Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 118, Issue 4, June 2004, Pages 247-255
Public Health

Why do primary school children smoke? A longitudinal analysis of predictors of smoking uptake during pre-adolescence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The objectives of this longitudinal study were to determine the prevalence of smoking among primary school children in Liverpool, and to identify the predictors of experimentation with cigarettes during pre-adolescence.

A cohort of children (n=270) completed questionnaires that elicited patterns of child smoking behaviour and children's experiences of smoking in their families and communities each year between the ages of 9 and 11 years. Parents also completed questionnaires. Children's first trials with cigarettes and repeated smoking were reported. The independent variables measured were socio-economic status, familial and peer smoking, and intentions to smoke. By age 11, 27% of children had tried smoking, 12% had smoked repeatedly and 3% were smoking regularly. Variables measured at age 9 predicting experimentation with cigarettes by age 11 were male gender (P=0.041), paternal smoking (P=0.001), fraternal smoking (P=0.017), a best friend who smoked (P=0.026) and knowing someone with a smoking-related disease (P=0.006). Intentions to smoke at age 9 did not predict smoking at age 11 (P>0.05). In univariate analyses, child smoking was also associated with maternal smoking (P=0.002 at age 11), living in a low-income household (P<0.001 at age 10) and living in a deprived area (P=0.025 at age 11).

Early smoking presents a considerable challenge to health promoters, not least because it is socially patterned. The interventions required must tackle the structural and social pressures that shape smoking behaviour during childhood.

Introduction

Adult smoking rates in the UK have been falling for some time,1 but smoking prevalence rates among children have remained relatively stable over the past two decades.2., 3. Four hundred and fifty British children take up smoking every day,4 and a recent national survey found that 10% of young people aged 11–15 years were regular smokers.2 Most smokers begin to smoke regularly during their teenage years, and it is relatively unusual to take up smoking during adulthood. By the age of 16 years (the minimum legal age to purchase tobacco in the UK), seven in 10 children have tried smoking. Tobacco use by children is of particular public health concern because the earlier a child begins to smoke, the less likely they are to quit the habit as an adult, and the more likely it is that they will die prematurely from a smoking-related disease.5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10. Smoking by children is also of concern for policy makers because ‘gateway theory’ suggests that early use of tobacco predicts illegal drug taking during adolescence and adulthood.11., 12. Smoking among adults is inversely correlated with occupational class, with higher smoking rates among people in manual than in non-manual occupations.13., 14. Thus, smoking is associated with social inequalities and, as a major cause of disease and premature death, smoking serves to create and deepen inequalities in health.

Although it is unusual for regular smoking patterns to be established before the teenage years, regular smoking is preceded by experimentation with cigarettes, and this may occur at primary school or even before children start school.15., 16., 17., 18., 19. Rates of smoking experimentation peak between the ages of 9 and 12 years for boys and 10 and 13 years for girls, therefore pre-adolescence is a key period during which to study smoking uptake.4

Although many children try smoking for the first time during pre-adolescence, little longitudinal research has been carried out with this age group. Instead, studies of young people and tobacco have tended to focus on adolescence, and have concentrated on measuring prevalence rates. Although numerous cross-sectional studies have examined the factors that are associated with smoking uptake among young people, few longitudinal studies have explored why some children experiment with cigarettes. As becoming a smoker is part of a process, longitudinal studies can explain sequences of events and examine the ways in which different variables operate over time. To date, no longitudinal research of this kind into smoking onset has been carried out in the UK. However, some prospective longitudinal research has been carried out with pre-adolescents in New Zealand and the USA. These studies found that smoking during pre-adolescence was predicted by early experimentation,20 low academic achievement,21 positive perceptions of smokers,22 and parental and peer smoking.23., 24.

This article presents data from the pre-adolescent phase (age 9 in 1999 to age 11 in 2001) of the Liverpool Longitudinal Study of Smoking (LLSS). This unique, prospective longitudinal study has tracked a cohort of children throughout their years at primary school, from reception class (age 5) through to Year 6 (age 11), and has used a variety of quantitative and qualitative methods to explore children's experiences of smoking in their homes and communities.25., 26., 27., 28. This article presents quantitative analysis of the associations between socio-economic variables and early smoking. We identified which factors at age 9 predicted smoking at age 11.

Section snippets

Methods

The LLSS is a prospective longitudinal study carried out in six primary schools in Liverpool, in the North West of England. The schools were chosen at the start of the study in 1995 to represent the range of social conditions found in the city of Liverpool on the basis of key socio-economic indicators.25 Data were collected from the cohort of approximately 270 children and their parents each year. Headteachers and parents gave written consent, and assent to participate was also given by the

Results

At the time of pre-adolescence, 53% of the cohort were female, and 7% of the children belonged to minority ethnic groups. Liverpool is a city characterized by pockets of deprivation, and five of the six schools in which the study was carried out were located in some of the least affluent areas in the UK. Over half of the cohort lived in low-income households, and 82% lived in the most deprived quartile in the North West as calculated using Townsend's indices of deprivation.

