Article Text

other Versions

  • You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (March 13, 2007).

PDF

Pathological features and inhaled corticosteroid response of eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma
  1. Mike A Berry (mike.berry{at}mac.com)
  1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
    1. Angela Morgan (angela.morgan{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
    1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
      1. Dominick E Shaw (dominic.shaw{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
      1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
        1. Deborah Parker (dp66{at}le.ac.uk)
        1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
          1. Ruth H Green (ruth.green{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
          1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
            1. Chris E Brightling (chris.brightling{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
            1. University of Leicester, United Kingdom
              1. Peter Bradding (peter.bradding{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
              1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
                1. Andrew J Wardlaw (aw24{at}le.ac.uk)
                1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom
                  1. Ian D Pavord (ian.pavord{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
                  1. University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom

                    Abstract

                    Introduction Non-eosinophilic asthma is a potentially important clinicopathological phenotype since there is evidence that it responds poorly to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. However, little is known about the underlying airway immunopathology and there are no data from placebo controlled studies examining the effect of inhaled corticosteroids.

                    Methods We have investigated airway immunopathology using induced sputum, bronchial biopsies, bronchial wash and bronchioalveolar lavage in 12 patients with symptomatic eosinophilic and 11 patients with non-eosinophilic asthma and 10 healthy controls. The patients with non-eosinophilic asthma and 6 different patients with eosinophilic asthma entered a randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled cross over study in which we investigated the effects of inhaled mometasone 400μg once daily for 8 weeks on airway responsiveness and asthma quality of life.

                    Results Patients with non-eosinophilic asthma had absence of eosinophils in the mucosa (median 4.4 cells/mm2 vs. 23 cells/mm2 in eosinophilic asthma and vs. 0 cells/mm2 in normal controls; p=0.03) and normal subepithelial layer thickness (5.8μm vs. 10.3μm in eosinophilic asthma and vs. 5.1μm in controls, p=0.002). Non eosinophilic and eosinophilic asthma groups had increased mast cell numbers in the airway smooth muscle compared to normal controls (9 vs. 8 vs. 0 cells/mm2, p=0.016). Compared to placebo 8 weeks treatment with inhaled mometasone led to less improvement in methacholine PC20 (0.5 vs. 5.5 doubling concentrations, 95% C.I. of difference 1.1, 9.1; p=0.018) and asthma quality of life (0.2 vs. 1.0 points, 95% C.I. of the difference 0.27, 1.43; p=0.008).

                    Conclusions Non-eosinophilic asthma represents a pathologically distinct disease phenotype, which is characterised by absence of airway eosinophilia, normal subepithelial layer thickness and a poor short-term response to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

                    • Asthma
                    • eosinophil
                    • immunopathology
                    • inhaled steroid

                    Statistics from Altmetric.com

                    Request permissions

                    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

                    Linked Articles