rss
Thorax 66:88 doi:10.1136/thx.2010.152744
  • PostScript
  • Letter

Editors' response

  1. Ian Pavord2
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK
  2. 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Thoracic Surgery and Allergy, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK
  1. Correspondence to Andrew Bush, Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK; A.Bush{at}rbht.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 4 October 2010
  • Published Online First 19 November 2010

The review article by Chapman et al1 has provoked a vigorous correspondence,2–5 amongst other things calling on Thorax to ‘respond appropriately’ and even withdraw the manuscript. We inherited the manuscript from our predecessors and played no part in its commissioning or review. However, we are quite clear that the appropriate response is not to withdraw the manuscript, but …


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.