Background: Tuberculous pleuritis remains the commonest cause of exudative effusions in areas with a high prevalence of tuberculosis and histological and/or microbiological confirmation on pleural tissue is the gold standard for its diagnosis. Uncertainty remains regarding the choice of closed pleural biopsy needles.
Objectives: This prospective study compared ultrasound-assisted Abrams and Tru-cut needle biopsies with regards to their diagnostic yield for pleural tuberculosis.
Methods: We enrolled 89 patients (38.7+/-16.7 years; 54 males) with pleural effusions and a clinical suspicion of tuberculosis. Transthoracic ultrasound was performed on all, whereafter patients were randomly assigned to undergo either four or more Abrams needle biopsies followed by four or more Tru-cut needle biopsies or vice versa. Medical thoracoscopy was performed on cases with nondiagnostic closed biopsies. Histological and/or microbiological proof of tuberculosis on any pleural specimen was considered the gold standard for pleural tuberculosis.
Results: Pleural tuberculosis was diagnosed in 66 patients, alternative diagnoses established in 20 patients and 3 remained undiagnosed. Pleural biopsy specimens obtained with Abrams needles contained pleural tissue in 81 patients (91.0%) and were diagnostic for TB in 54 patients (sensitivity=81.8%), whereas Tru-cut needle biopsy specimens only contained pleural tissue in 70 patients (78.7%, p=0.015) and were diagnostic in 43 patients (sensitivity=65.2%, p=0.022).
Conclusions: US-assisted pleural biopsies performed with an Abrams needle are more likely to contain pleura and have a significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity for pleural tuberculosis.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.