As would be expected,

Discussion

The LLSS is a unique longitudinal study that used quantitative and qualitative methods in triangulation to track the smoking behaviour of a cohort of Liverpool primary school children during pre-adolescence. This wave of the research found that rates of smoking experimentation within the cohort increased significantly during pre-adolescence, from 8% at age 9 to 27% at age 11. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that having a best friend or a brother who smoked at age 9 predicted

Acknowledgements

The Liverpool Longitudinal Study of Smoking is funded by the Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation. The research team would also like to express their gratitude to the pupils, parents, staff and headteachers of the six Liverpool primary schools who took part in the study. We would also like to thank Peter Bundred for converting postcode data into deprivation indices, and Martyn Barrett for his advice on how to ask young children about ethnicity.

References (49)

  • A McNeill

    Why children start smoking: the need for a comprehensive tobacco control policy

    Br J Addict

    (1992)
  • W Doherty et al.

    Family functioning and parental smoking as predictors of adolescent cigarette use: a six-year prospective study

    J Fam Psychol

    (1994)
  • L Eckhardt et al.

    A longitudinal analysis of adolescent smoking and its correlates

    J Sch Health

    (1994)
  • C Jackson et al.

    The early use of alcohol and tobacco: its relation to children's competence and parents' behaviour

    Am J Public Health

    (1997)
  • G Balch

    Exploring perceptions of smoking cessation among high school smokers: input and feedback from focus groups

    Prev Med

    (1998)
  • D Kandel et al.

    Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: further evidence for the gateway theory

    J Stud Alcohol

    (1992)
  • D Kandel et al.

    Maternal smoking during pregnancy and smoking by adolescent daughters

    Am J Public Health

    (1994)
  • D Lader et al.

    Smoking-related behaviour and attitudes, 2000

    (2001)
  • K Richardson et al.

    Smoking and health inequalities

    (2001)
  • F Schneider et al.

    Adolescent–preadolescent differences in beliefs and attitudes about cigarette smoking

    J Psychol

    (1974)
  • A Charlton

    Young children with smoking parents. Are they at risk?

    Midwife, Health Visitor Community Nurse

    (1987)
  • M Isohanni et al.

    Determinants of teenage smoking, with special reference to non-standard family background

    Br J Addict

    (1991)
  • L Michell et al.

    The social meaning of smoking for boys in a residential school for children with emotional and behavioural disorders

    Health Educ J

    (1993)
  • W Stanton et al.

    School achievement as an independent predictor of smoking in childhood and early adolescence

    Health Educ J

    (1991)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Predictors of the Onset of Cigarette Smoking: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Population-Based Studies in Youth

      2016, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Articles rejected at earlier phases are available upon request to the authors. The final search yielded 53 articles for data extraction.34–86 Because the review was limited to longitudinal prospective studies not involving interventions, several elements of the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICO) model87,88 did not apply.

    • Family characteristics and health behaviour as antecedents of school nurses' concerns about adolescents' health and development: A path model approach

      2015, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among socio-economic factors, only paternal education was directly associated with school nurses’ concerns. The results obtained confirmed those from previous studies indicating that parental smoking is associated with smoking in both boys and girls (Rajan et al., 2003; Milton et al., 2004; Otten et al., 2007). The results presented here also strengthen earlier findings indicating that smoking in girls was particularly associated with maternal smoking (cf. Griesbach et al., 2003; Kestilä et al., 2006; Ashley et al., 2008).

    • Overestimation of peer smoking prevalence predicts smoking initiation among primary school students in Hong Kong

      2011, Journal of Adolescent Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, the effects of becoming correct and becoming incorrect on smoking initiation were investigated in two separate models. Logistic regression yielded odds ratios (OR) for smoking adjusting for potential confounders [7] and school effects in cross-sectional and prospective analyses. Among 2,171 students (mean age: 8 years, 52% boys), 4.4% at baseline and 5.5% at follow-up had ever smoked.

    • A parallel process model of the development of positive smoking expectancies and smoking behavior during early adolescence in Caucasian and African American girls

      2010, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, positive, but not negative, smoking expectancies predict smoking behavior in early adolescence (Copeland et al., 2007). Thus, we focused on positive expectancies, and examined selected covariates: in the biological domain, pubertal maturation (e.g., Westerling, Andrews, Hampson, & Peterson, 2008); in the psychological domain, conduct problems (e.g., Otten, Wanner, Vitaro, & Engels, 2009) and depression (e.g., Fleming, Mason, Mazza, Abbott, & Catalano, 2008); and in the social domain, parental smoking (e.g., Milton et al., 2004) and supervision (e.g., Westerling et al., 2008). We used a parallel process model to study the development of positive tobacco-related expectancies and tobacco use in a cohort of early adolescent girls.

    • Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2011, Thorax
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, sensitivity analyses restricted to studies which adjusted for at least three of the specified confounder effect had similar marginal effects on the pooled estimate (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.24, 12 studies). Any household smoking (usually defined as either living with a smoker or that an adult smokes in the home) increased the risk by 1.92 (95% CI 1.70 to 2.16, 12 studies; I2=80%; figure 8 in online supplement).5 7 43 50 52 59 64 67 78–81 No significant differences in effect size were seen between the subgroup analyses for quality or definition for smoking status (test for subgroup differences, p=0.86 and p-Q.17, respectively).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text