rss
Thorax 60:433-436 doi:10.1136/thx.2004.037267
  • Occasional review

Asbestos, asbestosis, and lung cancer: a critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence

Table 2

 Epidemiological studies suggesting that lung cancer can be attributed to asbestos exposure without radiographic evidence of asbestosis

Reference Study design Subjects Main findings
RR, relative risk; SMR, standardised mortality ratio.
*See also Anttila et al.7
Martischnig4 Case-referent 201 cases of lung cancer without asbestosis;201 age/sex/area-matched hospital referents Increased odds ratio at all levels of smoking for history of asbestos exposure
Liddell5 Cohort mortality 4559 chrysotile miners and millers with chest x ray Of 52 excess cases of lung cancer, 33 showed no small opacities; 3-fold RR of cases with compared with those without small opacities
Karjalainen6* Case-referent 108 lung cancer patients with and without asbestosis Lower lobe tumours predominate even in absence of fibrosis
Hillerdal8 Cohort mortality 1596 men with pleural plaques identified in health surveys, 1970–85 RR for lung cancer increased significantly in men with and without small opacities (1.6 v 1.4)
Wilkinson9 Case-referent 271 cases of lung cancer and 678 hospital referents RR for lung cancer increased significantly in men with and without small opacities
Finkelstein10 Cohort mortality 143 Ontario asbestos cement workers,20 with asbestosis Lung cancer SMR for men with asbestosis 9.96 (95% CI 2.71 to 25.5); without 5.53 (2.86 to 9.66)
de Klerk11 Cohort mortality;case-referent analysis 55 cases of lung cancer and 841 referents for a cohort of 6910 Australian crocidolite miners Significantly increased RR for lung cancer in subjects with and without asbestosis

This Article


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.