Article Text

PDF

Original article
Using venous blood gas analysis in the assessment of COPD exacerbations: a prospective cohort study
  1. Tricia M McKeever1,
  2. Glenn Hearson2,
  3. Gemma Housley3,
  4. Catherine Reynolds2,
  5. William Kinnear4,
  6. Tim W Harrison2,
  7. Anne-Maree Kelly5,
  8. Dominick E Shaw2,3
  1. 1Division of Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2Respiratory Research Unit, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  3. 3Medical Informatics, East Midlands Academic Health Sciences Network, Nottingham, UK
  4. 4Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospital Trust, Nottingham, UK
  5. 5Emergency Medicine, Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dominick E Shaw, Respiratory Research Unit, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Edwards Lane, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; dominic.shaw{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

Introduction Identifying acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is crucial in the initial management of acute exacerbations of COPD. Guidelines recommend obtaining arterial blood samples but these are more difficult to obtain than venous. We assessed whether blood gas values derived from venous blood could replace arterial at initial assessment.

Methods Patients requiring hospital treatment for an exacerbation of COPD had paired arterial and venous samples taken. Bland–Altman analyses were performed to assess agreement between arterial and venous pH, CO2 and Graphic. The relationship between SpO2 and SaO2 was assessed. The number of attempts and pain scores for each sample were measured.

Results 234 patients were studied. There was good agreement between arterial and venous measures of pH and Graphic (mean difference 0.03 and −0.04, limits of agreement −0.05 to 0.11 and −2.90 to 2.82, respectively), and between SaO2 and SpO2 (in patients with an SpO2 of >80%). Arterial sampling required more attempts and was more painful than venous (mean pain score 4 (IQR 2–5) and 1 (IQR 0–2), respectively, p<0.001).

Conclusions Arterial sampling is more difficult and more painful than venous sampling. There is good agreement between pH and Graphic values derived from venous and arterial blood, and between pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas oxygen saturations. These agreements could allow the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations to be based on venous blood gas analysis and pulse oximetry, simplifying the care pathway and improving the patient experience.

  • COPD Exacerbations

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Key messages

What is the key question?

  • Can venous blood gas analysis replace arterial blood gas sampling in the initial assessment of patients with COPD exacerbations?

What is the bottom line?

  • Over two-thirds of arterial blood gas samples could be replaced by the simpler and safer use of venous blood gas analysis.

Why read on?

  • This paper describes agreement between arteriovenous measures for key blood gas parameters and presents a simple algorithm for the substitution of arterial blood gas sampling with venous in the initial management of patients admitted to hospital with a COPD exacerbation.

Introduction

Exacerbations of COPD are the second most common cause of emergency hospital admission in the UK, with an estimated 94 000 per year.1 COPD exacerbations have a very high risk of mortality; 50% of people with a severe exacerbation will die within 4 years of an admission.1

The recognition that high flow oxygen therapy can induce hypercapnia in susceptible patients during exacerbations of COPD,2 and that respiratory acidosis is associated with a worse outcome3 ,4 led to a rise in arterial blood gas (ABG) sampling to measure pH, PaCO2, PaO2 and Embedded Image. The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) COPD guidelines recommend obtaining an ABG in all patients admitted to hospital with a COPD exacerbation.5 Arterial sampling is more technically difficult and reportedly more painful6 than venous blood gas (VBG) sampling. Administration of local anaesthetic prior to arterial sampling is recommended but seldom used, as shown in a recent survey of junior doctors where 91% never or rarely used local anaesthesia when performing arterial puncture.7 Using less invasive measures of pCO2 and SaO2 could greatly benefit patients by both decreasing pain and streamlining the care pathway.

Recent meta-analysis data suggest good agreement between venous and arterial measurements of pH, Embedded Image and base excess.8–11 In diabetes care arterial sampling has been replaced with venous for the monitoring of diabetic ketoacidosis.12 The use of venous samples to guide treatment in COPD exacerbations has been limited, perhaps because the relationship between arterial and venous measures of CO2 is less strong, although a PvCO2 of >6 kPa has been shown to have 100% (95% CI 97% to 100%) sensitivity in identifying patients with clinically relevant hypercapnia.13

We set out to assess the relationship between arterial and venous measures of PCO2, pH and Embedded Image, and between arterial and pulse oximetry oxygen saturations during exacerbations of COPD, in order to establish whether VBG analysis combined with pulse oximetry could replace ABG analysis in the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations.

Methods

Patients admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals Trust with a doctor-diagnosed exacerbation of COPD were considered for inclusion. Patients were included in the study unless they refused. If they were unable to give informed consent an approved alternative decision maker was approached. Recruited patients had an ABG and pulse oximetry performed by a junior doctor as per routine care, and a parallel paired VBG sample. Care was guided by the ABG results as per current clinical guidelines.

