Table 1

Patient demographic data

All (382)Belfast (95)Brompton (99)Leicester (79)Manchester (109)
Female (%)241 (63.1)56 (58.9)63 (63.6)45 (57.8)77 (70.6)p=0.259
Race, n (%)
 White346 (90.6)95 (100)82 (82.8)64 (81.0)105 (96.3)p<0.001
 Asian24 (6.3)09 (9.1)15 (19.0)0
 African10 (2.6)07 (7.1)03 (2.8)
 Unknown4 (1.0)01 (1.0)03 (2.8)
Age at first assessment at Difficult Asthma Service (n)44.9±13.7 (381)43.2±14.4 (95)43.0±13.1 (99)45.7±13.6 (78)47.5±13.4 (109)p=0.055
Age (years) at diagnosis of asthma (n)17 (3–35) (377)20 (2–39) (95)10 (2–27) (99)25 (5–43) (79)18 (4.25–33) (104)p=0.019
Height, m (n)1.66±0.096 (382)1.65±0.09 (95)1.68±1.0 (99)1.66±0.11 (79)1.65±1.0 (109)p=0.118
Weight, kg (n)81.2±19.9 (374)81.3±19.8 (95)83.8±18.3 (99)81.8±23.1 (71)78.3±19.2 (109)p=0.254
BMI (n)28 (24.3–32.4) (374)28 (25–34) (95)30 (25–32) (99)28.4 (24.4–34.5) (71)27 (24–31) (109)p=0.291
Smoking status
 Never233 (61.0)57 (60.0)69 (69.7)50 (63.3)57 (52.3)p=0.182
 Ex-smoker (years since stopped)114 (29.8) (8.97±8.15)27 (28.4) (11.0±9.92)25 (25.2) (9.64±6.72)24 (30.4) (10.35±8.26)38 (34.9) (5.55±6.35)
 Current smoker (%) (pack-years)22 (5.8) (16.12±11.62)9 (9.5) (16.8±13.4)2 (2.0) (9.0±11.3)5 (6.3) (16.4±15.6)6 (5.5) (18.2±8.01)
 Unknown13 (3.4)2 (2.1)3 (3.0)08 (7.3)
Working status
 Full time (%)151 (39.5)34 (35.8)33 (33.3)46 (58.2)38 (34.9)p<0.001
 Asthma-related not working (%)100 (26.2)16 (16.8)40 (40.4)9 (11.4)35 (32.1)
 Other cause for not working (%)104 (27.2)39 (41.0)15 (15.2)22 (27.8)28 (25.7)
 Part-time working due to asthma (%)12 (3.1)0 (0)10 (10.1)02 (1.8)
 Part-time working due to other cause (%)10 (2.6)2 (2.1)1 (1.0)1 (1.3)6 (5.5)
Unknown5 (1.3)4 (4.2)0 (0)1 (1.3)0
Work-related worsening of asthma (%)p=0.98
 Yes19 (5.0)4 (4.2)5 (5.0)4 (5.1)6 (5.5)
 No354 (92.7)89 (93.7)94 (95.0)69 (87.3)102 (93.6)
 Not recorded9 (2.3)2 (2.1)06 (7.6)1 (0.9)
  • Group data (mean±SD or median (IQR)) for all subjects are presented in column 2 followed by data for individual centres. Between-centre comparisons for continuous variables were made using one-way analysis of variance or Kruksal–Wallis test (for posthoc comparisons, see text) and for categorical variables using χ2 exact testing.

  • Significance was taken as p<0.01.

  • BMI, body mass index.