Background β-Blocker therapy has been shown to improve survival among patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and congestive heart failure (CHF) and is underused among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Evidence regarding the optimal use of β-blocker therapy during an acute exacerbation of COPD is particularly weak.
Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥40 years with IHD, CHF or hypertension who were hospitalised for an acute exacerbation of COPD from 1 January 2006 to 1 December 2007 at 404 acute care hospitals throughout the USA. We examined the association between β-blocker therapy and in-hospital mortality, initiation of mechanical ventilation after day 2 of hospitalisation, 30-day all-cause readmission and length of stay.
Results Of 35 082 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 29% were treated with β blockers in the first two hospital days, including 22% with β1-selective and 7% with non-selective β blockers. In a propensity-matched analysis, there was no association between β-blocker therapy and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09), 30-day readmission (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03) or late mechanical ventilation (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24). However, when compared with β1 selective β blockers, receipt of non-selective β blockers was associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.44).
Conclusions Among patients with IHD, CHF or hypertension, continuing β1-selective β blockers during hospitalisation for COPD appears to be safe. Until additional evidence becomes available, β1-selective β blockers may be superior to treatment with a non-selective β blocker.
- heart failure
- ischaemic heart disease
- β blockers
- β2 agonists
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is the key question?
In patients hospitalised with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coexistent ischaemic heart disease (IHD) or congestive heart failure (CHF) is the receipt of a β blocker associated with better outcomes and does the cardioselectivity of the β blocker matter?
What is the bottom line?
There was no association between β-blocker therapy and in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission or late mechanical ventilation. However, when compared with β1-selective β blockers, receipt of non-selective β blockers was associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission.
Why read on?
Patients with COPD often have CHF or IHD and this combination presents complex therapeutic challenges. Continuing β1-selective β blockers during hospitalisation for acute COPD exacerbation appears to be safe.
The combination of COPD treatment often coexists with treatment for congestive heart failure (CHF) or ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and presents complex therapeutic challenges. β2 Agonists, which are frequently used in the treatment of COPD, have the potential for adverse cardiovascular effects including ischaemic events and arrhythmias.3–5 β-Blocker therapy improves symptoms and survival among patients with IHD and CHF6 ,7 but is frequently withheld in patients with COPD because of concerns that it may diminish the bronchodilator effect of β2 agonists and aggravate bronchospastic symptoms.8 ,9 Although a Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that β1-selective β blockade was safe,10 ,11 patients with COPD have half the odds of being treated with β blockers during acute myocardial infarction (MI) than those without COPD12 and only 35% of patients with CHF and COPD receive β-blocker therapy.13 ,14 Physicians may be even more reluctant to continue β-blocker therapy during an acute exacerbation of COPD (AE-COPD) when a patient's respiratory status is most tenuous.
During an AE-COPD, patients may be particularly vulnerable to develop acute cardiac events15 due to increased use in β2 agonists, tachycardia and hypoxaemia. The addition of a cardioselective β blocker may have a cardioprotective effect in this population, blunting the cardiac toxicity of the β2 agonists. However, information about the effectiveness and safety of β blockers is particularly limited for patients hospitalised with AE-COPD who are treated with β2 agonists.
To address this uncertainty, we evaluated the association of β-blocker treatment with outcomes among a large cohort of patients with IHD or CHF who were hospitalised for an AE-COPD. As a control, we also included patients with hypertension (HTN), in whom we expected to find no mortality benefit from β blockers. Hypothesising that the β1 selectivity of the β blocker is associated with the severity of adverse respiratory effects, we also compared the outcomes of patients treated with a β1-selective β blocker with those who were treated with non-selective β blockers.
Data source, setting and patients
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data collected from 404 hospitals that participate in Perspective (Premier Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, USA), an inpatient administrative database. This dataset was described in detail elsewhere.16 Premier's Perspective data warehouse provides detailed information about all medications dispensed, laboratory tests ordered and procedures, capturing patients' complete billing and coding history during their hospital admission. It contains physician and hospital characteristics and data available from standard hospital claims: demographics, principal and secondary diagnosis and procedures, discharge status and source of admission. Hospitals are representative of all regions of the USA and are mostly small to medium size, urban and non-teaching facilities.
