Article Text

PDF

Ambulatory blood pressure in children with obstructive sleep apnoea: a community based study
  1. A M Li1,
  2. C T Au1,
  3. R Y T Sung1,
  4. C Ho2,
  5. P C Ng1,
  6. T F Fok1,
  7. Y K Wing2
  1. 1
    Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales and Shatin Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
  2. 2
    Department of Psychiatry, Prince of Wales and Shatin Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
  1. Dr A M Li, Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; albertmli{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Abstract

Background: Childhood obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is increasingly being recognised. Its effects on blood pressure (BP) elevation and hypertension are still controversial.

Objective: To evaluate the association between OSA and ambulatory BP in children.

Methods: Children aged 6–13 years from randomly selected schools were invited to undergo overnight sleep study and ambulatory BP monitoring after completing a validated OSA questionnaire. OSA was diagnosed if the obstructive apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) was >1, and normal controls had AHI <1 and snoring <3 nights per week. Children with OSA were subdivided into a mild group (AHI 1–5) and moderate to severe group (AHI >5).

Results: 306 subjects had valid sleep and daytime BP data. Children with OSA had significantly higher BP than normal healthy children during both sleep and wakefulness. BP levels increased with the severity of OSA, and children with moderate to severe disease (AHI >5) were at significantly higher risk for nocturnal systolic (OR 3.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.5)) and diastolic (OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.4 to 8.1)) hypertension. Multiple linear regression revealed a significant association between oxygen desaturation index and AHI with daytime and nocturnal BP, respectively, independent of obesity.

Conclusions: OSA was associated with elevated daytime and nocturnal BP, and is an independent predictor of nocturnal hypertension. This has important clinical implications as childhood elevated BP predicts future cardiovascular risks. Future studies should examine the effect of therapy for OSA on changes in BP.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

In adults, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for hypertension and is involved in the initiation and progression of other cardiovascular diseases.13 However, corresponding data for the paediatric population are scarce, and the few published studies have provided conflicting results.49 Marcus and colleagues4 suggested that children with OSA had higher daytime and nocturnal diastolic blood pressure (BP) compared with primary snorers, whereas Amin and colleagues5 found lower diastolic BP among children with OSA. Guilleminault and colleagues6 demonstrated that a subgroup of children with OSA were hypotensive rather than hypertensive. Kohyama and colleagues7 found a positive correlation between both nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP with severity of OSA and, similarly, Enright and colleagues8 found respiratory disturbance index to be significantly associated with systolic and diastolic BP. A recent study, however, failed to confirm such a positive association.9 These inconsistent findings in BP measurements might have been related to the small sample sizes and lack of normal healthy subjects for comparison. A recent meta-analysis concluded that there was inadequate evidence for an increased risk of elevated BP in children with OSA. The authors also found marked heterogeneity among published series and emphasised the need for further studies to clarify this important issue.10

In some of the reported paediatric series, casual “on the spot” BP measurements were used. Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurement is a better diagnostic tool as it gives more reliable and reproducible results.11 Obesity is becoming an important factor in the study of OSA. Obesity increases the risk of both OSA and cardiovascular disease for which hypertension is the preceding step. Failing to control for obesity will render assessment of the independent role of OSA on BP difficult.

In this study, we aimed to compare ABP parameters of children suffering from mild and moderate to severe OSA with normal healthy controls, and to investigate the correlation between severity of OSA and BP measures or hypertension, after adjusting for obesity.

