SNP | Busselton | WATCH |
Genotype: coefficient (95% CI), p value | p Value* | |
rs9568221 | AG: 0.76 (0.55 to 1.05), p = 0.09 | 0.34 |
GG: 0.43 (0.07 to 2.50), p = 0.35 | ||
rs9568222 | AT: 1.35 (0.92 to 2.03), p = 0.14 | –† |
TT: 1.68 (0.18 to 2.79), p = 0.96 | ||
rs6561527 | AT: 0.89 (0.63 to 1.25), p = 0.53 | 0.93 |
TT: 1.70 (0.87 to 3.34), p = 0.11 | ||
rs9568227 | GA and AA: 1.26 (0.87 to 1.84), p = 0.21‡ | 0.88 |
rs2031532 | GA: 0.98 (0.77 to 1.25), p = 0.86 | 0.87 |
AA: 0.83 (0.58 to 1.20), p = 0.32 | ||
rs2247119 | CT: 0.99 (0.78 to 1.26), p = 0.98 | 0.60 |
CC: 1.11 (0.74 to 1.65), p = 0.62 | ||
rs9596127 | GT and TT: 1.12 (0.70 to 1.79), p = 0.62‡ | – |
rs9568232 | CT: 1.08 (0.76 to 1.52), p = 0.65 | – |
TT: 2.23 (0.19 to 25.2), p = 0.52 | ||
rs8000149 | TC: 1.013 (0.79 to 1.29), p = 0.91 | 0.69 |
CC: 0.82 (0.57 to 1.17), p = 0.29 | ||
rs17381926 | TC: 1.46 (0.93 to 2.28), p = 0.09 | – |
CC: 1.67 (0.97 to 2.84), p = 0.96 | ||
rs3765526 | CA: 1.02 (0.78 to 1.32), p = 0.87 | 0.54 |
AA: 0.93 (0.67 to 1.27), p = 0.64 | ||
rs17073051 | AG: 1.01 (0.77 to 1.31), p = 0.93 | 0.46 |
GG: 0.92 (0.67 to 1.27), p = 0.63 | ||
rs9526569 | TC: 0.99 (0.77 to 1.26), p = 0.94 | 0.90 |
CC: 0.83 (0.59 to 1.17), p = 0.30 | ||
rs1046295 | AG: 0.95 (0.73 to 1.24), p = 0.75 | 0.58 |
GG: 0.92 (0.67 to 1.26), p = 0.60 | ||
rs3794378 | AG: 1.07 (0.74 to 1.54), p = 0.69 | 0.96 |
GG: 1.22 (0.72 to 2.05), p = 0.44 | ||
rs9568238 | CT: 1.24 (0.90 to 1.70), p = 0.17 | 0.51 |
TT: 0.31 (0.05 to 1.66), p = 0.07 | ||
rs9562892 | CT: 1.28 (0.87 to 1.87), p = 0.19 | 0.45 |
TT: 0.18 (0.01 to 1.79), p = 0.14 | ||
rs1925742 | TC: 0.99 (0.79 to 1.26), p = 0.96 | 0.21 |
CC: 0.76 (0.50 to 1.13), p = 0.18 | ||
rs9535259 | GC: 0.82 (0.63 to 1.06), p = 0.13 | 0.58 |
CC: 0.72 (0.39 to 1.35), p = 0.32 |
*Only p values are shown here as transmission disequilibrium tests do not allow for estimations of odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
†Not tested due to low numbers of informative families to run the transmission disequilibrium test.
†The number of participants with minor homozygous genotypes was too small to allow comparison under a co-dominant model and have been examined instead under a dominant model.