Table 1

Comparison of demographics between ARDS and at-risk patients who were undergoing oesophagectomy

ARDS (n=52)At risk (n=65)p Value
Male, n (%)30 (57)57 (87.6)<0.001
Age (years), mean (SD)61.3 (16.7)62.8 (10.8)0.560
Predisposing condition, n (%)Pneumonia 18 (35)
Other sepsis 24 (46)
Aortic aneurysm repair 3 (6)
Chest trauma 2 (3.8)
Pancreatitis 1 (1.9)
Transfusion-related lung injury 1 (1.9)
Other 3 (6)
Oesophagectomy 65 (100)n/a
LIS, median (IQR)2.75 (2.50–3.19)1.5 (1.0–2.0)<0.001
APACHE II median (IQR)24 (19–28)12 (8–14)<0.001
Worst P/F ratio during admission, mean (SD)14.9 (5.2)31.5 (9.9)<0.001
Hospital survival, n (%)16 (30.8)62 (95.4)<0.001
Length of hospital stay for survivors (days), median (IQR)35 (16–49)17 (10–28)0.025
  • Statistical tests used are χ2 t test where data is normally distributed and Kruskal–Wallis for non-parametric data.

  • APACHE, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; ratio of arterial oxygen tension to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Pao2:Fio2), arterial oxygen tension: fractional inspired oxygen; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; LIS, lung injury score.