METHODS

Subjects and study design

Subjects were aged between 6 and 13 years and were recruited from 13 randomly selected schools. Parents were asked to complete a validated OSA screening questionnaire12 that stratified children into high or low risk for OSA. All high risk and a randomly selected sample from the low risk group were invited to undergo overnight polysomnographic study (PSG) and ABP monitoring. Children were excluded if they had an intercurrent illness within 4 weeks of PSG, suffered from cardiac, renal or neuromuscular diseases, or if they had chromosomal abnormalities or had previously undergone upper airway surgery. Children receiving medications that could affect BP measurements were also excluded. Anthropometric parameters, including weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences were measured on the day of PSG. Body mass index (BMI) was converted to BMI z score, according to the normal reference.13 Children were defined as overweight or obese if their BMI z score was >1.04 or 1.65, corresponding to the 85th or 95th percentile (relative to age and gender), respectively. The study included the first 466 consecutive children who consented to PSG and ABP recordings.

Subjects were classified into three groups according to the PSG and questionnaire results.

  • Group 1: healthy control group (obstructive apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) <1 and history of snoring <3 nights per week).

  • Group 2: mild OSA group (AHI 1–5).

  • Group 3: moderate to severe OSA (AHI >5).

Subjects with primary snoring (AHI <1, history of snoring >3 nights per week) were not included in the study.

Polysomnography

All recruited children underwent a standard overnight PSG at a dedicated sleep laboratory with a CNS 1000P polygraph (CNS, Inc., Chanhassen, Minnesota, USA), as described in our previous publication.14 All computerised sleep data were further manually edited by experienced PSG technologists and clinicians according to standard criteria.15 For definitions of PSG parameters, please refer to our online supplementary file.

Ambulatory blood pressure measurement

ABP was monitored on the same day as overnight PSG using an oscillometric monitor (SpaceLabs 90217; SpaceLabs Medical, Redmond, Washington, USA), which has been validated for use in children.16 Subjects arrived at the sleep laboratory at 14:00 on the day of PSG, and ABP recordings began at arrival until the subjects were discharged home the next day. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial BP were measured hourly during the period starting from 21:30 to 07:00, and every 30 min outside of this period. The correct size cuff was placed on the non-dominant arm. The exact cut-off time dividing wake and sleep BP was defined individually according to the PSG tracings. Recordings were included in the analysis when they had a minimum of seven successful readings during active wakefulness and at least seven successful readings during sleep.16 Individual mean systolic, diastolic and mean arterial BP were calculated for wake and sleep periods. All mean BP variables were converted into BP z scores using the “LMS” reference values (relative to gender and height) published by Wuhl and colleagues.17 In brief, the authors had derived height and gender specific estimates of the distribution median (M), coefficient of variation (S) and degree of skewness (L), which were estimated by a maximum likelihood of curve fitness technique.18 These estimated parameters were used to transform the skewed data to normality, giving a more accurate ABP z score. Elevated BP and hypertension were defined as mean BP values >90th and 95th percentiles of the ABP reference, respectively.17

Nocturnal dipping of systolic BP, diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure were derived by calculating the difference between mean awake BP and mean sleep BP and expressed as a percentage of mean awake BP. Subjects with nocturnal BP dipping less than 10% were defined as non-dippers.19 20

Statistical analysis

Mean (SD), median (interquartile range) and number (percentage) are presented for parametric, non-parametric and categorical data, respectively. Parametric and non-parametric data were compared using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal–Wallis test, respectively. For parametric data, the Tukey or Games–Howell method was used for post hoc pairwise comparisons with adjustments made depending on the agreement of the assumption of variance. For non-parametric data, Mann–Whitney tests with adjusted p values (significant at p<0.016) were used for pairwise comparisons. As some of the polysomnographic data were skewed and contained zero or extreme values, these variables were logarithmically transformed (natural log [x +0.1]). χ2 tests were performed to investigate the difference in proportions between groups. Multiple χ2 tests with adjusted p values (significant at p<0.016) were used for multiple pairwise comparisons.

Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between polysomnographic variables and BP measures, while controlling for possible confounders.

Logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of different forms of hypertension (systolic or diastolic hypertension during wake or sleep) for different severities of OSA compared with normal controls, while adjusting for possible confounding factors. All analyses were performed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for Windows V.13.0.

