Article Text

PDF
P161 Assessment Of Age-adjusted D-dimer Cut-off Values In Investigating Venous Thromboembolism In Older Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
  1. SSM Lau,
  2. GEJ Murphy
  1. Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Introduction and objectives The specificity of D-dimer testing in detecting venous thromboembolism (VTE) appears to fall in older patients as D-dimer concentrations increase with age. There has been interest in the use of age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off values to increase the specificity in older patients. The objective of this study was to review the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing in older patients with suspected VTE in our population, comparing conventional and age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off values.

Methods A retrospective study from a large teaching hospital in the UK was undertaken. 389 data episodes were compiled from suspected VTE presentations during two months in 2013. Patients were assessed using a combination of clinical probability scores and D-dimer measurement (D-dimer HS assay, Instrumentation Laboratories). Conventional (230 ng/ml) and age-adjusted (age x 10 ng/ml) cut-off values were applied to patients ≥50 years, and specificity and sensitivity were calculated.

Results (Table 1) Of the 389 presentations, 229 (58.9%) were from patients aged ≥50 years. 13 (11.5%) patients with positive D-dimers using the conventional cut-off, had VTE as confirmed by imaging tests. The sensitivity of the conventional D-dimer cut-off value was 100% in this older cohort, with a specificity of 53.7%. The age x10-adjusted cut-off improved specificity to 84.7%; however sensitivity was markedly reduced to 76.9%, with 3 patients (23.1%) with non-high clinical probability of VTE missed. Further analysis suggested that an age-adjusted cut-off factor of x3 would maintain sensitivity at 100%; however specificity was only 47.7%.

Conclusions We have identified that an age-adjusted cut-off factor of x10 significantly increased D-dimer specificity in older patients; however the sensitivity of this test was unacceptably compromised. A cut-off factor of x3 maintained sensitivity, but specificity was unsatisfactory compared to conventional values, although still higher than in most published series. We conclude that we cannot use an age-adjusted cut-off of x10 in our ≥50 year old population using this assay. Further work is required to identify an appropriate cut-off, concentrating on the >75 year old patients only. This would help to reduce the number of unnecessary tests and anxiety in this vulnerable group of patients.

Abstract P161 Table 1

Characteristics of conventional and age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in patients ≥50 years old

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.