Statistics from Altmetric.com
Volume and pressure-limited (‘lung-protective’) mechanical ventilation decreases short-term mortality in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). This multicentre prospective cohort study from the USA evaluated the association of lung-protective mechanical ventilation with a 2-year survival period in patients with ALI.
The study included 485 mechanically ventilated patients with ALI diagnosed according to the American-European Consensus criteria. After onset of ALI, twice-daily records of ventilator settings were measured yielding 6240 settings for evaluation. Those with tidal volumes ≤6.5 ml/kg and a plateau pressure ≤30 cm H2O were deemed ‘adherent’ to lung-protective ventilation. In total, only 41% of ventilator settings recorded were adherent. Four hundred and seventeen patients (86%) received 50% or less of their ventilator-settings adherent, and 180 (37%) never received any settings adherent.
Overall, 311 patients (64%) died during the 2 years after onset of ALI. Survival was independently associated with several covariates, including age, co-morbidity and organ failure scores. After adjustment for total duration of mechanical ventilation and covariates for each additional adherent ventilator setting, the risk of mortality over 2 years decreased by 3% (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.99, p=0.002). Statistical modelling estimated an absolute risk reduction in 2-year mortality of 4% (95% CI 0.8% to 7.2%, p=0.012) for 50% ventilator adherence and 7.8% (95% CI 1.6% to 14%, p=0.011) for 100% adherence.
Lung-protective ventilation still appears to be under-utilised in clinical practice. Although in this prospective study we cannot be certain that all possible confounding variables were accounted for, there may also be an association between non-adherence to lung-protective ventilation and 2-year mortality.
▶ Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, et al. Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012;344:e2124.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.