Article Text

other Versions

PDF

Can lay people deliver asthma self management education as effectively as primary care-based practice nurses?
  1. Martyn R Partridge (m.partridge{at}imperial.ac.uk)
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
    1. Ann-Louise Caress (ann.caress{at}man.ac.uk)
    1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
      1. Clare Brown (clare.brown{at}tiscali.co.uk)
      1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
        1. Jean Hennings (jean.hennings{at}manchester.ac.uk)
        1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
          1. Karen Luker (karen.luker{at}manchester.ac.uk)
          1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
            1. Ashley Woodcock (ashley.woodcock{at}manchester.ac.uk)
            1. North West Lung Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
              1. Malcolm Campbell (malcolm.campbell{at}manchester.ac.uk)
              1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom

                Abstract

                Can lay people deliver asthma self-management education as effectively as primary care-based practice nurses?

                Objectives: To determine whether well-trained lay people could deliver asthma self-management education with comparable outcomes to that achieved by primary care-based practice nurses.

                Design: Randomised equivalence trial.

                Setting: Thirty nine general practices in West London and North West England.

                Participants: 567 patients with asthma who were on regular maintenance therapy. Fifteen lay educators were recruited and trained to deliver asthma self-management education.

                Intervention: An initial consultation of up to 45 minutes offered either by a lay educator or a practice-based primary care nurse, followed by a second shorter face-to-face consultation and telephone follow up for one year.

                Main outcome measures: Unscheduled need for healthcare

                Secondary outcome measures: Patient satisfaction and need for courses of oral steroids.

                Results: 567 patients were randomised to care by a nurse (N=287) or a lay educator (N=280) and 146 and 171, respectively, attended the first face-to-face educational session. . During the first two consultations management changes were made in 35/146 patients seen by a practice nurse (24.0%) and in 56/171 patients (32.7%) seen by a lay educator. For 418/567 patients (73.7%), we have one year data on use of unscheduled healthcare. Under an intention to treat approach, 61/205 patients (29.8%) in the nurse-led group required unscheduled care, compared with 65/213 (30.5%) in the lay-led group (90% CI for difference -8.1% to 6.6%; 95% CI for difference -9.5% to 8.0%). The 90% CI contained the pre-determined equivalence region (-5% to +5%) giving an inconclusive result regarding the equivalence of the two approaches. Despite the fact that all patients had been prescribed regular maintenance therapy, 122/418 patients (29.2%) required courses of steroid tablets during the course of one year. Patient satisfaction following the initial face-to-face consultation was similar in both groups.

                Conclusions: It is possible to recruit and train lay educators to deliver a discrete area of respiratory care, with comparable outcomes to those seen by nurses.

                • Asthma
                • Lay Educators
                • Primary Care
                • Self Management
                • Unscheduled health care

                Statistics from Altmetric.com

                Request permissions

                If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

                Linked Articles

                • Airwaves
                  Wisia Wedzicha