Impaired type I and III interferon response to rhinovirus infection during pregnancy and asthma
- 1Centre for Asthma and Respiratory Disease, The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- 2Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
- Correspondence to Rebecca Louise Forbes, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Region Mail, New Lambton, NSW, Australia, 2350;
Contributors PGG, PABW and VEM were responsible for the planning and intellectual input/advice for the article. RLF was responsible for the planning, conduct and reporting of the work described in the article.
- Received 30 January 2011
- Accepted 11 August 2011
- Published Online First 13 September 2011
Background Acute respiratory tract infections are common ailments to all individuals and the human rhinoviruses (HRVs) cause most of these infections. Pregnant women have increased susceptibility and disease severity to viral infections like influenza and HRVs, as do asthmatics. Successful pregnancy requires immunological modulation to permit fetal tolerance.
Objectives To determine whether pregnant women have reduced innate antiviral interferon (IFN) responses to HRV infection compared with non-pregnant women.
Methods An in vitro culture system was used, where peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood of 54 women, including 10 stable asthmatics who were pregnant and 10 who were not pregnant, 10 non-asthmatic women who were pregnant, 10 who were ≥6 months post partum and 10 who were not pregnant. Samples were also collected from four exacerbating pregnant asthmatics. PBMCs were cultured with HRV43 and HRV1B. The antiviral proteins IFNα and IFNλ were measured from culture supernatants by ELISA.
Results Compared with healthy non-pregnant women, pregnant women had significantly reduced innate IFN responses to HRV infection (p<0.02), persisting ≥6 months post partum (p≤0.02). Pregnant asthmatics had significantly reduced IFNλ responses compared with healthy non-pregnant women (p≤0.034), while during current asthma exacerbations a decrease in IFNα (p≤0.023) and IFNλ (p=0.007) was observed. Induction by a TLR7 agonist induced a similar pattern of decreased innate IFNs during pregnancy as observed when HRV was the inducing agent.
Conclusions Reduced antiviral IFNs during pregnancy and asthma provide an important mechanism for increased susceptibility, morbidity and mortality in pregnant women with respiratory viral infection.
What is the key question?
What are the innate antiviral immune alterations in pregnancy and asthma that contribute to their increased susceptibility and disease severity to respiratory virus infection?
What is the bottom line?
In pregnancy and asthma, there is a significant reduction in host antiviral type I and III interferons in response to human rhinovirus infections.
Why read on?
The results of this research are novel and provide us with an important insight as to why pregnant women are more susceptible and have increased disease severity to respiratory virus infections.
Respiratory virus infections are a major issue during pregnancy, since pregnant women have increased susceptibility to respiratory virus infections as well as subsequent increased disease severity and duration of infection.1 2 Pregnancy can be viewed as an ‘immunological balancing act’ where fetal tolerance (via maternal immunosuppression) is essential and yet a degree of maternal protection must be maintained against invading pathogens. Alterations in adaptive immunity have been identified during pregnancy; the most notable being a switch from T-helper-1 immunity towards a T-helper-2 type response.3 The innate immune system is essential in the host's defence during viral infections with the type I (α/β) and type III (λ) interferons (IFNs) known to be a critical component of this innate defence. IFNs are released by virus-infected epithelial cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)4 and act to facilitate both early innate immunity as well as priming the later antiviral adaptive immune response.5 6 Alterations in the innate immune response during pregnancy may have important implications; however, little research has investigated modifications that are likely to arise, and much less the potential effects this may have on immunity during viral infections.
Asthma is a common comorbidity during pregnancy with 18–36% of pregnant asthmatics reported to experience at least one severe asthma exacerbation requiring hospitalisation, emergency department presentation, unscheduled doctor's visit or a course of oral corticosteroids (OCS).7 Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) are responsible for 60–80% of all respiratory virus-induced asthma exacerbations.8 9 Pregnant asthmatics have increased susceptibility to viral infections compared with pregnant non-asthmatics,10 as well as increased symptom severity and duration of infections compared with non-asthmatics.11 12
Blood and bronchial epithelial cells from non-pregnant asthmatics exhibit reduced antiviral type I and III IFN responses to respiratory viruses, associated with increased viral replication, airway inflammation and increased asthma symptoms.13–15 While asthmatics exhibit reduced IFN production to respiratory virus infections, it is not known whether pregnant women have a similar reduction or whether asthma in pregnancy further exaggerates this effect, thereby explaining the increased susceptibility observed in pregnant women during respiratory virus infections. We hypothesised that pregnant women would exhibit reduced type I and III IFN responses to in vitro HRV infection, which may be further worsened in asthmatics.
