Subject |
Mean of 5 standard attempts |
Mean of 5 manipulated attempts |
Relative increase (%) |
Best of 5 standard attempts |
Best of 5 manipulated attempts |
Relative increase (%) |
1 | 509 | 688 | 35 | 520 | 8001-150 | 54 |
2 | 500 | 634 | 27 | 520 | 660 | 27 |
3 | 613 | 710 | 16 | 625 | 8001-150 | 28 |
4 | 516 | 712 | 38 | 590 | 8001-150 | 36 |
5 | 490 | 512 | 4 | 510 | 540 | 6 |
6 | 526 | 730 | 39 | 530 | 8001-150 | 51 |
7 | 628 | 760 | 21 | 640 | 8001-150 | 25 |
8 | 548 | 537 | −2 | 575 | 550 | −4 |
9 | 414 | 688 | 66 | 420 | 780 | 86 |
10 | 439 | 602 | 37 | 450 | 8001-150 | 78 |
11 | 402 | 432 | 7 | 410 | 480 | 17 |
12 | 522 | 650 | 24 | 540 | 8001-150 | 48 |
13 | 468 | 616 | 32 | 480 | 750 | 56 |
14 | 432 | 594 | 37 | 440 | 8001-150 | 82 |
15 | 294 | 408 | 39 | 350 | 440 | 26 |
↵1-150 These subjects produced several peak flow measurements beyond 800 (top of the scale) which were recorded as 800 for the purpose of calculating the mean recording and relative increase.