You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 61, Issue 1
  • Differences in radiological/HRCT findings in eosinophilic bronchitis and asthma: implication for bronchial responsiveness

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Asthma
Differences in radiological/HRCT findings in eosinophilic bronchitis and asthma: implication for bronchial responsiveness
Free
  1. S-W Park1,
  2. J-S Park1,
  3. Y-M Lee2,
  4. J-H Lee2,
  5. A-S Jang2,
  6. D-J Kim2,
  7. Y Hwangbo2,
  8. S-T Uh2,
  9. Y-H Kim2,
  10. C-S Park2
  1. 1Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul, Cheonan and Bucheon Hospital, Korea
  2. 2Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Division of Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Soonchunhyang University Seoul, Cheonan and Bucheon Hospital, Korea
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr C-S Park
    Division of Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon Gyeonggi Do 420-021, Republic of Korea; mdcspark{at}unitel.co.kr

Abstract

Background: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatics is considered to be one of the major consequences of airway inflammation and remodelling. Airway responsiveness is normal in patients with eosinophilic bronchitis (EB), despite eosinophilic inflammation of the airways comparable to that which occurs in asthmatics. Comparisons between asthma and EB should clarify the changes in airway morphology that are related specifically to AHR in asthmatics.

Methods: Eighteen asthmatic patients, 15 patients with EB, and 11 healthy subjects were recruited. Airway wall area percentage (WA%), centrilobular prominence, and air trapping were compared using thin slice section computed tomography.

Results: WA% was significantly greater in asthmatics than in patients with EB (72 (3.1)% v 54 (2.1)%, p = 0.032) and was similar in EB patients and controls (54 (2.1)% v 57 (1.8)%, p>0.05). Centrilobular prominence and air trapping were similar in EB patients and asthmatics and were significantly greater than in controls.

Conclusion: WA% rather than air trapping or centrilobular prominence may be associated with the airway hyperresponsiveness that occurs in asthmatics but not in patients with EB.

  • AHR, airway hyperresponsiveness
  • EB, eosinophilic bronchitis
  • FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second
  • FVC, forced vital capacity
  • WA%, airway wall area percentage
  • asthma
  • eosinophilic bronchitis
  • high resolution computed tomography
  • airway hyperresponsiveness

https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2005.044420

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Published Online First 21 October 2005

    • S-WP and J-SP contributed equally to this work.

    • This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (01-PJ10-PG6-01GN14-0003).

    • Competing interests: none declared.

    Linked Articles

    • Airwaves
      Airwaves
      Wisia Wedzicha
      Thorax 2006; 61 1-1 Published Online First: 05 Jan 2006. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.awjan06