Materials and methods
This cross-sectional study of 54 participants included six groups: 10 pregnant women with asthma and 10 without, 10 non-pregnant women with asthma and 10 without, as well as 10 non-asthmatic women in the postpartum period (≥6 months after childbirth) and 4 pregnant asthmatics with current asthma exacerbation (table 1). Pregnant women were recruited from the antenatal clinics at the John Hunter Hospital, as part of a larger randomised controlled trial (the ‘Managing asthma in pregnancy’ study16), while non-pregnant women were recruited from the Hunter Medical Research Institute Register and John Hunter Hospital respiratory clinics and staff (online supplement). Ethics approval was obtained from the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee and the University of Newcastle Research Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to participation.
Baseline characterisation included height, weight, lung function, smoking status, medication and asthma history. Inclusion criteria for all participants were female gender, aged 18–40 years and currently non-smokers. Pregnant women were recruited between 18 and 28 weeks gestation. Asthmatics had a doctor's diagnosis of asthma, current asthma symptoms and/or asthma medication use. Current and retrospective cold and flu symptoms were assessed using the Common Cold Questionnaire (CCQ) classifying subjects as (1) ‘no virus’, (2) ‘possible’ or (3) ‘probable’, based on cold/flu symptom score (eg, nasal, chest and throat symptoms).17
For asthmatics, characterisation also included assessment of current therapy and symptoms, OCS use, and asthma control using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and asthma control criteria from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines.18 Asthma exacerbations were defined as hospital admissions, unscheduled doctor's visits, % forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <80% predicted, loss of control (ACQ and GINA criteria) or OCS within the last 2 weeks. Blood samples were collected within 2 days from the onset of exacerbation. Women were excluded if they had concomitant chronic medical illness or lung disease (besides asthma), drug or alcohol dependence, inability to perform spirometry or cold/flu symptoms within 1 month prior to sample collection.
HRV43, a major group rhinovirus, was a clinical isolate obtained in 2005 and HRV1B, a minor group rhinovirus, was a gift from the Woolcock Institute of Medical Research in 2005. Viral stocks were propagated in RD-ICAMs (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, USA), similar to that described previously.19 Viral concentration was determined by tissue culture infective dose 50%, calculated using the Spearman–Karber formula. UV-inactivated virus was prepared as a negative control (online supplement).
PBMC isolation and culture
Whole blood was collected in EDTA tubes and PBMCs were isolated by density centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare Uppsala, Sweden), as per the manufacturer's instructions. PBMCs were resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute media (Invitrogen, Australia Pty Limited), 5% fetal bovine serum (SAFC Biosciences, Lenexa, Kansas, USA) and plated at a final concentration of 2.0×106 cells/ml in 24-well plates (sterile, tissue culture grade, NUNC, Denmark). Virus (live or UV-inactivated) was added at a multiplicity of infection 20, while the TLR3 agonist, polyinosine-polycytidylic acid (Poly(I:C); Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA), was used at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml and the TLR7 agonist, imiquimod (Invivogen, San Diego, California, USA), at a final concentration of 5 μg/ml. PBMCs were cultured with virus or TLR agonists for a total of 48 h, at 33°C and 5% CO2. No media changes were made during this period. Cellular suspensions were centrifuged at 550×g, 10 min and supernatants stored at −80°C for subsequent analyses.
Cell viability was assessed routinely by Trypan-blue exclusion, which discriminates live from dead cells based on cellular necrosis. Cell viability was also tested in optimisation experiments using PE Annexin V Apoptosis Kit I (BD Bioscience California, USA), as per manufacturer's instructions. This method uses annexin and 7AAD to determine apoptotic (annexin+ and 7AAD+) and necrotic (annexin− and 7AAD+) from viable cells (annexin− and 7AAD−). PBMCs consistently showed >90% viability using both methods, when cultured with HRV or TLR agonists, as well as in media alone (online supplement).
