Article Text

Download PDFPDF

A simple, valid, numerical score for grading chest x-ray severity in adult smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
Free
  1. Anna P Ralph1,2,
  2. Muhamed Ardian3,4,5,
  3. Andri Wiguna4,5,
  4. Graeme P Maguire6,
  5. Niels G Becker2,
  6. Glen Drogumuller7,
  7. Michael J Wilks8,
  8. Govert Waramori4,
  9. Emiliana Tjitra9,
  10. Sandjaja9,
  11. Enny Kenagalem3,10,
  12. Gysje J Pontororing10,
  13. Nicholas M Anstey1,11,
  14. Paul M Kelly1,2
  1. 1Global Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Australia
  2. 2National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health Research, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University, Australia
  3. 3District Health Authority, Timika, Papua Province, Indonesia
  4. 4International SOS, Timika, Papua Province, Indonesia
  5. 5Public Health & Malaria Control Department, PT Freeport Indonesia, Papua Province, Indonesia
  6. 6School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
  7. 7Department of Radiology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory, Australia
  8. 8Radiology Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia
  9. 9National Institute of Health Research and Development, Jakarta, Indonesia
  10. 10Menzies School of Health Research-National Institute of Health Research and Development Research Program, and District Ministry of Health, Timika, Papua Province, Indonesia
  11. 11Division of Medicine, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anna Ralph, International Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Northern Territory, 0811, Australia; anna.ralph{at}menzies.edu.au

Abstract

Background The grading of radiological severity in clinical trials in tuberculosis (TB) remains unstandardised. The aim of this study was to generate and validate a numerical score for grading chest x-ray (CXR) severity and predicting response to treatment in adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB.

Methods At a TB clinic in Papua, Indonesia, serial CXRs were performed at diagnosis, 2 and 6 months in 115 adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB. Radiographic findings predictive of 2-month sputum microscopy status were used to generate a score. The validity of the score was then assessed in a second data set of 139 comparable adults with TB, recruited 4 years later at the same site. Relationships between the CXR score and other measures of TB severity were examined.

Results The estimated proportion of lung affected and presence of cavitation, but not cavity size or other radiological findings, significantly predicted outcome and were combined to derive a score given by percentage of lung affected plus 40 if cavitation was present. As well as predicting 2-month outcome, scores were significantly associated with sputum smear grade at diagnosis (p<0.001), body mass index, lung function, haemoglobin, exercise tolerance and quality of life (p<0.02 for each). In the validation data set, baseline CXR score predicted 2-month smear status significantly more accurately than did the proportion of lung affected alone. In both data sets, CXR scores decreased over time (p<0.001).

Conclusion This simple, validated method for grading CXR severity in adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB correlates with baseline clinical and microbiological severity and response to treatment, and is suitable for use in clinical trials.

  • Tuberculosis
  • chest radiograph
  • x-ray
  • score

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding Australian Respiratory Council, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (Covance award), Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Human Research Ethics Committees of the NT Department of Health & Families and Menzies School of Health Research, Australia, the Australian National University, and the National Institute for Health Research and Development, Indonesia.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.