rss
Thorax doi:10.1136/thx.2007.084251

Can lay people deliver asthma self management education as effectively as primary care-based practice nurses?

  1. Martyn R Partridge (m.partridge{at}imperial.ac.uk)
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
    1. Ann-Louise Caress (ann.caress{at}man.ac.uk)
    1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
      1. Clare Brown (clare.brown{at}tiscali.co.uk)
      1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
        1. Jean Hennings (jean.hennings{at}manchester.ac.uk)
        1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
          1. Karen Luker (karen.luker{at}manchester.ac.uk)
          1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
            1. Ashley Woodcock (ashley.woodcock{at}manchester.ac.uk)
            1. North West Lung Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
              1. Malcolm Campbell (malcolm.campbell{at}manchester.ac.uk)
              1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
                • Published Online First 15 February 2008

                Abstract

                Can lay people deliver asthma self-management education as effectively as primary care-based practice nurses?

                Objectives: To determine whether well-trained lay people could deliver asthma self-management education with comparable outcomes to that achieved by primary care-based practice nurses.

                Design: Randomised equivalence trial.

                Setting: Thirty nine general practices in West London and North West England.

                Participants: 567 patients with asthma who were on regular maintenance therapy. Fifteen lay educators were recruited and trained to deliver asthma self-management education.

                Intervention: An initial consultation of up to 45 minutes offered either by a lay educator or a practice-based primary care nurse, followed by a second shorter face-to-face consultation and telephone follow up for one year.

                Main outcome measures: Unscheduled need for healthcare

                Secondary outcome measures: Patient satisfaction and need for courses of oral steroids.

                Results: 567 patients were randomised to care by a nurse (N=287) or a lay educator (N=280) and 146 and 171, respectively, attended the first face-to-face educational session. . During the first two consultations management changes were made in 35/146 patients seen by a practice nurse (24.0%) and in 56/171 patients (32.7%) seen by a lay educator. For 418/567 patients (73.7%), we have one year data on use of unscheduled healthcare. Under an intention to treat approach, 61/205 patients (29.8%) in the nurse-led group required unscheduled care, compared with 65/213 (30.5%) in the lay-led group (90% CI for difference -8.1% to 6.6%; 95% CI for difference -9.5% to 8.0%). The 90% CI contained the pre-determined equivalence region (-5% to +5%) giving an inconclusive result regarding the equivalence of the two approaches. Despite the fact that all patients had been prescribed regular maintenance therapy, 122/418 patients (29.2%) required courses of steroid tablets during the course of one year. Patient satisfaction following the initial face-to-face consultation was similar in both groups.

                Conclusions: It is possible to recruit and train lay educators to deliver a discrete area of respiratory care, with comparable outcomes to those seen by nurses.

                This Article

                1. All Versions of this Article:
                  1. thx.2007.084251v1
                  2. 63/9/778 most recent

                Services

                1. Request permissions

                Social bookmarking

                Register for free content


                Free sample
                This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
                View free sample issue >>

                Free archive
                The full back archive is now available for Thorax. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
                Register to access the free archive >>

                Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.