Article Text


Azithromycin therapy for neutrophilic airways disease: myth or magic?
  1. Saad F Idris1,
  2. Edwin R Chilvers1,
  3. Charles Haworth2,
  4. Damian McKeon1,2,
  5. Alison M Condliffe1
  1. 1
    Respiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2
    Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  1. Dr A M Condliffe, Respiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 157 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; amc46{at}

Statistics from

The anti-inflammatory potential of macrolides was first appreciated with the successful use of erythromycin in the treatment of diffuse panbronchiolitis, a disease principally affecting the Japanese, and characterised by a persistent neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate of the bronchi. While there are only limited data on the efficacy of other macrolides in treating this condition,1 the observation has generated considerable interest in examining the role of macrolides in other respiratory diseases where chronic airways inflammation is a prominent feature.

Azithromycin (AZM) is a 15-membered macrolactam ring macrolide which, in randomised controlled studies, has demonstrated a beneficial role in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF)25 despite its lack of direct bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. More recent (albeit smaller) studies have suggested a role for AZM in the treatment of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)6 and asthma,7 with a common finding in both being its ability to reduce airway neutrophilia. Such observations have focused attention on understanding how AZM and other macrolides may modulate host-pathogen interactions in chronic lung infection and their role as an immunomodulatory agent in both respiratory and non-respiratory settings. Clinical studies have usually been designed to study an individual macrolide agent, but it is likely that the findings in such trials represent a “class effect”. Although some in vitro experiments have suggested subtle differences between individual class members, the in vivo significance of these observations is uncertain.


The direct antimicrobial activity of macrolides against Gram-positive bacteria results from inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis. Although AZM has little direct activity against Gram-negative organisms, it has been shown to modulate bacterial virulence factors and thus affect the outcome of chronic infections with organisms such as P aeruginosa. Quorum sensing is a sophisticated mechanism whereby pathogen-derived molecules act as auto-inducers and trigger a variety of biological functions such as biofilm formation and production of virulence factors. AZM reduces the transcription of lasI and rhlI, two vital components of the quorum sensing system, resulting in reduced generation of the auto-inducer molecule HSL.8 Furthermore, in vitro studies have shown that AZM-exposed P aeruginosa displays impaired mobility and oxidative stress responses,9 perhaps contributing to the reduced biofilm formation observed in AZM-treated cultures.10 More recently, sub-MIC concentrations of AZM have also been shown to decrease formation of Haemophilus influenzae biofilms.11

In CFTR-null mice infected with P aeruginosa, AZM suppressed the production of virulence factors, improved the clearance of P aeruginosa biofilms and reduced the severity of lung pathology.12 In a separate study conducted in wild-type mice, AZM failed to affect the pulmonary clearance of P aeruginosa embedded in agar beads but dramatically reduced the cellular infiltrate in the lung, with a substantial reduction in neutrophil numbers.13 The disparity between these studies probably reflects methodological differences, not least the higher dose of AZM used in the former study (500 mg/kg vs 20 mg/kg) and the use of suspension rather than agar-embedded organisms which are more likely to promote biofilm production. Taken together, these studies indicate that AZM is able to antagonise bacterial virulence in the absence of a direct antibacterial effect; however, its beneficial effects in lung inflammation may not be restricted to modulating host-pathogen interactions. This view is supported by findings in mice homozygous for the ΔF508 mutation, where AZM reduced spontaneous and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory changes, suggesting that AZM may have direct effects on the immune system.14


