Article Text

PDF

Letter
Caesarean section and asthma: alternative explanations?
  1. J C van der Wouden1,
  2. R M D Bernsen2
  1. 1
    Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Department of Community Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  1. Correspondence to Dr J C van der Wouden, P O Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands; j.vanderwouden{at}erasmusmc.nl

Statistics from Altmetric.com

In their detailed analysis of almost 3000 children followed from birth until the age of 8 years, Roduit et al1 showed that children born by caesarean section have a higher risk of asthma than those born by vaginal delivery. Surprisingly, the authors offer only one explanation for this finding—namely, delayed microbial colonisation—whereas we believe other mechanisms cannot be excluded.

As an alternative hypothesis we propose to investigate the possibility of confounding by factors already present at/before birth. This hypothesis is supported by studies showing that immunological parameters in cord blood are different between children born by vaginal delivery and those born by caesarean section.2 One such factor could be head circumference which has been repeatedly found to be related to increased IgE and the development of asthma and related disorders,3 4 5 and babies born by caesarean section probably have relatively high values.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.