IFNα and IFNλ protein concentrations were measured from culture supernatants by ELISA, as per the manufacturer's instructions, and analysed on a Fluorostar Optima microplate reader (BMG Labtech). The assay range for IFNα (PBL Interferon Source, New Jersey, USA) was 12.5–500 pg/ml and for IFNλ (R&D Systems, Minnesota, USA) 15.6–1000 pg/ml. The minimal detectable dose was ≤10 pg/ml. The inter- and intra-assay variation was 8%. The %CV between duplicate samples was accepted when ≤5%.
RNA collected from nasal and throat swabs was used for detection of respiratory viruses by two-step PCR. Briefly, cDNA was transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsband, California, USA) followed by quantitation of target mRNA with the TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and virus-specific primers (online supplement).
Statistical analyses were performed using STATA11 (Stata Corp). For subject statistics, the Kwallis2 test was conducted to determine significant differences in characteristics between groups. For asthmatic groups, correlations between the IFN responses and %FEV or ACQ scores were tested using Kendall's τ. The rank-sum test was used to assess differences in IFN response with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in asthmatics. Simple linear regression was performed on asthmatic groups to determine if ICS dose was a determinant of IFN response. To determine if the study had sufficient power, the PS program (version 2.1.31) was used.20 For experimental statistics, significant differences between the groups were determined using the Kwallis2 test. Rank-sum tests were then conducted, comparing the healthy controls with each of the subsequent five groups (ie, P, A, PA, PP and PA+X). Significance was accepted when p<0.05 (online supplement). All protein data and figures were reported as median (IQR).
The women in this study had a mean age of 28.6±5.6 years, with no significant difference between the groups (table 1). Pregnant women were recruited mid to late third trimester, averaging 26.6±3.2. Asthmatics (pregnant and non-pregnant) had well-controlled asthma at the time of sample collection (ACQ scores <1.5), while currently exacerbating pregnant asthmatics showed loss of control with a significantly increased median ACQ score of 1.9 (0.95), (p<0.001). All asthmatic groups showed significantly lower %FEV and significantly higher blood IgE levels compared with the non-asthmatic groups (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in ICS doses between asthmatics. No subjects were taking OCS at the time of sample collection. No significant difference was seen in virus-induced IFN responses between asthmatics (pregnant and non-pregnant) currently on ICS treatment compared with those who were not and ICS dose was not a determinant of IFN response (p>0.10).
PBMCs from pregnant women have deficient IFNα and IFNλ responses to in vitro HRV infection
PBMCs from pregnant women stimulated with HRV43 (figure 1A) produced significantly less IFNα (median 206.5 (IQR 135.9), p=0.007) and IFNλ (0, (28.8), p<0.001) compared with PBMCs from healthy women (460.8 (193.8) and 136.4 (77.7), respectively). Similarly, in response to the minor group HRV1B (figure 1B), PBMCs from pregnant women produced significantly less IFNα (33.1 (70.5), p=0.019) and IFNλ (0 (5.4) p<0.001) compared with PBMCs from healthy non-pregnant women (127 (90.8) and 33.6 (59.3), respectively). To determine if this reduced IFN response persisted following pregnancy, PBMCs were isolated from women, 6–8 months post partum. HRV43-stimulated PBMCs from postpartum women (figure 1A) produced significantly less IFNλ compared with PBMCs from non-pregnant women (p=0.005). In response to HRV1B, there was significantly less IFNα produced by PBMCs from postpartum women compared with PBMCs from non-pregnant women (p=0.020).
TLR7 stimulation of PBMCs follows the same pattern as HRV-induced IFNα deficiency in pregnancy
Stimulating the TLR7 pathway (figure 2) induced the same pattern of IFNα response observed for live virus with PBMCs from pregnant women producing significantly less IFNα compared with PBMCs from healthy non-pregnant women (p=0.015). Stimulating the TLR3 pathway in PBMCs (online supplement) induced no significant difference in IFN response between the groups (p>0.05).