Several studies have demonstrated the ability of macrolide antibiotics, including AZM, to modulate cytokine responses both in vitro and in vivo. AZM significantly reduced nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) expression, tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) mRNA levels and TNFα secretion in a CF-derived airway epithelial cell line.15 In mice treated with intraperitoneal LPS, AZM attenuated the increase in plasma TNFα and increased the survival in animals challenged with intravenous LPS.16 Together, these studies show that AZM can ameliorate the proinflammatory response to bacterial antigens. This conclusion is supported by work examining the role of AZM in the treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), which has demonstrated suppression of TNFα-stimulated NF-κB activation in tracheal aspirate cells from preterm infants with the reduction of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 production to control levels.17 Similarly, in an animal model of BPD, AZM caused decreased IL-6 production, less emphysematous change and improved survival.18 In a small double-blind randomised placebo controlled study in extremely premature infants, prophylaxis with AZM reduced postnatal steroid requirements and duration of mechanical ventilation, although the incidence of BDP and overall mortality were unaffected.19

IL-8 is an inflammatory chemokine which plays a major role in neutrophil recruitment in airway diseases. AZM reduces both IL-8 levels and airway neutrophilia in patients with BOS following lung transplantation,6 and there is interest in whether such an effect can be replicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis and “neutrophilic” asthma. AZM has also been shown to reduce IL-8 production by cultured airway epithelial and smooth muscle cells, perhaps as a result of suppression of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity.15 17 20 Administration of macrolide antibiotics including AZM to patients with nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis21 was found to reduce both polyp size and IL-8 levels in nasal lavage, again supporting an anti-inflammatory mechanism. However, under certain conditions AZM has been reported to have no effect or even to increase the release of proinflammatory cytokines. For example, a biphasic IL-8 response was demonstrated in a study using LPS-stimulated normal human bronchial epithelium cells in which AZM increased IL-8 release at 24–72 h with a return to control levels after 5 days of exposure.22 Overall, these studies demonstrate decreased synthesis and release of proinflammatory cytokines in response to prolonged treatment with AZM, with some studies additionally suggesting an initial transient proinflammatory effect. This polyphasic response to AZM could theoretically be helpful in conditions in which infection triggers a beneficial early response with enhancement of bactericidal activity and subsequent anti-inflammatory effects promoting the resolution of airway neutrophilia; it may also complement a similar facilitatory-then-inhibitory effect on neutrophil function as described below.


AZM accumulates selectively in phagocytic cells, particularly neutrophils and alveolar macrophages.23 The intracellular concentration of AZM within the neutrophil may be up to 2000-fold that in plasma, potentially favouring antibiotic delivery to phagocytosed bacteria.24 This could underlie enhanced intracellular killing of micro-organisms by AZM-treated neutrophils, although other mechanisms are possible.25 It has also been suggested that fibroblasts act as a tissue reservoir for the drug, and may even be involved in the transfer of AZM to phagocytic cells.26 The subsequent convergence of neutrophils at the site of active inflammation/infection may therefore act as a mechanism for delivering high concentrations of AZM to an inflammatory focus to exert its immunomodulatory and antimicrobial effects.

In addition to reducing the generation of neutrophil chemoattractants, AZM causes a significant reduction in the chemotactic response of both mouse and human neutrophils to chemokines (KC or IL-8) and bacterial-derived peptides (fMLP).13 This effect was mainly due to inhibition of the ERK-1/2 rather than PI3-kinase pathway. This “double hit” of inhibiting both chemoattractant generation and chemotactic responses may explain the pronounced reduction in airway neutrophilia reported in a range of pulmonary pathologies.6 7 13

Interesting but apparently contradictory data have been reported on the direct effects of AZM on neutrophil degranulation and oxidative burst responses. Neutrophils isolated from healthy volunteers treated with AZM exhibit enhanced, unaffected or suppressed respiratory burst activity depending on the stimulus and the time following dosage.27 28 For example, the responses to phorbol ester and opsonised zymosan particles were enhanced within hours following treatment but reduced after several days of AZM. Differential effects of AZM were also noted on degranulation, with evidence of an initial increase and subsequent decrease in the release of azurophil granules; however, serum elastase activity in healthy volunteers did not change over a 3-day period of AZM treatment.27