RESULTS

Subject characteristics

A total of 619 subjects were admitted for PSG but only 466 completed the BP recording. This was because there were four subjects admitted for PSG every working day but our unit only had three BP recording machines. Three out of the four subjects were thus randomly selected for recording and none of them refused.

Of the 466 subjects who underwent both PSG and ABP recording, 118 children were classified as primary snorers and were excluded. Forty-two subjects were also excluded as their BP recording did not satisfy our minimal criteria for success. As a result, 306 subjects were included in the final analysis. The demographic, anthropometric and PSG characteristics are presented in table 1. Compared with normal controls and subjects with a lower AHI, the group with AHI >5 included a larger proportion of boys with higher BMI z score. As expected, subjects with higher AHI values also had significantly higher oxygen desaturation index, arousal index and lower oxygen haemoglobin saturation nadir.

Table 1 Demographic, anthropometric and polysomnographic data

Characteristics of ambulatory blood pressure measurement

There was no significant difference in the characteristics of ABP recording between groups. The median (IQR) total recording time for all subjects was 16.5 (15.0–22.9). The median (IQR) number of BP readings during wakefulness and sleep were 13 (10–20) and 9 (8–9) respectively (table 1 of the online supplement).

Selection of seven BP readings during sleep was based on the recommendation of the European Society of Hypertension.18 Many of our subjects did not comply with the recommendation for daytime BP recording because of schooling and other social commitments. The selection of seven daytime readings was arbitrary and we had analysed our data to verify that this selection was valid and representative. Subjects with at least 14 successful daytime BP readings were selected, and comparisons were made between the average daytime BP levels of the entire recording and the average levels of the first seven readings. There were 138 subjects with at least 14 successful daytime readings and there were no significant differences between the overall BP averages and the averages of the first seven readings (see table 2 of the online supplement). Based on these data, we believed that seven successful daytime BP recordings were representative.

Table 2 Group comparison of blood pressure measures

Blood pressure during wakefulness

Post hoc pairwise comparison showed that the moderate to severe OSA group had significantly higher wake systolic (WSBP), diastolic (WDBP) and mean arterial BP (WMAP) than both the normal control and the mild OSA group, while no significant differences were found between the normal and the mild group (fig 1). The same results were obtained after converting the wake BP parameters into z scores (adjusting for gender and height). Furthermore, the moderate to severe group included a significantly greater proportion of subjects having elevated WSBP (table 2). In the logistic regression analyses adjusted for only age and gender, subjects with moderate to severe OSA had a higher odds ratio for elevated WSBP compared with normal controls (OR 3.94 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.49 to 10.43)). However, once adjusted for BMI and waist circumference, the significant difference in the risk of elevated WSBP was no longer demonstrated (OR 2.12 (95% CI 0.73 to 6.13)) (see table 3 of the online supplement).

Figure 1 Systolic (A) and diastolic (B) blood pressure (BP) during wakefulness and sleep in different groups. Values are mean (95% CI). *Post-hoc test, p<0.05, normal group vs mild obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) group; †post-hoc test, p<0.05, normal group vs moderate to severe OSA group; ‡post-hoc test, p<0.05, mild OSA group vs moderate to severe OSA group.
Table 3 Multiple linear regression analyses showing the association between polysomnographic parameters and daytime blood pressure parameters before and after adjustment for possible confounders

Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the associations between polysomnographic parameters and WSBP or WMAP were partially explained by BMI and waist circumference, whereas the associations with WDBP were only slightly confounded by BMI and waist circumference. Oxygen desaturation index had the strongest association with wake BP measures (table 3).

Blood pressure during sleep

One way ANOVA showed that subjects with moderate to severe OSA had significantly higher sleep systolic BP (SSBP), sleep diastolic BP (SDBP) and sleep mean arterial BP (SMAP) compared with controls (fig 1). This finding remained the same after converting the sleep BP parameters into z scores (adjusting for gender and height). Furthermore, compared with controls and those with lower AHI values, subjects with AHI >5 included a significantly greater proportion of subjects with sleep systolic and diastolic hypertension (table 2).

