Article Text

other Versions

PDF

Comparison of inhaled mannitol, daily rhDNase, and a combination of both in children with cystic fibrosis: a randomised trial
  1. Caro Carlyle Minasian1,*,
  2. Colin Wallis2,
  3. Chris Metcalfe3,
  4. Andrew Bush1
  1. 1 Royal Brompton Hospital & Imperial College, London, United Kingdom;
  2. 2 Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
  3. 3 University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  1. Correspondence to: Caro Carlyle Minasian, Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital & Imperial College, London, Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom; carominasian{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Background: Osmotic agents, such as inhaled dry powder mannitol may increase mucociliary clearance (MCC) by rehydrating the airway-surface liquid (ASL) and thus act as disease-modifying treatments in cystic fibrosis (CF). This is the first therapeutic trial of inhaled mannitol in children with CF. We have compared it to human recombinant deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase), the current best established mucolytic therapy.

Methods: 38 children were recruited to an open crossover study. Subjects underwent an initial bronchial provocation challenge with dry powder mannitol. Those children with a negative challenge were randomly allocated to one of three consecutive twelve-week treatment blocks (inhaled mannitol alone, nebulised rhDNase alone and mannitol + rhDNase). The primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). A number of secondary outcome measures were also studied.

Results: Twenty children completed the study. Bronchoconstriction and cough associated with mannitol administration contributed to the high attrition rate. The mean increase in FEV1 following 12 weeks of treatment was 0.11 litres (6.7%) (p=0.055) for mannitol alone, 0.12 litres (7.2%) (p=0.03) for rhDNase alone & 0.03 litres (1.88%) (p=0.67) for rhDNase and mannitol. None of the secondary clinical outcomes were statistically significantly different between treatments.

Conclusions: Inhaled mannitol was at least as effective as rhDNase after 3 months treatment. There was a marked individual variation in tolerance to mannitol and in response to therapy however. Children who do not respond to rhDNase many benefit from a trial of inhaled mannitol. The combination of mannitol and rhDNase was not useful.

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT00117208).

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles

    • Airwaves
      Wisia Wedzicha