Chest
Volume 85, Issue 6, June 1984, Pages 751-758
Journal home page for Chest

The Measurement of Dyspnea: Contents, Interobserver Agreement, and Physiologic Correlates of Two New Clinical Indexes

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.85.6.751Get rights and content

To improve the clinical measurement of dyspnea, we developed a baseline dyspnea index that rated the severity of dyspnea at a single state and a transition dyspnea index that denoted changes from that baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. At the baseline state, dyspnea was rated in five grades from 0 (severe) to 4 (unimpaired) for each category. The ratings for each of the three categories were added to form a baseline focal score (range, 0 to 12). At the transition period, changes in dyspnea were rated by seven grades, ranging from –3 (major deterioration), to +3 (major improvement). The ratings for each of the three categories were added to form a transition focal score (range, –9 to +9). In 38 patients tested with respiratory disease, interobserver agreement was highly satisfactory for both indexes. The baseline focal score had the highest correlation (r = 0.60; P < 0.001) with the 12-minute walking distance (12 MW), while significant, but lower, correlations existed for lung function. For the transition focal score, there was a significant correlation only with the 12 MW (r = 0.33; p = 0.04). These results indicate that dyspnea can receive a direct clinical rating that provides important information not disclosed by customary physiologic tests.

Section snippets

Construction of the Indexes

Each index contains an arbitrary rating for three categories: functional impairment, magnitude of task needed to evoke dyspnea, and magnitude of effort needed to evoke dyspnea. At the initial or baseline evaluation, the patient’s condition was rated from 0 (severe), to 4 (unimpaired), for each category. The ratings on each of the three categories were added to form a baseline focal score (range, 0 to 12). The lower the total score, the worse the severity of dyspnea.

The transitions or changes in

RESULTS

Observer agreement using the dyspnea indexes is shown in Table 1. For the two technicians, agreement was 92 percent with the baseline focal scores and 90 percent with the transition focal scores. The percentage agreement for the three categories of the two indexes ranged from 85 percent to 94 percent. Values for kw were .70 for the baseline focal scores and .63 for the transition focal scores; this represented substantial agreement.27 The kw values of agreement for the three categories of the

DISCUSSION

In this study two clinical indexes were developed to measure dyspnea. In contrast to previously described methods, such as the four-or five-point rating scale7, 12 or the visual analog scale,23 the baseline and transition dyspnea indexes consisted of three categories which are major factors affecting the development of dyspnea: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. Our data demonstrated that a rating based on magnitude of task alone does not indicate the full

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The writers thank J. Denos, G. Orlowski, D. Papenfoth, and K. Weigel for their technical assistance and for applying the indexes to grade dyspnea in this study.

REFERENCES (36)

  • BurrowsB et al.

    Chronic obstructive lung disease: II

    Relationship of clinical and physiologic findings to the severity of airway obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1965)
  • SukumalchantraY et al.

    Prognosis of patients with COPD after hospitalization for acute ventilatory failure, a three-year follow-up study

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1966)
  • FletcherCM et al.

    The significance of respiratory symptoms and the diagnosis of chronic bronchitis in a working population

    Br Med J

    (1959)
  • McGavinCR et al.

    Dyspnoea, disability, and distance walked: comparison of estimates of exercise performance in respiratory disease

    Br Med J

    (1978)
  • LeinerGC et al.

    Dyspnea and pulmonary function tests

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1965)
  • KillianKJ et al.

    Magnitude scaling of externally added loads to breathing

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1981)
  • GottfriedSB et al.

    Perception of changes in airflow resistance in obstructive pulmonary disorders

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1981)
  • Committee on research into chronic bronchitis

    Instructions for use of the questionnaire on respiratory symptoms

    (1966)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by the Medical Research Service, Veterans Administration, The Commonwealth Fund, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant 6309.

    View full text