Article Text

P148 Making sense of patient-reported currently treated asthma using routinely collected data
  1. MA Al Sallakh1,
  2. SE Rodgers1,
  3. RA Lyons1,
  4. A Sheikh2,
  5. GA Davies1
  1. 1Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
  2. 2Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK


Introduction and objectives Currently treated asthma (CTA) is commonly assessed in epidemiological studies and is typically self-reported. We investigated how patient understanding of this label compared with objective measures extracted from routinely collected data.

Methods We used the Welsh Health Survey 2014 results for individuals aged 16+. Self-reported CTA was measured with the question: “Are you currently being treated for asthma?” We included those who had valid responses, are record-linked to the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank, and had complete GP practice registrations between 2009 and 2014. From the GP dataset, we queried their most recent prescriptions, if any, and whether they had ever recorded asthma diagnosis, and cross-tabulated these variables with self-reported CTA. We examined the concordance between self-reported CTA and each of ‘ever prescriptions’, ‘ever diagnosis’, and ‘having prescriptions in varying backward intervals from mid-2014’, with the latter repeated by adding ‘ever diagnosis’.

Results Of 4,291 eligible people, 10.2% self-reported CTA but, of these, 11.2% had no prescriptions in the past 12 months and 22.4% had no recorded asthma diagnosis ever. Figure 1A shows full intersections between the variables. For concordance between self-reported CTA and each of ‘ever prescriptions’ and ‘ever diagnosis’, Cohen’s kappa was 0.42 and 0.68, respectively. For concordance between self-reported CTA and ‘prescriptions in backward intervals’, kappa was 0.76 for the 12-month interval but peaked to 0.77 at 9-months. After adding ‘ever diagnosis’, the kappa became 0.78 for the 12-month measure (which represents the treated asthma criteria of the Quality of Outcomes Framework, QOF), and peaked to 0.79 at 18-months (Figure 1B).

Conclusion In Wales, self-reported currently treated asthma showed good concordance with the QOF treated asthma criteria but a slightly better concordance with ‘any prescriptions in the last 18 months and ever diagnosis’ measured from routine GP data. However, the concordance remains suboptimal, demonstrating that self-reported CTA should be used with caution, and objective measures from routinely collected health data are preferred.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.