Article Text

Original article
NMR spectroscopy metabolomic profiling of exhaled breath condensate in patients with stable and unstable cystic fibrosis
Free
  1. Paolo Montuschi1,
  2. Debora Paris2,
  3. Dominique Melck2,
  4. Vincenzina Lucidi3,
  5. Giovanni Ciabattoni4,
  6. Valeria Raia5,
  7. Cecilia Calabrese6,
  8. Andrew Bush7,
  9. Peter J Barnes8,
  10. Andrea Motta2
  1. 1Department of Pharmacology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
  2. 2Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council, Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy
  3. 3Department of Paediatrics, Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
  4. 4Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
  5. 5Department of Pediatrics, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
  6. 6Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
  7. 7Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine at the National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
  8. 8Airway Disease Section, Imperial College School of Medicine at the National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Paolo Montuschi, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy; pmontuschi{at}rm.unicatt.it

Abstract

Background Metabolomics could provide new insights into the pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis (CF) by identifying profiles of endogenous metabolites.

Objectives To investigate whether metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate could discriminate between patients with unstable CF, stable CF and healthy subjects, and whether selected metabolites were responsible for between-group differences.

Methods Twenty-nine patients with stable CF, 24 with unstable CF and 31 healthy subjects (age 9–24 years) participated in a cross-sectional study. Metabolomics was performed with high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis was used as classifier. The results were validated in a second independent study.

Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for between-day and technical repeatability were 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis showed good within-day repeatability. Correct classification rate of CF (n=53) vs healthy subjects (n=31) was 96% (R2=0.84; Q2=0.79). Model validation with a testing sample set obtained from subjects not included in the primary analysis (23 CF and 25 healthy subjects) showed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 96%. The classification rate of stable CF (n=29) vs unstable CF patients (n=24) was 95% (R2=0.82; Q2=0.78). Model external validation in 14 patients with stable CF and 16 with unstable CF showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 94%. Ethanol, acetate, 2-propanol and acetone were most discriminant between patients with CF and healthy subjects, whereas acetate, ethanol, 2-propanol and methanol were the most important metabolites for discriminating between patients with stable and unstable CF.

Conclusions Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of exhaled breath condensate is reproducible, discriminates patients with CF from healthy subjects and patients with unstable CF from those with stable CF, and identifies the metabolites responsible for between-group differences.

  • Metabolomics
  • nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
  • exhaled breath condensate
  • cystic fibrosis
  • COPD mechanisms
  • allergic lung disease
  • asthma
  • asthma mechanisms
  • asthma pharmacology
  • COPD pharmacology
  • exhaled airway markers
  • bronchiectasis
  • cytokine biology
  • asthma guidelines
  • lung physiology
  • paediatric asthma
  • paediatric lung disease
  • drug reactions

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

Footnotes

  • PM, DP, DM contributed equally to this work.

  • Funding Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Academic Funds 2009–2011, Italian National Research Council (CNR), Italian Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome and University of Naples Federico II, Italy.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.