Statistics from Altmetric.com
Asthma is probably the most common potentially serious medical problem to complicate pregnancy. In recent national surveys in the USA, 8.4–8.8% of pregnant women reported current asthma.1 Since 1970, many published articles have suggested that women with asthma experience more complications of pregnancy than women who do not have asthma. The most commonly reported increased risks have been for pre-eclampsia,2–12 preterm birth2 5 6 8 9 13–15 and infants with low birth weight or intrauterine growth restriction.2 5 6 8–10 12 15 16The most severe complication of pregnancy from the infant standpoint is fetal or neonatal death. Although one study from the USA in 1970 reported a significant 80% increased risk of perinatal mortality in infants of women with asthma compared with those without asthma,17 and another study from Sweden in 1972 reported a more than doubling of neonatal mortality in infants of mothers with asthma,2 11 studies published between 1988 and 2007 did not demonstrate a significant increased risk of fetal mortality, neonatal mortality, or both (perinatal mortality) in the infants of women with asthma compared with women without asthma.3 7 10 15 16 18–23 Since the prevalence of perinatal mortality is fortunately low, a type 2 error due to low statistical power could explain many of these negative results. Indeed, sample sizes for women with asthma in 7 of the 11 negative studies were less than 2000.3 10 16 18–20 22 Moreover, a significant 21% increased risk of perinatal mortality was reported in the second largest cohort of women with asthma studied to date (n = 36 965).6
Against this background, the study by Breton et al24 in the current issue of Thorax (see page 101) of a database cohort of 13 100 pregnant women with asthma is important in shedding light on the important question: does maternal asthma confer an increased risk of the most severe fetal or infant adverse outcome of death? This large well-designed population-based study reported a 35% increased risk of perinatal mortality in the pregnancies of women with asthma. Moreover, this study is the first to demonstrate that this increased risk is probably mediated by an increased risk of low birthweight and preterm infants in the pregnancies of women with asthma. The study raises three major issues: (1) Is the association valid? (2) If the association is valid, what is the mechanism? (3) In light of this information, how should pregnant patients with asthma be managed so as to minimise the risk?
Regarding the validity of the association, there appear to be two issues. The first is the validity of the information captured in the database. The accuracy of exposures and outcomes is always an issue in studies using administrative computerised data. However, the computerised data used in this study have been validated with regard to both a diagnosis of asthma and birth weight and gestational age outcomes, and several databases were used to capture perinatal mortality. The second issue is whether the association identified in this study could be explained by unmeasured confounders. The main unmeasured factor that could definitely confound this relationship is maternal smoking, which has been reported to be increased in pregnant women with asthma compared with non-asthmatic women,6 10 25 26 and which has been clearly associated with increased perinatal mortality as well as with increased prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction.27–32 Several previous negative studies have adjusted for smoking,15 18 21–23 but the positive study from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry6 also adjusted for smoking. Thus, although adjustment for smoking in future studies would be highly desirable, smoking may not fully explain the current association. Another unmeasured potential confounder is maternal obesity, since obesity has been reported to be increased in pregnant women with asthma33 and obesity has been reported to increase the risk of intrauterine fetal death.34–37 However, an association between maternal obesity and preterm birth or low birthweight infants has not been established.37
Although confounding could contribute to the results of the study by Breton and coworkers,24 a biological association still seems likely. There are three possible types of mechanisms that could explain the increased risk of perinatal mortality in the pregnancies of women with asthma: (1) common pathogenesis factors; (2) medications used to treat asthma; and (3) uncontrolled asthma. Since prematurity and/or low birth weight seemed to mediate the relationship between asthma and perinatal mortality in the study by Breton et al, factors that could predispose to both asthma and these outcomes may be relevant. β2 Adrenergic receptors are present in both airway and uterine smooth muscle, and β2 adrenergic dysfunction could explain both bronchial hyper-reactivity and preterm labour. Consistent with this hypothesis, β2 agonists are used to treat both asthma and preterm labour. Most relevant is that two studies demonstrated bronchial hyper-reactivity in women without asthma who developed preterm labour.38 39 Common pathogenesis factors between asthma and pre-eclampsia may also be relevant since (1) pre-eclampsia has been reported to be more likely to occur in pregnant women with asthma than in those without asthma in many studies (see above), including the one by Breton et al; and (2) pre-eclampsia predisposes to preterm birth, low birth weight and fetal mortality.40 Certain mediators potentially important in pre-eclampsia such as angiotensin and endothelin are also potent bronchoconstrictors.41 42 Again, more compelling in this regard is the report of increased bronchial hyper-reactivity in women without asthma with pre-eclampsia compared with women without asthma who did not develop pre-eclampsia.43 Thus, there are data to suggest that asthma and conditions that predispose to perinatal mortality may be caused by similar pathogenesis factors, but more data are certainly required to confirm this mechanism. Moreover, this mechanism has less clearcut therapeutic implications than either a medication or uncontrolled asthma-mediated process.
