rss
Thorax 64:326-331 doi:10.1136/thx.2008.097352
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Dietary counselling and food fortification in stable COPD: a randomised trial

  1. C E Weekes1,
  2. P W Emery2,
  3. M Elia3
  1. 1
    Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2
    Nutritional Sciences Division, King’s College London, London, UK
  3. 3
    Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  1. Dr C E Weekes, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK; elizabeth.weekes{at}gstt.nhs.uk
  • Received 12 February 2008
  • Accepted 20 November 2008
  • Published Online First 15 December 2008

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with a poor prognosis, yet evidence to support the role of dietary counselling and food fortification is lacking. A study was undertaken to assess the impact of dietary counselling and food fortification on outcome in outpatients with COPD who are at risk of malnutrition.

Methods: A randomised controlled unblinded trial was performed in 59 outpatients with COPD (6 months intervention and 6 months follow-up). The intervention group received dietary counselling and advice on food fortification and the controls received a dietary advice leaflet. Outcome measures were nutritional status, respiratory and skeletal muscle strength, respiratory function, perceived dyspnoea, activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life.

Results: The intervention group consumed more energy (difference 194 kcal/day; p = 0.02) and protein (difference 11.8 g/day; p<0.001) than controls. The intervention group gained weight during the intervention period and maintained weight during follow-up; the controls lost weight throughout the study. Significant differences were observed between the groups in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score (difference 10.1; p = 0.02), Short Form-36 health change score (difference 19.2; p = 0.029) and Medical Research Council dyspnoea score (difference 1.0; p = 0.03); the difference in ADL score approached statistical significance (difference 1.5; p = 0.06). No differences were observed between groups in respiratory function or skeletal and respiratory muscle strength. Improvements in some variables persisted for 6 months beyond the intervention period.

Conclusion: Dietary counselling and food fortification resulted in weight gain and improvements in outcome in nutritionally at-risk outpatients with COPD, both during and beyond the intervention period.

Footnotes

  • ▸ Additional Methods and Results details are published online only at http://thorax.bmj.com/content/vol64/issue4

  • Funding: During the conduct of this study CEW received Research Training Fellowship awards from the London Regional NHS Executive and the Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital Charitable Foundation.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Trust ethics committee (EC97/363) and the University Hospital Lewisham ethics committee (03/08/12).