Article Text

other Versions


Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: does the current definition need revisiting?
  1. Nicholas Hart1,
  2. Swapna Mandal1,
  3. Ari Manuel2,
  4. Babak Mokhlesi3,
  5. Jean-Louis Pépin4,
  6. Amanda Piper5,
  7. John R Stradling6
  1. 1Lane Fox Unit and Critical Care, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Oriel College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  3. 3Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  4. 4University Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France; Inserm, U1042, Grenoble University Hospital, Sleep Laboratory and Physiology Department, Grenoble, France
  5. 5Sleep Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
  6. 6Adult Respiratory Sleep Disorders, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ari Manuel, Oriel College, University of Oxford, Oriel Square, Oxford OX1 4EW, UK; ari.manuel{at}

Statistics from

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) has been conventionally (and to some extent arbitrarily) defined by the combination of obesity (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2), daytime hypercapnia (arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) ≥45 mm Hg or 6 kPa) during wakefulness, and usually (but not always) the presence of ‘sleep disordered breathing’, such as obstructive sleep apnoea, rapid eye movement sleep hypoventilation or both.1 The survival curve for untreated OHS is significantly reduced compared with the non-obese,2 and so early identification and treatment for these patients is likely to be beneficial. Little is currently known about the true prevalence of OHS in ambulatory obese individuals, with estimates range from 0.3–0.4% of the general population,3 to around 30% of hospitalised patients with a BMI >35 kg/m2.2 The combined medical costs associated with treatment of obesity associated diseases are estimated to increase by $48–66 billion/year in the USA and by £1·9–2 billion/year in the UK by 2030,4 making OHS an increasingly common and expensive problem. The American Medical Association recently announced that obesity is now considered a ‘disease’, a step which may improve patient access to obesity treatments and increase funding into obesity research.

The current definition, based as it is on a single one-off measurement of PaCO2, seems to us to be too restrictive; PaCO2 is not constant and, rather like blood pressure where the white coat effect is well recognised, is subject to a variety of influences. For example, patient anxiety over arterial sampling is likely to ‘falsely’ lower the PaCO2, and many obese subjects hypoventilate overnight, but are able to return their PaCO2 to within normal levels a short time following awakening.5 Calculated arterial standard bicarbonate (HCO3) level from a conventional blood gas machine, in the absence of another influence on metabolic acid-base status, is a longer term guide to 24-h ventilation and, in some ways, can be viewed as the ‘HbA1c’ of CO2 levels because it represents the renal retention of HCO3 that occurs in response to hypercapnia. Our combined experience in this area is that there are many patients with significant nocturnal hypoventilation who, during the day, have normal-to-high PaCO2 levels, but have alkalotic (>7.40) pH values, and thus raised standard HCO3 (or base excess) levels. Serum venous bicarbonate concentration, which is increased by a currently raised PaCO2 level and any renal compensation, has also previously been described to be a useful screening tool in identifying patients with OHS in a group of obese patients with sleep disordered breathing6 and might be used as a simpler alternative for screening.

In our view, the use of PaCO2 alone in the definition of OHS may miss early disease, if used in isolation. Clearly delineating the OHS population is a key issue, for appropriate care, and for conducting unbiased clinical studies and determination of phenotypes associated with poor prognosis within the obese population. We propose that the definition of OHS should be based on obesity, plus a PaCO2 ≥45 mm Hg (6 kPa) OR an arterial base excess >3 mmol/L OR a standard HCO3 >27 mmol/L (in the absence of another cause for a metabolic alkalosis). Clearly, the BMI, the exact levels of PaCO2, and now the HCO3, used in the definition of OHS are relatively arbitrary thresholds, and may benefit from refinement; but the addition of a raised arterial HCO3 criterion seems to add value to the identification of this increasing problem.


View Abstract


  • Contributors NH, SM, AM, BM, J-LP, AP and JRS all prepared, edited and reviewed the manuscript. JRS is the senior author for this submission.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles