Table 3

 Relative risk (with 95% confidence interval) of lung cancer for men and women in different quintiles of lung function

Quintile 1Quintile 2Quintile 3Quintile 4Quintile 5
All data were merged using a fixed effects model because there was no significant heterogeneity in data across the studies (p>0.10).
Men
    Hole102.53 (1.68 to 3.82)1.93 (1.27 to 2.94)1.80 (1.17 to 2.77)1.36 (0.86 to 2.16)1.00
    Kuller113.56 (1.02 to 12.43)2.44 (1.17 to 5.05)2.80 (1.32 to 5.93)0.50 (0.11 to 2.34)1.00
    Mannino123.16 (1.20 to 8.33)1.03 (0.35 to 3.06)1.11 (0.35 to 3.46)0.94 (0.29 to 3.10)1.00
    Van Den Eeden131.86 (1.32 to 2.64)1.60 (1.35 to 1.90)1.45 (1.20 to 1.75)1.34 (1.04 to 1.72)1.00
    Pooled summary2.23 (1.73 to 2.86)1.67 (1.42 to 1.93)1.54 (1.30 to 1.82)1.30 (1.05 to 1.62)1.00
Women
    Hole104.39 (1.86 to 10.38)4.14 (1.73 to 9.87)4.01 (1.68 to 9.58)3.63 (1.51 to 8.76)1.00
    Mannino125.99 (0.75 to 47.94)8.58 (1.09 to 67.36)8.76 (1.09 to 70.11)1.08 (0.07 to 17.29)1.00
    Van Den Eeden131.95 (0.32 to 11.70)1.45 (0.27 to 7.69)1.80 (0.52 to 6.30)1.55 (0.41 to 5.81)1.00
    Pooled summary3.97 (1.93 to 8.25)3.71 (1.80 to 7.69)3.46 (1.75 to 6.75)2.64 (1.30 to 5.31)1.00
Pooled summary for men and women2.36 (1.88 to 3.00)1.72 (1.48 to 1.99)1.62 (1.38 to 1.90)1.38 (1.13 to 1.70)1.00