Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correspondence
Safety of long-acting β2-agonists in asthma
Free
  1. Fernando Maria de Benedictis,
  2. Ines Carloni
  1. Department of Mother and Child Health, Salesi Childrens Hospital, Ancona, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Professor Fernando Maria de Benedictis, Department of Mother and Child Health, Salesi Childrens Hospital, Via Corridoni, 11, Ancona 60123, Italy; debenedictis{at}ospedaliriuniti.marche.it

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In their review on the safety of long-acting β2-agonists in asthma, Rodrigo et al 1 report that severe asthma-related complications were more frequent in patients receiving formoterol 24 μg twice daily (0.9%) than in those receiving formoterol 12 μg twice daily (0.4%) or placebo (0.2%) in a multicentre randomised trial.2 The original study reports different percentages of asthma-related complications in the treatment groups (table 1), and both serious asthma exacerbations and a combined outcome including serious asthma exacerbations, asthma-related discontinuations and emergency visits for asthma did not show statistically significant differences between the treatment groups.2 Consequently, the statement by Rodrigo et al 1 that higher doses of formoterol are associated with an increase in serious asthma exacerbations is disputable. Concerns about the safety of long-acting β2-agonists therapy are a matter of ongoing discussion, and a recently promoted FDA study3 may hopefully clarify the risk associated with the regular use of long-acting β2-agonists for the treatment of asthma.

Table 1

Respiratory-related severe asthma exacerbations (requiring hospitalisation)

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.