change: −30.1%

YesHigh
Shorofsky et al;36 Canada; BACOPD discharge bundle (n=210),
no bundle period (n=nr)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 90 d, 1 yr
  • Bundle (90 d): 18.6%; no bundle: 32.2%; p=0.017*; per cent change: 90 d: −42.4%

  • Bundle (1 yr): 30.5%; no bundle: 61.9%; p=0.038*; per cent change: 1 yr: −50.7%

YesHigh
Yip et al;37 USA; BACOPD discharge care planning period (n=nr),
no bundle period (n=nr)
Hospital re-admissions (%); f/u: 30 d
  • Bundle: 21.5%; no bundle: 22.9%; p=0.1; per cent change: −6.11%

NoHigh
  • *Statistically significant difference.

  • AECOPD, an exacerbation of COPD; BA, before-and-after study; CCT, controlled clinical trial; d, day(s); ED, emergency department; f/u, follow-up; ITS, interrupted time series; mo, month(s); NR, not reported; NS, not significant; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SGRQ, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire; yr, year(s).