Asthma during pregnancy leads to reduced IFNλ response to HRV infection
There was no significant difference in HRV43-induced IFNα production in PBMCs obtained from asthmatics (307.3 (183.2)) or pregnant asthmatics (340.6 (326.7)) compared with PBMCs from non-pregnant women (460.8 (193.8)) (figure 3A). No significant difference was observed in IFNλ response from PBMCs of asthmatics (81.2 (95.6)) compared with cells of healthy non-pregnant women (136.4 (77.7)); however, a significant reduction in IFNλ was observed in PBMCs from pregnant asthmatics (46.4 (81.9), p=0.012). In response to HRV1B (figure 3B), a similar pattern was observed, with PBMCs from pregnant asthmatics producing significantly less IFNλ (6.33 (24.6)) compared with PBMCs from healthy non-pregnant women (33.6 (59.3), p=0.034). TLR7 stimulation of PBMCs from pregnant asthmatic women (online supplement) induced a similar IFN response as live virus.
Pregnant asthmatics with an in vivo exacerbation have deficient type I and III IFN responses to in vitro HRV infection
To see how PBMCs from pregnant women responded to in vitro rhinovirus infection during in vivo respiratory illness, PBMCs were collected from four pregnant asthmatics with cold/flu symptoms (ie, ‘probable virus’ score according to the CCQ) and current (within 2 days of onset) asthma exacerbations. All four women had ACQ scores >1.5 and showed loss of asthma control by GINA criteria (table 1). None required ED presentation or hospital admission, but all four had an unscheduled visit to their general practitioner or the respiratory research clinician. One woman had a %FEV below 80% and two were prescribed a course of OCS following their doctor's visit (commenced after study sample collection). Exacerbations were considered respiratory virus-induced, as all scored ‘probable’ to the CCQ. PCR analyses of nose and throat swabs during exacerbation confirmed one positive for human metapneumovirus infection and another for coronavirus.
In response to in vitro HRV43 infection (figure 4A), PBMCs from exacerbating pregnant asthmatics produced significantly less IFNα (135.5 (183), p=0.023) and IFNλ, (23.9 (38.4), p=0.007) compared with PBMC responses from healthy non-pregnant women (460.8 (193.8) and 136.4 (77.7), respectively). HRV1B-induced IFNα (figure 4B) was also significantly lower in PBMCs from exacerbating pregnant asthmatics (19.6 (39.8), p=0.010) compared with the response from healthy non-pregnant cells (127.7 (90.8)). No significant correlations were found between ACQ score or FEV and the IFN responses of PBMCs from all asthmatic groups during in vitro HRV infection.
This study shows that pregnant women have deficient type I and III antiviral IFN responses to rhinovirus infection compared with healthy non-pregnant women. A similar pattern of reduced IFNs was observed in PBMCs of pregnant women when stimulated with a TLR7 agonist. A consistent and significant reduction in IFNλ was seen in pregnant asthmatics in response to HRV and both IFNα and IFNλ were significantly reduced in response to HRV in pregnant women during asthma exacerbations. These results indicate innate immune dysfunction as a possible mechanism for the increased susceptibility of pregnant women to respiratory virus infections.
Our data add to current knowledge by demonstrating that PBMCs from pregnant women showed a marked decrease in innate IFNs in response to both HRV43 and HRV1B. The regulation and importance of type I IFNs during pregnancy, especially in response to respiratory virus infection, is still unclear, while the role of type III IFNs has yet to be explored. Epidemiological studies have identified pregnant women as having increased susceptibility to respiratory virus infections21 22 and the HRV-induced reduction of IFNα and IFNλ we observed in PBMCs from pregnant compared with non-pregnant women demonstrates an important mechanism explaining why pregnant women are more susceptible.
In response to both strains of HRV, IFNα and IFNλ production from PBMCs of postpartum women was significantly lower than that from PBMCs of non-pregnant women. This suggests a delay in returning to the ‘normal’ non-pregnant state, confirming heightened risk for respiratory viral infections in the postpartum period.23
TLR7, an ssRNA pathogen recognition receptor of the innate immune system,24 plays an important role in the type I and III IFN responses observed in this study. IFNα and IFNλ were most markedly reduced in TLR7-stimulated PBMCs from pregnant (asthmatic and non-asthmatic) and postpartum women, indicating pregnancy-associated immune alterations as the most important factor altering TLR7 function. Considering TLR7 is a key receptor for sensing viral RNA, alteration in TLR7 may be an important mechanism for reduced IFNs during respiratory virus infection in pregnancy. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are key producers of both IFNα and IFNλ and abundantly express TLR7,25–29 making them important targets for future studies. TLR7 alterations may be due to reduced numbers of TLR7-expressing cells like pDCs or a change in receptor activity. Oestrogen is known to increase during pregnancy and has been found to alter pDC activity and function,30 providing a plausible link among pregnancy, IFNs and TLR7 activity during respiratory virus infections.
