Article Text

PDF
P186 Chest Drain Care Bundle improves Chest Drain Insertion in District General Hospital
  1. H Steer,
  2. J Hutton,
  3. S Graham,
  4. R Jones
  1. Gloucestershire NHS Trust, Gloucester, UK

Abstract

Introduction and objectives Chest drain insertion is a common advanced procedure with a significant associated risk of pain, distress and serious complications. Nationally, audit and patient safety work has highlighted a number of safety concerns around chest drain insertion.

Previous audit work has demonstrated poor levels of documentation; particularly around use of pre-medication, use of ultrasound guidance and consent. This has obvious potential consequences for patient safety and thus is an important target for improvement work.

Method National best practice standards were identified through review of national guidance. This work quantifies current standards of documentation in Gloucestershire against national best practice standards. Drain insertion was prospectively analysed over a 3 month period to establish baseline standards of documentation. A combination of accessible and easy-to-read guidelines, education and the introduction of a chest drain bundle were introduced. Chest drain insertion was then re-audited over a further 3 month period and assessed for improvement.

Results The data set included 24 pre-intervention and 23 post-intervention. Results demonstrated an improvement in many areas of documentation. Prior to the intervention, documentation was found to be poor; especially in areas related to consent, use of ultrasonography, pre-medication, post-procedure advice, details regarding length and size of drain and investigations requested. Overall the results showed improvement in most areas of documentation.

The care bundle demonstrated improvement in documentation compared to the classical “freehand” documentation. However, only 40% of cases used the new proforma due to a mixture of staff rotation and an unexpectedly high proportion of drains inserted in non-targeted areas including the emergency department, theatre and intensive care.

Outcomes were also compared against the recent national findings from the 2015 British Thoracic Society Pleural Procedures audit. Use of the chest drain bundle created improved compliance with several key standards; particularly written consent, bedside ultrasonography, nursing chest drain observation and care on designated respiratory ward.

Conclusion The chest drain care bundle improves documentation of this important procedure. This is important to ensure uniformity in clinical “best” practice, aid communication and protect patients. Further improvements can be made by more widespread education and access to the care bundle.

Abstract P186 Figure 1

Comparison of written consent obtained pre-intervention, post-intervention, when proforma exclusively used and national average. Target = 98%

Abstract P186 Figure 2

Comparison of use of bedside ultrasongraphy pre-intervention, post-intervention, when proforma exclusively used and national average. Target = 100%

Abstract P186 Figure 3

Comparison of use of nursing drain observation sheets pre-intervention, post-intervention, when proforma exclusively used and national average. Target = 100%

Abstract P186 Figure 4

Comparison of care on respiratory ward pre-intervention, post-intervention and national average. Target = 100%

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.