Medications are frequently required to treat asthma, and thus an asthma medication effect must be considered. A recent study of women receiving asthma drugs during pregnancy did report a relationship between perinatal mortality and the use of three or more asthma medications compared with two or less asthma medications.15 However, this may have been an asthma severity effect, although associations between specific asthma medication groups or individual medications and perinatal mortality were not reported in that study. No associations have been demonstrated between maternal use of inhaled β agonists or inhaled corticosteroids and pre-eclampsia, preterm birth or low birthweight infants,44–49 although only one of these studies reported results for a component of perinatal mortality (stillbirth).45 In contrast, oral corticosteroids have been independently associated with lower birth weight,48 pre-eclampsia44 and prematurity.46 The study by Breton et al24 did not address a potential role for oral corticosteroids in mediating the observed relationship between maternal asthma and prematurity or perinatal mortality. However, residual confounding by asthma that is more difficult to control cannot be excluded in the above studies of oral corticosteroids.
An appealing mechanism for the association reported in the study by Breton et al is uncontrolled asthma, since asthma control is the goal of therapy in all patients with asthma. Although no studies have reported the relationships between parameters of asthma control and perinatal mortality, several studies have reported relationships between markers of asthma control and preterm birth, low birth weight or intrauterine growth retardation, which the data from the study by Breton et al suggest may mediate the increased risk of perinatal mortality in the pregnancies of women with asthma. In one study, daily asthma symptoms were significantly associated with intra-uterine growth restriction while symptoms less than daily were not.50 Inadequate asthma symptom control and exacerbations requiring hospitalisations were associated with an increased risk of preterm birth in infants of mothers with asthma in another study.51 Lower maternal pulmonary function in women with asthma during pregnancy has been associated with increased risks of preterm birth, low birthweight infants or intrauterine growth restriction in two studies.52 53 Finally, a meta-analysis has suggested that the increased risk of low birthweight infants of mothers with asthma is limited to those women who suffer asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.54 These observational data do not, of course, prove a cause and effect relationship between inadequate asthma control and these adverse perinatal outcomes or assure us that improved control will reduce the risk. However, since a randomised controlled intervention trial to identify the effect of controlled versus uncontrolled asthma on perinatal outcomes is not ethical, these observational data may be the best we can get to direct therapy.
Indeed, the most important question raised by the study of Breton et al is: What are the clinical and therapeutic implications, since it does appear that maternal asthma can be a life or death issue for the baby? The two main “take away” clinical points are: (1) appropriate surveillance and (2) optimal asthma control. Pregnancies in women with asthma need to be considered as high-risk pregnancies, with increased obstetrical surveillance for pre-eclampsia, preterm labour or delivery, intrauterine growth restriction and fetal mortality. Moreover, infants of women with asthma need to be followed for an increased risk of neonatal mortality, especially if preterm or of low birth weight. Regarding asthma control, as noted above although not proven, one would hope that optimal control of asthma during pregnancy would reduce the risk of perinatal complications including perinatal mortality. Supporting this hypothesis is the observation that the incidence of perinatal mortality, preterm birth and low birthweight infants was not increased in three relatively large prospective studies performed during the same time period as the study by Breton et al in which the asthma was actively managed by asthma specialists18 20 or perinatologists.22 Recent guidelines have been published for the management of asthma during pregnancy that should aid clinicians in providing optimal asthma control for their pregnant patients.55
In conclusion, although more data are clearly desirable, the study by Breton et al24 is an important addition to the body of literature published to date indicating that we need to manage our pregnant patients with asthma with the careful surveillance and control required of a life and death clinical situation.
Competing interests: None.