This study shows that pregnancy, rather than asthma, appears to be the primary factor for a reduced innate IFN response. Systemic reduction of type I and III IFNs has been previously identified in asthmatic cells when stimulated with respiratory viruses.13–15 In our work, we did not observe a significant decrease in IFN production from HRV-stimulated PBMCs of asthmatics. This may be due to methodological differences in cell types used (whole blood, pBECs, BALF macrophages vs PBMCs), viral strains (RSV, HRV16 vs HRV43) and subject selection (male/female vs female only).
Several studies have reported increased susceptibility, symptom severity and duration of respiratory virus infections in pregnant asthmatics compared with pregnant non-asthmatics.10–12 We observed that in response to HRV43 and HRV1B, pregnant asthmatics showed significantly less IFNλ production compared with healthy non-pregnant women. This may help explain the increased frequency of exacerbations in pregnant asthmatics that has been observed compared with non-pregnant asthmatics.31 32
In this study, we found that in vitro HRV infection of PBMCs from pregnant asthmatics currently experiencing an in vivo exacerbation resulted in a significantly lower innate IFN response compared with PBMCs from healthy non-asthmatic women. When using an in vitro method to assess antiviral responses from pregnant asthmatics, a more realistic result may be achieved if the PBMCs are isolated from asthmatics during a current asthma exacerbation, rather than when their asthma is well controlled. The exposure of PBMCs in asthmatics to high levels of inflammatory cytokines prior to isolation (as would typically occur during in vivo virus-induced asthma exacerbations33), and the decreased IFNs in PBMCs of pregnant asthmatics (as we have shown in this in vitro study), lead to a significant reduction of IFNs when pregnant asthmatics are currently exacerbating. This provides useful insight into how a pregnant asthmatic is likely to respond to concurrent respiratory viral infection when the asthma is uncontrolled, further highlighting the importance of well-controlled asthma, especially during pregnancy. The reduction of IFNs seen in pregnant asthmatics was not likely due to steroid use, as no significant association was identified between steroid dose and IFN production in PBMCs, which is similar to previous findings.14
There are several limitations to our study, including the relatively small sample size, with n=10 participants per group. While these numbers are comparable to other studies looking at cellular IFN responses to in vitro virus stimulation,13–15 the small numbers may explain lack of significance, especially for the asthma data. This may also prevent us from making generalisable statements about entire populations and may make it difficult to detect a true interaction between steroid use and IFN response. However, the study was adequately powered to detect the difference in IFN response in pregnancy compared with non-pregnant women and provides useful mechanistic evidence for the epidemiological evidence of increased susceptibility to infection in pregnancy.
Pregnant women are classified as a ‘high risk’ group for respiratory infections. Since IFNs play a critical role in viral defence, reduced levels of type I or III IFNs could render one at increased risk of developing infections and concurrent illness. This study demonstrated that in pregnant women the induction of both IFNα and IFNλ was significantly reduced in response to HRV infection. This effect was observed for at least 6 months following childbirth providing an important insight into one possible mechanism whereby pregnant women are more susceptible to respiratory virus infections. Stimulating the TLR7 pathway in PBMCs induced a similar IFN response from PBMCs of pregnant women as observed by live HRV infection. Reduced type I and III IFNs in pregnant asthmatics, especially during current asthma exacerbations, also provide an explanation as to why pregnant asthmatics experience an increase in severe respiratory symptoms during virus infection. Understanding this alteration in innate immunity will enable the future development of effective target strategies aimed at IFN production, helping to prevent or at least control virus infection during pregnancy, thereby improving health outcomes for both the mother and the baby.
Karen McLaughlin and Kelly Steel were the clinical nurses who helped with recruitment of the pregnant participants for this study. Patrick Macelduff was the statistician who provided input on the methods of data analyses.
See Editorial, p 189
Funding The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC), Australia, and Australian Postgraduate Association (APA) PhD Scholarship, NSW, Australia, grant number 455593 and 455626, to provide financial support required for recruiting, consumables, staff, etc, needed to undertake the research project.
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. The order of the authors has been updated.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee and the University of Newcastle Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.