We included patients 40 years or older (because younger patients may have asthma not COPD), discharged from a Premier hospital between 1 January 2006 and 1 December 2007, with a principal diagnosis of AE-COPD as defined by the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM; procedure codes 491.21, 491.22) or emphysema (ICD-9-CM code 492.8) or a principal diagnosis of respiratory failure (ICD-9-CM codes 518.81, 518.82, 518.84) and a secondary diagnosis of AE-COPD or emphysema. We restricted our analysis to patients with a secondary diagnosis of IHD or HF, patients for whom β-blocker treatment may be beneficial. We also included patients with HTN as a control group. Our initial hypothesis was that receipt of a β blocker would be associated with reduced mortality in patients with IHD and CHF but not in patients with HTN only, since there is no evidence to suggest that β-blocker therapy improves mortality in HTN, other than through the general control of high blood pressure. To increase the likelihood that the patients identified on the basis of ICD-9-CM codes were being treated for an exacerbation of COPD, we limited the analysis to those who received treatment with inhaled β2 agonists and systemic corticosteroids on the first or second day of the hospitalisation. Patients on mechanical ventilation and those admitted directly to an intensive care unit were excluded because β blockers may have been discontinued since clinicians may be particularly hesitant to use β blockers in patients with severe respiratory decompensation. We also excluded patients treated with large doses of intravenous diuretics because this generally reflects treatment of acute CHF exacerbation. In addition, we excluded patients who were hospitalised for <3 days, because late mechanical ventilation was assessed after day 2, patients who survived <3 days, and patients who were transferred from or to another facility. If a patient had more than one eligible admission during the period of the study we randomly selected one to avoid survival bias.
Treatment with β blockers
Receipt of a β blocker was defined as at least one dose administered orally during any of the first two hospital days. We excluded from the analysis patients who received intravenous β blockers because this may represent acute treatment for an arrhythmia or ischaemic event. Patients who had β-blocker treatment initiated on hospital day 3 or later were grouped with those who did not receive a β blocker during hospitalisation because late treatment may be a marker for an acute cardiac ischaemic or arrhythmic event.
Other treatments and factors
In addition to patient demographics, primary payer and principal diagnosis, we classified comorbidities using the Healthcare Cost and Utilisation Project Comorbidity Software, V.3.1 and 3.2.17 We examined receipt of a broad range of therapies and diagnostic tests on the first 2 days of hospitalisation, including medications frequently used for AE-COPD (eg, anticholinergic bronchodilators, long-acting β agonists) and medications frequently used for cardiovascular disease (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone antagonists, digoxin, antiplatelets, calcium channel blockers, warfarin), non-invasive ventilation, arterial blood gas and brain natriuretic peptide test. We defined early therapy as treatments in the first 2 days of hospitalisation. For each hospital, we recorded bed count, teaching status, geographic region, and whether the institution served an urban or rural population.
Mortality and other outcomes
The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included late mechanical ventilation (defined as invasive mechanical ventilation started on day 3 or later), length of stay and 30-day all-cause readmission. We also recorded acute ischaemic cardiac events during hospitalisation, defined as secondary diagnosis of acute MI, intermediate coronary syndrome or any receipt of therapies or procedures commonly used for the management of an acute cardiac event (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors thrombolytics, angiography, cardiac revascularisation) started after hospital day 2.
We initially used univariate and bivariate comparisons using the appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests. We developed a series of multivariable predictive models as a function of patient, treatment and hospital characteristics. Logit link functions were used for the outcomes of mortality, late ventilation and 30-day readmission and the identity link for log transformed length of stay. Generalised estimating equation models were used to account for clustering of patients within hospitals.
To further reduce the threat of selection bias (patients with the most severe AE-COPD clinical presentations might be those least likely to receive β blockers), we developed a propensity model in which early β-blocker treatment was considered the outcome, and included all patient characteristics, early treatments and diagnostic tests, comorbidities, hospital characteristics and selected interaction terms as independent variables. Unadjusted, covariate adjusted and propensity score adjusted models were evaluated. In addition, we matched patients who received treatment with β blockers with those with similar propensity who did not receive early β-blocker therapy. The propensity matched analysis was considered the primary analysis.
To further address the threat of confounding by indication we also applied an instrumental variable analysis (IVA). We used a grouped-treatment approach, a form of IVA, in which all patients treated at the same hospital are assigned a probability of treatment with a β blocker equal to the overall treatment rate at that hospital—the grouped rate.18 This grouped rate was substituted for individual patient exposure to treatment in the logistic regression model.
To assess for heterogeneity in the association between β-blocker therapy and outcome according to the type of heart disease we tested for interactions between β-blocker therapy and HTN, IHD and CHF. In a final set of analysis, we developed a new propensity model among β-blocker treated patients only for the probability of being treated with a non-selective β blocker. We used propensity score matching to compare the outcomes associated with the choice of β1-selective or non-selective β blockers. All analyses were performed using SAS V.9.2.
The institutional review board at Baystate Medical Center reviewed and approved the study protocol.
