Table 5

Comparisons of results for the T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT assays, where both tests were undertaken, according to region of origin and presence of diagnosed co-morbidities

QFT-GITQFT-GITQFT-GIT
PositiveNegativeIndeterminate
African without co-morbities* (n=263)
T-SPOT.TB positive15 (6%)3 (1%)0 (0%)
T-SPOT.TB negative6 (2%)171 (65%)28 (11%)
T-SPOT.TB inconclusive3 (1%)32 (12%)5 (2%)
African with co-morbities (n=90)
T-SPOT.TB positive10 (11%)1 (1%)0 (0%)
T-SPOT.TB negative2 (2%)37 (41%)31 (34%)
T-SPOT.TB inconclusive0 (0%)6 (7%)3 (3%)
Asian (n=106)
T-SPOT.TB positive6 (6%)2 (2%)0 (0%)
T-SPOT.TB negative1 (1%)81 (76%)3 (3%)
T-SPOT.TB inconclusive2 (2%)11 (10%)0 (0%)
  • Diagnosed co-morbidities included malaria, hepatitis or helminth infection (schistosomiasis/strongyloides).

  • An inconclusive T-SPOT.TB result was one that was either indeterminate or where the test was not completed.

  • Comparisons are based on the McNemar test for paired proportions of T-SPOT.TB vs QFT-GIT:

  • * Proportions positive: 7% vs 9%, p=0.1. Proportions not completed or indeterminate: 15% vs 13%, p=0.4.

  • Proportions positive: 12% vs 13%, p>0.9. Proportions not completed or indeterminate: 10% vs 38%, p=0.0001.

  • Proportions positive: 8% vs 8%, p>0.9. Proportions not completed or indeterminate: 12% vs 3%, p=0.02.