Article Text

Original article
Induced sputum genes associated with spirometric and radiological disease severity in COPD ex-smokers
Free
  1. Dave Singh1,
  2. Steven M Fox2,
  3. Ruth Tal-Singer3,
  4. Jonathan Plumb1,
  5. Stewart Bates2,
  6. Peter Broad2,
  7. John H Riley4,
  8. Bartolome Celli5 On behalf of the ECLIPSE Investigators
  1. 1University of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, University Hospital Of South Manchester Foundation Trust, UK
  2. 2GlaxoSmithKline, Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, UK
  3. 3GlaxoSmithKline, Respiratory Therapy Area, Philadelphia, USA
  4. 4GlaxoSmithKline, Respiratory Medicines Development Centre,Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK
  5. 5Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dave Singh, University of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of South Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; dsingh{at}meu.org.uk

Abstract

Background Induced sputum is used to sample inflammatory cells, predominantly neutrophils and macrophages, from the airways of COPD patients. The author's aim was to identify candidate genes associated with the degree of airflow obstruction and the extent of emphysema by expression profiling, and then to confirm these findings for selected candidates using PCR and protein analysis.

Methods Two sputum studies were performed in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 2–4 COPD ex-smokers from the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) cohort. First, gene array profiling at baseline in samples from 148 patients. The findings were replicated in a separate population of 176 patients using real-time PCR. The findings for one selected gene IL-18R were further analysed using immunohistochemistry in lung tissue and induced sputum from patients outside the ECLIPSE cohort.

Results Gene expression profiling revealed changes in 277 genes associated with GOLD stage 2 versus 3 and 4, and 198 genes with changes associated with the degree of emphysema (p<0.01 for each gene). Twelve of these candidate genes were analysed by PCR in the replication cohort, with significant changes (p<0.05) observed for 11 genes. IL-18R protein expression was higher on alveolar macrophages in lung tissue of COPD patients (mean 23.2%) compared to controls (mean ex-smokers 2% and non-smokers 2.5%).

Conclusion Gene expression profiling in sputum cells identified candidate genes that may play roles in molecular mechanisms associated with COPD. The replication by PCR and protein in different studies confirms these findings, and highlights a potential role for IL-18R upregulation in severe COPD.

  • COPD mechanisms
  • emphysema
  • innate immunity

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Web Only Data thx.2010.153767

    Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Web Only Data thx.2010.153767

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • Funding This study was funded by GlaxoSmithkline.

  • Competing interests Dave Singh has worked on a consultancy basis for GSK, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, CIPLA, Allmiral, ROCHE and Forest. He has received lecture fees from GSK, Chiesi, Boehringer Ingleheim and AstraZeneca. He receives industry sponsored grants from Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, GSK, UCB, AstraZeneca and Novartis. Bartolome Celli conflicts: Grants to the Division I head to complete research studies from GlaxoSmith Kline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Forrest Medical, Astra Zeneca, advisory board payments from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Almirall, Astra Zeneca, and lecture fees from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Almirall. Steven Fox, Ruth Tal-Singer, Stewart Bates, Peter Broad and John Riley are employees of GSK.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the local ethics committee for each of the participating sites.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.