rss
Thorax 62:219-223 doi:10.1136/thx.2006.066837
  • Asthma

External validity of randomised controlled trials in asthma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?

  1. Justin Travers1,
  2. Suzanne Marsh1,
  3. Mathew Williams1,
  4. Mark Weatherall2,
  5. Brent Caldwell1,
  6. Philippa Shirtcliffe1,
  7. Sarah Aldington1,
  8. Richard Beasley3
  1. 1Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. 2Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wellington, New Zealand
  3. 3University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor R Beasley
    Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, PO Box 10055, Wellington, New Zealand; richard.beasley{at}mrinz.ac.nz
  • Received 12 June 2006
  • Accepted 9 October 2006
  • Published Online First 14 November 2006

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with a wide range of clinical phenotypes, not all of which may be encompassed in the subjects included in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This makes it difficult for clinicians to know to what extent the evidence derived from RCTs applies to a given patient.

Aim: To calculate the proportion of individuals with asthma who would have been eligible for the major asthma RCTs from the data of a random community survey of respiratory health.

Methods: A postal survey was sent to 3500 randomly selected individuals aged 25–75 years. Respondents were invited to complete a detailed respiratory questionnaire and pulmonary function testing. Participants with current asthma were assessed against the eligibility criteria of the 17 major asthma RCTs cited in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines.

Findings: A total of 749 participants completed the full survey, of whom 179 had current asthma. A median 4% of participants with current asthma (range 0–36%) met the eligibility criteria for the included RCTs. A median 6% (range 0–43%) of participants with current asthma on treatment met the eligibility criteria.

Interpretation: This study shows that the major asthma RCTs on which the GINA guidelines are based may have limited external validity as they have been performed on highly selected patient populations. Most of the participants with current asthma on treatment in the community would not have been eligible for these RCTs.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 13 November 2006

  • Funding: The Wellington Respiratory Survey was funded by GlaxoSmithKline UK.

  • Competing interests: Richard Beasley is a member of the GINA Assembly.