Table 4 Effects of montelukast versus salmeterol as add-on therapy to ICS
Outcome measureStudy, montelukast effectEffectComment
ML+ICS effect measure; (SE) or [95% CI]Sa+ICS effect measure; (SE) or [95% CI]Difference between groups: Δ; (SE) or [95% CI]; p value
Symptom score (various scales)Ilowite 200428 43↓−0.48 (0.03*)−0.66 (0.03*)Δ = 0.18 [0.10, 0.26]Change from baseline (improvement  =  negative changes), mean
Nelson 200029 44 45 ↔−0.41 (0.03*)−0.49 (0.04*)p = 0.199
Symptom-free daysGrosclaude 200327↓↓73%82%OR = 1.66 p = 0.005Symptom-free days (% of all study days)
Ilowite 200428 43↓↓1.15 (0.08*)1.69 (0.08*)Δ = −0.54 [−0.76, −0.32]Symptom-free days/week; change from baseline (week 0 to 48), mean
Nelson 200029 44 45↓17%21%p = 0.759% symptom-free days; change from baseline (week 0 to 12), mean
Ringdal 200330 46 47↓↓39%50%OR = 1.32 [1.05, 1.65] p = 0.017% symptom-free days; change from baseline (week 0 to 12), median; OR: symptom-free days during study period
SAM40030 200326 48↓19%33%Δ = 13 [−2, 33] p = 0.064% symptom-free days, change from baseline to end of study, median
Symptom-/asthma-free nightsGrosclaude 200327↓↓87%93%OR = 1.96 p = 0.001Symptom-free nights (% of all study days)
Ringdal 200330 46 47↓↓71%79%OR = 1.28 [1.02, 1.61] p = 0.033% symptom-free nights; change from baseline (week 0 to 12), median; OR: symptom-free nights during study period
SAM40030 200326 48↓6%13%Δ = 13 [−2, 35] p = 0.055% symptom-free nights, change from baseline to end of study, median
Nocturnal awakeningsBjermer 200325 42↔−1.68 (0.06)−1.74 (0.06)Δ = 0.06 [−0.07, 0.20]Nights with awakenings/week, change from baseline, LS mean
Ilowite 200428 43↓↓−0.79 (0.05)−1.02 (0.05)Δ = 0.23 [0.10, 0.36]
ExacerbationsGrosclaude 200327↓↓1.540.96Reduction (Sa + ICS)  = 38% p = 0.001No of exacerbations during 12 week treatment phase, mean
Bjermer 200325 42†‡↔150 (20%)142 (19%)RR = 1.02 (0.82, 1.26)No of patients (%) with ⩾1 exacerbation
Ilowite 200428 43†§↓147 (20%)120 (17%)RR = 1.20 [0.96, 1.49]
Nelson 200029 44 45↓↓13 (6%)4 (2%)p = 0.031
Ringdal 200330 46 47↓↓54 (15%)34 (10%)p<0.05
HospitalisationBjermer 200325 42↔5 (<1%)7 (<1%)RR = 0.71 [0.21, 2.22]Hospitalisation was documented as a component of an exacerbation (Bjermer, Grosclaude, Ilowite, Nelson) or defined as a serious adverse event (Ringdal)
Grosclaude 200327↔00
Ilowite 200428 43↔3 (<1%)5 (<1%)RR = 0.59 [0.14, 2.45]
Nelson 200029 44 45↔00
Ringdal 200330 46 47↔2 (<1%)1 (<1%)na
Emergency treatmentBjermer 200325 42↔21 (3%)21 (3%)RR = 0.99 [0.55, 1.81]No of patients (%)
Ilowite 200428 43↔15 (2%)16 (2%)RR = 0.92 [0.46, 1.84]
Nelson 200029 44 45↔1 (<1%)0na
Additional visits to physicianBjermer 200325 42↔82 (11%)80 (11%)RR = 1.02 [0.76, 1.36]No of patients (%)
Ilowite 200428 43↓↓107 (15%)74 (10%)RR = 1.41 [1.07, 1.87]
Nelson 200029 44 45↓9 (4%)2 (<1%)na
Quality of lifeBjermer 200325 42↔0.71 (0.04)0.76 (0.04)Δ = −0.05 [−0.15, 0.06] p = 0.381AQLQ score (7 point scale), change from baseline, mean
Ilowite 200428 43 ↓↓0.78 (0.03)0.90 (0.03)Δ = −0.12 [−0.22, −0.02] p = 0.011
Satisfaction with treatmentRingdal 200330 46 47↓↓84%93%p<0.05% patients being (very) satisfied (assessed on a 5 point scale)
All adverse eventsBjermer 200325 42↔530 (71%)538 (72%)naNo of patients (%) with ⩾1 adverse event
Grosclaude 200327↔45 (35%)43 (35%)na
Ilowite 200428 43↔576 (78%)588 (81%)na
Nelson 200029 44 45↔119 (53%)117 (53%)na
Ringdal 200330 46 47↔170 (42%)176 (44%)na
SAM40030 200326 48↔21 (64%)19 (58%)na
Serious adverse eventsBjermer 200325 42¶↑↑34 (5%)55 (7%)p = 0.022No of patients (%) with ⩾1 serious adverse event
Ilowite 200428 43↔22 (3%)27 (4%)na
Nelson 200029 44 45↔2 (<1%)1 (<1%)na
Ringdal 200330 46 47↔7 (2%)4 (1%)na
SAM40030 200326 48↔02 (6%)na
Withdrawals due to adverse eventsBjermer 200325 42↔38 (5%)35 (5%)naNo of patients (%) withdrawn due to adverse events
Grosclaude 200327↓5 (4%)1 (<1%)na
Ilowite 200428 43↑18 (2%)31 (4%)p = 0.06
Nelson 200029 44 45↔4 (2%)6 (3%)na
Ringdal 200330 46 47↔19 (5%)13 (4%)na
SAM40030 200326 48↔4 (12%)2 (6%)na
  • ↑↑Montelukast better than salmeterol (with statistical significance); ↑montelukast better than salmeterol (without statistical significance); ↔montelukast comparable to salmeterol; ↓montelukast worse than salmeterol (without statistical significance); and ↓↓montelukast worse than salmeterol (with statistical significance).

  • *Reported as SD in publication; †confirmatory analysis; ‡non-inferiority trial; non-inferiority demonstrated; §non-inferiority trial; non-inferiority not demonstrated; and ¶death of one patient (“death with a severe asthma attack”) in the salmeterol/fluticasone group 15 days after the start of treatment, reported by the investigator as being possibly related to the study drug.

  • AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LS mean, least square mean; ML, montelukast; na, not available; RR, relative risk; Sa, salmeterol; SE, standard error.