Article Text


P52 Prisms: A Systematic Review Of The Mrc ‘phase Iv’ Evidence On Implementing Asthma Self-management
  1. H Pinnock1,
  2. E Epiphaniou2,
  3. HL Parke3,
  4. G Pearce4,
  5. SJC Taylor2
  1. 1Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MEsh), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  3. 3Kings College London, London, UK
  4. 4University of Coventry, Coventry, UK


Aim Asthma self-management is effective in clinical trials, widely recommended by guidelines but poorly implemented. We aimed to synthesise the evidence from implementation studies of asthma self-management support interventions to inform delivery in routine clinical practice.

Methods Using systematic review methodology (Cochrane Handbook) we searched eight electronic databases, performed snowball and manual searches, and searched research databases for unpublished and on-going work. We included studies with a range of methodologies, and which evaluated the introduction of an asthma self-management support intervention in routine clinical practice. We assessed included papers for quality (Downs and Black), extracted and synthesised data on process (e.g. number of action plans issued) and clinical outcomes (e.g. measures of asthma control, unscheduled healthcare). Narrative synthesis used the whole systems approach as a framework. [PROSPERO registration: CRD42012002898].

Results We included 18 studies (7 randomised trials, 8 longitudinal database studies, 3 uncontrolled studies) from primary, secondary, community and managed care settings in six countries. Interventions which explicitly addressed patient, professional and organisational factors (n = 7 studies) showed the most consistent improvement in both process and clinical outcomes. Targeting professionals (n = 2 studies) improved process but not clinical outcomes. Targeting patients (n = 6 studies) had inconsistent impact on process/clinical outcomes. Targeting the organisation (n = 3 studies) improved process, and had a small effect on clinical outcomes. Authors highlighted the importance of a healthcare system committed to supporting self-management, skills training for professionals, patient education programmes supported by regular reviews, and on-going evaluation of the implementation process.

Conclusion Effective interventions were complex: actively engaging patients, and training and motivating professionals within the context of an organisation which prioritised supported self-management. Commissioners and providers of services for people with asthma should consider how they can promote a culture of supporting self-management as a normal, expected, monitored and remunerated aspect of the provision of care.

Funding NIHR HS&DR programme (project number 11/1014/04). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Hs and DR programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.