In the logistic regression analyses adjusted for age and gender, subjects with AHI >5 had approximately 5 times and 3.5 times higher risk for sleep systolic (OR 5.0 (95% CI 2.0 to 12.7)) and diastolic (OR 3.5 (95% CI 1.5 to 8.1)) hypertension, respectively, compared with healthy controls. The ORs were reduced to 3.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.5) and 3.3 (95% CI 1.4 to 8.1), respectively, after adding BMI and waist circumference into the model. In contrast, for the group with AHI between 1 and 5, no significant increased risk for hypertension or elevated BP was found compared with the healthy controls (see table 3 of the online supplement).

Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the association between polysomnographic parameters and SSBP or SMAP were partially explained by BMI and waist circumference whereas the associations between SDBP and polysomnographic parameters were not significantly affected by BMI and waist circumference. AHI had the strongest association with elevated nocturnal BP (table 4).

Table 4 Multiple linear regression analyses showing the association between polysomnographic parameters and nocturnal blood pressure parameters before and after adjustment for possible confounders

Nocturnal BP dipping

No significant differences in nocturnal BP dipping and proportion of non-dippers were identified between the three groups (table 2).

Subgroup analysis of non-overweight children

To further verify that the effect of OSA on BP elevation was independent of obesity, subgroup analyses were performed after excluding overweight subjects (BMI greater than the 85th percentile specific for age and gender). There were no significant differences in BMI, BMI z score or waist circumference between the different groups (table 5).

Table 5 Blood pressure measurements of non-overweight subjects

Across the groups, significant increasing trends were identified for all BP measurements during sleep. Significant differences in mean arterial pressure, systolic BP z score and mean arterial pressure z score were found between controls and those with mild OSA but not between the moderate to severe group and the controls. The latter might be because of the small number of subjects in the moderate to severe group. For daytime parameters, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure and diastolic BP z score had significant increasing trends across groups. Significant differences in diastolic BP and its z score were identified between the moderate to severe group and controls.

DISCUSSION

Our study has provided robust evidence that children with OSA had significantly higher BP than normal healthy children during both sleep and wakefulness. BP levels increased with the severity of OSA, and children with moderate to severe disease (AHI >5) were at significantly higher risk for nocturnal hypertension. The effect of childhood OSA on BP levels was independent of the effect of obesity. These findings have important clinical implications as the current literature suggests elevated childhood BP mediates adulthood hypertension and metabolic syndrome.21 In addition, elevated BP during childhood is associated with increased carotid artery intima–media thickness, which precedes the development of atherosclerosis.22

Both daytime systolic and diastolic BP were found to be significantly higher in children with moderate to severe OSA compared with those with mild disease and healthy controls. Although statistically insignificant, there was a trend in the same direction for both daytime systolic and diastolic hypertension. This is a novel and important finding as childhood BP could determine future adverse cardiovascular problems. Two previous paediatric studies using ambulatory BP recording failed to show results similar to ours. Amin and colleagues5 evaluated 60 snoring children and found lower daytime diastolic BP in children with more severe OSA (AHI >5). The investigators suggested that such a finding was a reflection of abnormal elastic recoil of blood vessels during diastole. Casual BP instead of ABP normal references were used in Amin’s study and that could have given rise to inappropriate BP interpretation.23 A more recent study also failed to provide support for daytime BP elevation in children with OSA.9 The study included only 17 cases with severe OSA and did not have a normal control group for comparison.