A study of isolated neutrophils treated with AZM in vitro did not recapitulate the effects of in vivo dosing on the oxidative burst, but instead found that AZM induced early neutrophil apoptosis.29 Likewise, in vivo dosing with AZM was found to increase marginally the number of apoptotic neutrophils detected in blood smears in healthy volunteers, an effect maximal 28 days after the last AZM dose.28 A further study examining isolated neutrophils after 24 h with AZM failed to demonstrate any effect on apoptosis, but in co-culture experiments employing A549 airway epithelial cells AZM reduced granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor release, causing an indirect reduction in neutrophil survival.30 Finally, ingestion of apoptotic neutrophils and apoptotic bronchial epithelial cells by alveolar macrophages has been reported to be enhanced by AZM;31 indeed, alveolar macrophages isolated from patients with COPD given AZM demonstrated enhanced phagocytic activity to apoptotic bronchial epithelial cells associated with increased expression of the mannose receptor.32 Studies on the effects of macrolides on the frequency of exacerbations in COPD are ongoing.33 These data suggest that AZM may modulate the cytokine environment to curtail neutrophil survival at inflammatory sites and, in addition, it acts to promote clearance of apoptotic cells. The effects of AZM on neutrophil accumulation and activation are summarised in fig 1.

Figure 1 Effects of azithromycin (AZM) on neutrophil accumulation and activation. AZM has the capacity to modulate the cascade of neutrophil recruitment, activation and disposal at several points including (1 and 2) the initial generation and response to chemokines, principally interleukin (IL)-8 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α; (3) direct bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects and enhanced intracellular killing of pathogens (supported by the intense concentration of AZM within neutrophils); (4) inhibition of quorum sensing and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other organisms; and (5) enhanced rates of neutrophil apoptosis and (5) enhanced phagocytic removal by alveolar macrophages.

Despite the above effects of AZM on immune cell function, there is only limited information on the intracellular mechanisms through which AZM might act. Several studies have suggested inhibition of the ERK/MAPK pathway leading to reduced IL-8 release from the bronchial epithelium, but the precise level and nature of this effect is uncertain. Other proposed mechanisms by which macrolides may impact on neutrophil signalling include altering intracellular calcium flux and impairing oxidant production due to the macrolide L-cladinose ring interfering with phospholipase D signalling.34 However, further studies are required to shed light on the precise biochemical mechanisms underlying the immunomodulatory effects of AZM.


The value of medications in chronic disease must always be balanced against the potential for toxicity. Because of the potential to induce cholestasis, AZM is contraindicated in the presence of significant hepatic impairment (which excludes many patients with CF from this treatment modality), and liver and renal function should be monitored. AZM has been reported to cause tinnitus and hearing loss, and audiometry plus advice to discontinue the medication in the event of an effect on hearing may be appropriate. True allergic reactions are rare but necessitate treatment withdrawal; gastrointestinal intolerance is common but may respond to dose reduction or the use of an oral suspension. The provision of long-term antibiotics raises the potential for selection of antibiotic-resistant organisms; of particular concern is the potential for patients with CF to become colonised with atypical mycobacterial species since macrolide resistance in this context is a major clinical and therapeutic problem. Regular screening of such patients for atypical mycobacteria is normal practice, and isolation of such organisms may lead either to the use of full antimycobacterial regimens or withdrawal of macrolide monotherapy.


The usefulness of AZM and other macrolides in treating chronic inflammatory lung disease is likely to reflect a broad spectrum of effects, including direct and indirect antibacterial activity, modulation of systemic and pulmonary cytokine profiles and an inhibitory effect on the over-exuberant innate immune response which characterises these conditions. Further clinical trials in conditions such as BOS, BPD, COPD and asthma are required; a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory properties of these versatile agents may help target appropriate patients for treatment and aid in the development of other immunomodulatory agents.


View Abstract


  • Funding: The work in the authors’ laboratory is funded by the MRC, the Wellcome Trust, Asthma UK, the British Lung Foundation, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge NIHR-Biomedical Research Centre and non-commercial grants from GSK and Astra-Zeneca.

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.