Article Text

other Versions

PDF

Correspondence
GWAS in lung disease
  1. Robert P Young1,2,
  2. Raewyn J Hopkins1,2
  1. 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  2. 2School of Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robert P Young, PO Box 26161, Epsom 1344, Auckland, New Zealand; roberty{at}adhb.govt.nz

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We read with interest the recent article ‘Genome-wide association studies in lung disease’ by Artigas et al.1 While we agree that a greater understanding of the biological pathways underlying disease development and progression (susceptibility) will be a major outcome from these genetic epidemiological studies, we suggest other benefits may also stem from this research.

The genetics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer represent unique models for the genetics of lung disease because they result in the main from a ‘single’ measurable and preventable environmental exposure (cigarette smoking). That we can stratify for smoking exposure in these genetic association studies is critical to disease gene discovery and study design, as many of the underlying ‘susceptibility genes’ only become clinically evident (ie, expressed as disease) after several decades of daily smoking exposure. In studies of lung cancer, where cases and controls are carefully stratified by smoking exposure it appears the genes relevant in smokers are distinct to those in non-smokers.2 3 When smokers are stratified by smoking exposure and lung function, it appears that genes implicated in lung cancer overlap with those implicated in COPD.3 This might explain why COPD predates lung cancer in up to 80% of cases, conferring a two- to sixfold greater risk compared with smokers with normal lung function. By stratifying for COPD (lung function), this approach has also identified genes conferring a ‘protective’ effect in lung cancer (ie, found in healthy or resistant smokers).3 Until cigarette smoking is eradicated, understanding the biology of resistance to smoking may be of greater clinical relevance than that of susceptibility. Specifically, if the pathogenetic processes that protect smokers from COPD also protect them from lung cancer,3 4 then chemo-preventive approaches might target these pathways. Of more immediate clinical utility is the use of genetic data (from a cheek swab) to help identify smokers at the greatest risk of COPD and/or lung cancer.3 To this end, we and others have combined genetic data with known clinical variables (eg, COPD) to develop risk models for lung cancer.3 Preliminary studies suggest such gene-based risk assessment might help motivate some smokers to quit smoking3 5 and may help target those most in need of CT screening.3 We conclude that COPD and lung cancer GWAS studies have much to contribute to respiratory medicine notably the possible basis of differential responsiveness of smokers to smoking exposure, the link between COPD and lung cancer, and the potential to develop new strategies in prevention and early diagnosis.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Funding RPY, and the funding of his research, has been supported by grants from the University of Auckland, Health Research Council of New Zealand and Synergenz BioSciences Ltd.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.