Our current study documented higher nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP in children with moderate to severe OSA compared with healthy subjects. In addition, the same group of children also had a significantly higher prevalence of nocturnal systolic and diastolic hypertension. Children with AHI >5 had an odds ratio of 3.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.5) and 3.3 (1.4 to 8.1) for nocturnal systolic and diastolic hypertension, respectively. Another important finding is demonstration of significant differences in nocturnal systolic and mean arterial BP between children with mild OSA and normal controls. Such differences in BP measures were not seen in the daytime recording. This may suggest nocturnal BP in children is more liable to elevation as a result of OSA compared with wake BP. A similar finding was also reported in adults where nocturnal hypertension was the more frequent pattern of hypertension seen in patients with newly diagnosed OSA.24 This emphasises the importance of nocturnal rather than daytime BP measurement in children suspected of having sleep apnoea.

The effect size of OSA severity on BP levels was small, which could be explained by the community based recruitment of our subjects. A recent paediatric study25 found that a fully adjusted beta coefficient of log transformed AHI on nocturnal systolic BP of 0.5 was associated with significant left ventricular abnormalities, which are important markers of future cardiovascular adverse events.26 27 Therefore, our findings of elevated BP, although small, would still have important and relevant long term health implications.

Non-dipping BP has been associated with hypertensive target organ damage.28 We failed to find any significant differences in non-dipping BP profile between the three groups. In contrast, Amin and colleagues5 documented a significantly greater proportion of subjects with moderate to severe OSA as having non-dipping BP. This discrepancy could be explained by the more severe OSA status and a greater proportion of obese children being included in their study.

Repetitive arousals and recurrent hypoxic events caused by intermittent airway occlusion are proposed mechanisms linking OSA and systemic hypertension.29 Both mechanisms are thought to mediate sympathetic activation that may overspill into the day leading to hypertension during the day. Our findings showed that of these two mechanisms, nocturnal hypoxaemia was more closely associated with daytime BP elevation while recurrent arousals, resulting in sleep fragmentation, was more closely related to the increase in nocturnal BP. Our results were also consistent with a previous adult study which suggested that nocturnal hypoxaemia was associated with sympathetic activation that spilled over at least into the first hour after waking up and caused daytime hypertension.30 A canine model of OSA documented sustained daytime hypertension after dogs were exposed to recurrent apnoeas. However, such BP changes were not seen when the animals were exposed to recurrent arousals only.31

One of the limitations of our study was the low compliance for a full 24 h BP recording. Many of our subjects were unwilling to comply with monitoring over a 24 h period because of school or other social commitments, a problem commonly encountered in paediatric research. Nonetheless, all of our sleep BP measurements satisfied the criteria needed for adequate ABP monitoring,16 and the seven daytime readings were proven to be representative. Ambulatory normal data from a German cohort was used in our study, as local reference values were not available. As a result, the blood pressure z score and the 90th and 95th percentiles may be subjected to racial errors and should be interpreted with caution. Our study, however, has major advantages over other published paediatric series. Firstly, and most importantly, our study included the largest sample size to date reported in the literature. In addition, we also included a normal healthy control group for comparison. Primary snorers used by other studies as controls were inappropriate as a previous publication documented higher BP in primary snorers than in non-snorers.32 We avoided sampling bias by recruiting subjects from the community instead of from hospital attendants. This would have minimised bias or other unknown factors that influence referral to hospital clinics. Lastly, we used ambulatory measurements rather than casual readings to provide a more reliable evaluation of BP changes.11

CONCLUSION

BP levels during both wakefulness and sleep increased with the severity of childhood OSA. Children with more severe disease (AHI >5) were at increased risk of nocturnal hypertension. These findings are clinically relevant and important as high BP is a well established risk factor for future adverse cardiovascular events, and children with OSA are thus predisposed to such a risk. Therefore, children with symptoms suggestive of OSA should be investigated early, and future studies should examine the effect of therapy for OSA on BP changes.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the logistic support of all the staff of the Sleep Assessment Unit at Shatin Hospital, and the cooperation and participation of all the schools, children and their parents.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • ▸ Additional tables are available in a supplement published online only at http://thorax.bmj.com/content/vol63/issue9

  • Funding: This study was supported by grant (CUHK4161/02M) from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.