We identified 35 082 patients who met all the inclusion criteria (figure 1). The median age was 72 years, 59% were women, 75% were white and AE-COPD was the principal diagnosis in 87% of cases (table 1). Among the entire cohort, 43% had HTN, 26% IHD with or without HTN, 31% had CHF with or without IHD or HTN and 11% had a history of MI.
A total of 10 070 patients (29%) received β blockers within the first 2 hospital days, including 22% who were treated with cardioselective and 7% with non-selective β blockers. There were 1379 patients who received a β blocker starting on day 3 or later and were analysed in the group of patients who did not receive early β-blocker therapy. The most commonly used β1-selective β blockers were metoprolol (74%) and atenolol (23.5%) and non-selective β blockers were carvedilol (85%) and propranolol (7.2%). Among the 8974 patients with a diagnosis of IHD, 33% were treated with β blockers, 82% of which were β1 selective; among the 10 921 with a diagnosis of CHF, 37% were treated with β blockers, 64% of which were β1 selective. Across the 404 hospitals the median rate of early use of oral β-blocker treatment was 27%.
Compared with patients who were not treated with a β blocker during the first 2 days, treated patients were older, less likely to have a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure and had fewer COPD admissions in the prior year. They had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including diabetes, atrial fibrillation, renal failure and peripheral vascular disease, were more likely to be treated with loop diuretics, digoxin, statins, antiplatelets and warfarin, but less likely to receive treatment with methylxanthines, non-invasive ventilation or to undergo an arterial blood gas analysis (table 1).
A total of 197 patients (2%) who received early treatment with β blockers died during hospitalisation and 191 patients (1.9%) had mechanical ventilation initiated after day 2 of hospitalisation whereas 620 patients (2.5%) from the untreated group died and 543 patients (2.2%) experienced late mechanical ventilation. In total, 865 patients had an acute coronary event during hospitalisation, including 3.2% of those who received early β-blocker treatment and 2.2% of those untreated (table 2).
In the analysis accounting only for within hospital clustering patients treated with β blockers had an OR of mortality of 0.79 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.93) compared with patients not treated with β blockers. Adjustment for covariate attenuated the apparent effect of β-blocker therapy by a small amount 0.83 (0.70 to 0.99) and the covariate and propensity score adjusted model changed the estimate to 0.84 (0.70 to 1.00). Overall 9161 (90.8%) of the patients treated with β blockers within the first two hospital days were successfully matched to patients with a similar propensity score who did not receive treatment by day 2. All patient, treatment and hospital covariates were fully balanced (table 1). In this matched cohort, the effect of β blockers on in-hospital mortality was attenuated and no longer significant (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09).
In the multivariable and propensity matched analyses, receipt of β blockers was not associated with late ventilation or all-cause readmission within 30 days (figure 2). Development of acute coronary events during hospitalisation (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.20) and length of stay were also not different between the two groups (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.994 to 0.995).
Interaction between early β-blocker treatment and type of cardiovascular disease (HTN, IHD and HF) was assessed in multivariable adjusted outcome models. Interaction was non-significant in mortality (p value=0.9), late ventilation (p value=0.7) and all-cause readmission (among survivors) (p value=0.5) models.
In the sensitivity analysis which used the hospital β-blocker prescribing rate as a form of instrumental variable, the risk of in-hospital death was not significantly different between the treated and untreated groups (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.72), but treatment with β blockers was associated with an increased risk of late ventilation (OR 5.72, 95% CI 1.47 to 22.73) and 30-day readmission (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.30).
Cardioselective versus non-selective β blockers
Overall 94.4% of patients treated with a non-selective β blocker were matched based on propensity with a patient treated with a β1-selective β blocker. In this propensity-matched grouped, β1 selectivity of the β blocker was not associated with the risk of mortality or late ventilation. However, compared with patients treated with a β1-selective agent, patients treated with a non-selective β blocker had 25% increased odds of 30-day readmission (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.44) (table 3).
In this large observational study of more than 35 000 patients hospitalised with HTN, IHD or CHF who were hospitalised for AE-COPD, treatment with β blockers during the first 2 days of hospitalisation was not associated with the risk of in-hospital death, late mechanical ventilation, all-cause 30-day readmission or acute coronary events during hospitalisation. This pattern did not vary based on the type of heart disease or prior MI status. However, compared with treatment with β1-selective β blockers, therapy with non-selective β blockers was associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission.
