Article Text

PDF

Letter
Bronchoalveolar lavage immunodiagnosis for tuberculosis suspects in Europe and Africa
  1. Christoph Lange1,
  2. Aik Bossink2,
  3. Ralf Eberhardt3,
  4. Delia Goletti4,
  5. Claudia Jafari1,
  6. Irene Latorre5,
  7. Detlef Kirsten6,
  8. Monica Losi7,
  9. Giovanni B Migliori8,
  10. Giovanni Sotgiu9
  1. 1Clinical Infectious Diseases, Research Center Borstel, Germany
  2. 2Pulmonary Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  3. 3Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Heidelberg Thoraxclinic, Heidelberg, Germany
  4. 4Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy
  5. 5Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Ciber Enfermedades Respiratorias, Institutio de Salud Carlos III, Badalona, Spain
  6. 6Pneumology, Hospital Großhansdorf, Großhandorf, Germany
  7. 7Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
  8. 8WHO Collaborating Centre for TB and Lung Diseases, Fondazione S. Maugeri, Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy
  9. 9Hygiene and Preventive Medicine Institute, University of Sassari, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Christoph Lange, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Research Center Borstel, Parkallee 35, D-23845 Borstel, Germany; clange{at}fz-borstel.de

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We read with interest the article by Dheda et al1 who followed our approach for a rapid diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot)2 in a country of high tuberculosis incidence, including individuals with HIV-1 infection.

The authors report a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 94.7% of the BAL ELISpot (T-SPOT.TB test) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in suspects with scarce or negative acid-fast bacilli (AFB) sputum smears. This observation is important, as it confirms the findings of other recent studies performed in low tuberculosis incidence countries where flow cytometric assays were performed with BAL cells in order to obtain a rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis.3 4 However, flow cytometry is technically more demanding and time-consuming than ELISpot.

Results from the largest study performed on this topic to date, a recent prospective multicentre TBNET study, showed that the BAL ELISpot is superior to blood ELISpot, tuberculin skin test and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific nucleic acid amplification to diagnose sputum smear-negative tuberculosis.5

However, an important difference between this study and that of Dheda et al is the high frequency of indeterminate BAL ELIspot test results (9.2% vs 33.7%) that could be related to different cell processing procedures. Fifty-four percent of indeterminate results in the cohort from South Africa were due to lack of sufficient numbers of cells or failure of the positive control, interestingly unrelated to the patients' HIV serostatus. In 46.4% of the South African cohort and 82.1% of the European cohort the reason for indeterminate results was a high number of cells already producing interferon γ (IFNγ) without stimulation in the negative control. These are probably prestimulated terminally differentiated, cytokine-secreting effector T cells.

Different definitions of indeterminate test results are another important explanation for the observed variability between the two studies. When we reanalysed the data set of the TBNET study with the cut-offs used by Dheda et al, the sensitivity and specificity of the BAL ELIspot for the detection of sputum AFB smear-negative tuberculosis changed from 90.9% and 79.9% to 87.2% and 88.1%, and the frequency of indeterminate test results increased to 30.5%. Therefore, it would be interesting to know whether application of the cut-offs used in the TBNET study will substantially reduce the proportion of indeterminate test results in the study by Dheda et al.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Linked articles 126185.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Medico Ethical Review Boards of all TBNET study centres involved.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    Richard N van Zyl-Smit Richard Meldau Keertan Dheda