Arterial samples were collected via a heparinised needle and syringe system, and venous samples were aspirated into a separate heparinised blood gas syringe via a butterfly needle or needle. Samples were processed as soon as possible on the same ward-based blood gas analyser. Analysers were calibrated regularly in accordance with the department of medical physics standard operating procedure. Research nurses collected data on demographics, body mass index, smoking status, pain scores (visual analogue scores 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) for arterial and venous sampling and the number of attempts taken to acquire each sample.

The main outcomes were the agreements between ABG and VBG parameters, and between ABG and pulse oximetry measures of oxygen saturation. Secondary outcome measures included pain scores, and the number of attempts taken to obtain blood.

Statistical analysis

Agreements between venous and arterial samples for CO2, pH and Embedded Image, and between SaO2 and SpO2 were assessed using the Bland–Altman method. Previous studies found 40% of patients attending the Emergency Department with an exacerbation of COPD had arterial hypercarbia, and it was estimated that 200 patients would allow us to calculate the sensitivity of the venous CO2 screening threshold for detection of arterial hypercarbia with CIs of <5%.9 ,13 Using this sample size of 200, our 95% CI around the limits of agreement are estimated at 0.24× the SD of the mean difference for which pH is ±0.001.14

Missing data were not imputed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to estimate how venous CO2, pH, Embedded Image predicted arterial values and how SpO2 predicted SaO2. Area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity were calculated to predict an arterial pH ≥7.35 and bicarbonate ≥21, and for the pulse oximetry result to predict an SaO2 of ≥92%.

Results

Over the time course of the study (from 3 February 2013 to 10 January 2014), there were 1376 admissions with a coded diagnosis of COPD exacerbation. Of these, 234 participants were recruited and had at least one paired sample of blood gases. Twelve patients declined study participation. The mean age of the population was 71 years (SD 10.8) and 50% of the population was male. Characteristics of the population are shown in table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of study population

There was good agreement between arterial and venous pH, and between arterial and venous Embedded Image (figures 1 and 2 and tables 2 and 3), however, the CO2 values varied significantly (figure 3). There was also a good agreement between SaO2 and SpO2 in those patients with an SpO2 of ≥80% (figure 4 and tables 2 and 3). These relationships were not significantly different in the 20 patients with an admission systolic blood pressure of <100 mm Hg (see online supplementary material).

Table 2

Agreement between arterial and venous pCO2, pH and HCO3

Table 3

Agreement between SaO2 and SpO2

Figure 1

Bland–Altman plot for arterial and venous blood pH levels.

Figure 2

Bland–Altman plot for arterial and venous blood bicarbonate levels.

Figure 3

Bland–Altman plot for arterial and venous blood CO2 levels.

Figure 4

Bland–Altman plot for SaO2 and SpO2 levels. (This graph only includes patients with a pulse oximetry value of >80%.)

Venous blood cut points for managing acute exacerbations of COPD

Given the relationships observed, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of a VBG pH and Embedded Image to correctly identify an arterial pH of ≥7.35, and an arterial Embedded Image of ≥21, as well as an SpO2 to identify an SaO2 of ≥92% (table 4). A venous pH of 7.34, a venous Embedded Image of 21.45 and an SpO2 of 91.5 would have correctly classified 87% (95% CI 82% to 91%), 97% (95% CI 93% to 98%) and 71% (95% CI 65% to 77%) of patients, respectively. In terms of specificity, 96% of patients with an ABG pH of ≥7.35 also had a VBG pH of ≥7.35 (tables 5 and 6).

Table 4

Pain score and number of venesection attempts

Table 5

Predictive performance of venous blood gas parameters

Table 6

Predictive performance of pulse oximetry

We used current oxygen guidelines15 to calculate how many ABG samples may have been avoided if the venous cut points were used instead. Of our 234 patients, 72 (31%) had a venous pH <7.35. Of the 162 with a venous pH ≥7.35, only two had an arterial pH of <7.35.

Consequently, we estimate approximately two-thirds of ABGs can safely be avoided in the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations. This figure does not factor in the repeat attempts needed to obtain arterial blood. Using these data, we suggest a new algorithm for the management of COPD exacerbations based on the current guidelines (figure 5).

Figure 5

Suggested algorithm for blood gas analysis during COPD exacerbation (adapted from Kelly10). ABG, arterial blood gas; ICU, intensive care unit; NIV, non-invasive ventilation.

Timing of samples

We assessed the mean difference in time between the paired arterial and venous samples to see if a delay between samples had an effect on the relationship between ABG and VBG parameters. The mean time difference was −4.18 min, SD 16.92, range −58.98 to 78.64 min (arterial–venous). Given the range, we repeated our analysis using the 168 paired samples that were performed within 15 min of each other. This did not affect the relationships (see online supplementary table).

Pain score

The median pain score was significantly higher for ABG sampling as compared with VBG (p<0.001). In addition, there was a significantly greater number of attempts taken to obtain an ABG sample (69.2% achieved at first attempt) compared with VBG, where 90.2% were obtained at the first attempt (p<0.001) (table 4).