Among patients with a history of MI or CHF, there is clear evidence that β-blocker therapy substantially reduces mortality and morbidity.6 ,7 However, because β blockers can accentuate bronchospastic symptoms and may diminish the bronchodilatory effects of β2 agonists, physicians are often hesitant to treat patients with COPD with β blockers.12 ,14
In this study, only 40% of patients with AE-COPD who had an evidence-based indication for chronic β-blocker therapy (an ICD-9 code of prior MI) were given a β blocker during hospitalisation. These findings are similar to other studies that have reported the underuse of β blockers in patients with acute MI or CHF and COPD.12 ,14
Several recent observational studies have reported that long-term use of β blockers is associated with better survival in patients with CHF or prior MI and concurrent COPD.19–21 In addition, a recent single-centre analysis of 825 patients admitted with AE-COPD22 found a 40% reduction in mortality in patients who received β-blocker therapy during hospitalisation, raising the possibility that the common practice of withholding β blockers may be harmful. However, the very large effect estimate may have been due to immortal time bias, as well as selection of the last hospitalisation for AE-COPD, over-representing hospitalisations resulting in death.23 In contrast, our analysis suggested little if any benefit of β-blocker therapy on hospital mortality. This difference is likely due to several factors, including our selection of patients with an indication for β-blocker therapy, the large sample size from multiple hospitals, and adjustment for numerous treatments, tests and patient characteristics that could confound the relationship between β-blocker treatment and mortality. Patients with AE-COPD on β blockers may have been those most likely to receive the therapy, that is, those with more advance cardiac disease and an increased risk of hospital deaths. Carvedilol prescription may in fact be selected for those patients who had more severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. This idea is supported by the fact that patients receiving β-blocker therapy were more likely to be treated with ‘cardiovascular’ medications (loop diuretics, digoxin, statins, antiplatelets and warfarin) and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including diabetes, renal failure and peripheral vascular disease.
There is growing evidence that β1-selective β blockers do not induce bronchospasm in patients with COPD.10 ,11 ,24 Although there are no robust data supporting the safety of non-selective β blockers in COPD, in our analysis 7% of all patients and 37% of patients with CHF who were treated with a β-blocker received a non-selective β blocker, primarily carvedilol. Compared with β1-selective agents, non-selective β blockers were associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission. These findings are not surprising given prior studies that have found that non-selective β blockers increase hospitalisations in patients with COPD, decrease forced expiratory volume in 1 s and may inhibit bronchodilator response to β2 agonists.9 ,19 ,25 Taken together our analyses suggest that continuing a β1-selective β blocker among patients who are chronic users appears to be safe during a hospitalisation for AE-COPD. However, our findings also raise additional doubts about the safety of prescribing non-selective β blockers to patients hospitalised with COPD.
There were several limitations to this study. First, we did not have access to information about the initial gravity of COPD or the underlying severity of the cardiovascular condition, both of which might have influenced β-blocker prescribing. However, we controlled for a large number of potential confounders, including cardiovascular medications that might serve as proxies for disease severity. We also adjusted for medications frequently used for AE-COPD, prior admissions for COPD, the need for arterial blood gas testing and use of non-invasive ventilation. We attempted to overcome selection bias using several robust analytical strategies, including propensity score adjustment, matching and IVA. Second, the dataset is based on claims data and the ascertainment of comorbidities and potential contraindications is dependent on physicians' documentation and coding; however, we did not rely only on ICD-9 codes but also on daily charge files for therapies and procedures.
Third, in the sensitivity analysis, we found that higher rates of β-blocker use at the hospital level were associated with increased risk of late ventilation and 30-day readmission. Although we used IVA in an attempt to minimise confounding/selection bias due to unmeasured factors, there was little variability of the hospital β-blocker treatment rate (median 27%, IQR 22–34%), resulting in only a weak instrument. Finally, we did not have access to ambulatory prescribing records, and therefore were unable to determine whether patients who did not receive a β blocker in the first 2 days of hospitalisation did not receive them as outpatients or if they had their medicine withheld out of concern that this could result in further deterioration of their respiratory condition. Withholding β-blocker therapy in patients who are chronic users may be associated with an increase in mortality.26–28
In summary, our results suggest that among patients with COPD and coexistent IHD, CHF or HTN, continuing β1-selective β-blocker therapy among chronic users appears to be safe during a hospitalisation for AE-COPD. Until additional evidence becomes available, clinicians should consider choosing β1-selective rather than non-selective β blockers in patients with COPD. Given the large number of patients with COPD and concurrent CHF and IHD, clinical trials assessing the risk–benefit of β blockers in this population would be valuable.
We thank David Kent and John Griffith from Tufts University School of Medicine for their valuable input into interpretation of the results.
Funding MSS is supported by KM1 CA156726 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant UL1 RR025752. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of NIH or NCI. The NIH or NCI had no role in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. DHA is supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs. DHA received grant funding from Gilead Sciences for work that is unrelated to this manuscript, and is a research consultant for Bosch LLC.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by IRB of Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.