Simplified cell culture method for the diagnosis of atypical primary ciliary dyskinesia
- M Pifferi1,
- F Montemurro2,
- A M Cangiotti3,
- V Ragazzo1,
- M Di Cicco1,
- B Vinci2,
- G Vozzi2,
- P Macchia1,
- A L Boner4
- 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Pisa, Italy
- 2Interdepartmental Research Center “E. Piaggio”, Faculty of Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy
- 3Institute of Normal Human Morphology, Electron Microscopy Unit, Umberto I° Hospital, University of Ancona, Italy
- 4Department of Pediatrics, University of Verona, Italy
- Correspondence to Dr M Pifferi, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy; m.pifferi{at}med.unipi.it
- Received 11 November 2008
- Accepted 2 September 2009
- Published Online First 21 September 2009
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) can be challenging, and it may be particularly difficult to distinguish primary ciliary disease from the secondary changes after infections.
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate if nasal epithelial cells, obtained with nasal brushing instead of a biopsy, could be used in a culture system for the diagnosis of PCD in difficult cases.
Methods and main results: Ciliary motion analysis (CMA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were performed on 59 subjects with persistent or recurrent pneumonia. These investigations allowed the diagnosis of PCD in 13 (22%) patients while the defect of the cilia was considered secondary to infections in 37 (63%) subjects. In the remaining nine (15%) patients the diagnostic evaluation with CMA and TEM remained inconclusive. Ciliogenesis in culture allowed the diagnosis of PCD in four of these patients, it was indicative of a secondary defect in two subjects, and it was not helpful in the remaining three patients.
Conclusions: Culture of cells obtained with brushing of the nasal turbinate is not a perfect test, nevertheless it may offer diagnostic help in doubtful cases of PCD.
Footnotes
-
Funding Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pisa, Italy.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
-
Ethics approval Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Hospital Ethics Committee of Pisa.
-
▸ Additional methods and video clips are published online only at http://thorax.bmj.com/content/vol64/issue12