Discussion

Exacerbations of COPD are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide,16 and our local figures reflect this. In 2010, there were 1343 admissions into Nottingham University Hospitals Trust. The management of COPD exacerbations depends upon quickly identifying acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. In this study, we set out to establish if ABG analysis obtained for the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations could be replaced by VBG analysis and pulse oximetry when assessing for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

We examined the agreement between ABG and VBG parameters and between ABG and pulse oximetry measurements of oxygen saturation in COPD exacerbations and found acceptable agreement for pH, Embedded Image and for SaO2 at an SpO2 >80%. We found that 96% of patients with an ABG pH of <7.35 also had a VBG pH of <7.35 and that only two patients were misclassified as having a normal venous pH but a low arterial pH.

A meta-analysis of five studies examining the utility of peripheral VBG analyses in exacerbations of COPD in the emergency department found that there was agreement between arterial and venous pH and Embedded Image.9 The weighted average difference for pCO2 was 0.79 kPa (n=440), whereas those for pH and Embedded Image were 0.028 and 1.34 mmol (n=239), respectively. The relatively weaker relationship seen between SpO2 and SaO2 at lower levels is unsurprising as commercial pulse oximeters are more accurate at higher oxygen saturations and significantly less accurate below 80%.17 ,18 The proposed algorithm reflects this; any patient with an SpO2 of <80% needs an immediate ABG.

Our study has limitations. There was a small time gap between sample acquisition and processing, although results did not change significantly when this was factored in. We also had a pragmatic approach to sample collection which depended upon our junior doctors and specialist nurses; consequently, it was difficult to fully exclude mixed arterial/venous stabs which may explain why the sensitivities and specificities to predict an arterial pH of <7.35 were not 100%. We stress in our algorithm that if there is a risk or actual clinical deterioration an arterial analysis should be performed.

Arterial sampling was more painful than venous and required more attempts. While the pain of arterial sampling can be reduced by using local anaesthetic, it is not widely used.7 Although capillary sampling is used in speciality wards, widespread adoption is difficult because of the extra training, resources and time needed. As patients with exacerbations of COPD almost always have venipuncture to obtain samples for full blood count and blood chemistry analysis, VBG analysis can be performed on the same sample.

Our results suggest that the close relationship between venous and arterial acid base parameters, and between oxygen saturations obtained from pulse oximetry and arterial blood, could allow the initial assessment of acute COPD exacerbations to be based on a combined measurement of a VBG pH and SpO2. This would mean a change in practice as the current oxygen guidelines published by the British Thoracic Society15 state that any patient requiring supplemental oxygen to achieve a target SpO2 of 92%–94% should have an arterial blood or arteriolised capillary blood gas performed.

We suggest that arterial sampling is reserved for patients with a venous pH of <7.35. The approach of using venous blood first has obvious benefits. Only one blood draw would be required resulting in less pain and a lower risk of bruising and associated side effects. Less training would be required to initially assess acid/base status, and fewer attempts to draw blood would be needed, needing less equipment and simplifying the care pathway for COPD exacerbations. We conservatively estimate that >66% of ABG attempts would be avoided and replaced by VBG sampling.

Conclusion

There is a good agreement between pH and Embedded Image values derived from venous and arterial blood, and between pulse oximetry and ABG oxygen saturations. These agreements could allow the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations to be based on VBG analysis and pulse oximetry rather than ABG analysis, simplifying the care pathway.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the expertise and help of Rachel King and Adeline Sheehan for recruiting the patients running the study. They would like to thank all the ward staff and junior doctors working in the Emergency Department, Emergency Admissions Unit, Medical High Dependency Unit and Respiratory Wards at Queens Medical Centre and Nottingham City Hospital for their help with the study, and the hospital at night nurse coordinator team. The authors also wish to acknowledge Dr Dale Gardiner for his expert blood gas input.

References

View Abstract
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. Data in the abstract and in Table 2 has been corrected. Figure 3 has been updated due to data corrections.

  • Twitter Follow Glenn Hearson at @NottinghamRRU

  • Contributors TMM performed the bulk of the data analyses and commented on the manuscript. GH helped with data acquisition and cleaning and commented on the manuscript. GH helped with data acquisition and follow-up data analyses and commented on the manuscript. CR and WK helped with data acquisition and commented on the manuscript. TWH helped with study design, data interpretation and commented on the manuscript. A-MK helped with study design, data interpretation and commented on the manuscript. DES had the original idea for the study, designed the study and obtained funding. He wrote the first draft.

  • Funding This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research's (NIHR) research for patient benefit programme, grant number PB-PG-0211-24049. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Nottingham Research and Ethics Committee East Midlands Nottingham 1 12/EM/0323.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Data on mortality are available; these were not included at the request of reviewer 3 but will be presented in abstract form.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles