rss
Thorax 2005;60:199-205 doi:10.1136/thx.2004.029041
  • Asthma

Involvement in treatment decisions: what do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey

  1. A-L Caress1,
  2. K Beaver1,
  3. K Luker1,
  4. M Campbell1,
  5. A Woodcock2
  1. 1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
  2. 2North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr A-L Caress
    School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; ann.caressmanchester.ac.uk
  • Received 22 May 2004
  • Accepted 14 October 2004

Abstract

Background: Current healthcare policy advocates patient participation in treatment decision making. However, in asthma there is little evidence regarding patients’ views on such involvement. This study explored the preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decisions, rationales for role preference, perceived facilitators of/barriers to involvement, and the interrelationship of role preference and demographic variables in a sample of patients with asthma.

Methods: A cross sectional survey was performed of 230 adults with clinician diagnosed asthma from 10 primary care sites and one specialist respiratory centre in north-west England. Preferred role in treatment decisions was assessed using the Control Preferences Scale.

Results: Fifty five (23.9%) preferred an active role, 82 (35.7%) a collaborative role, and 93 (40.4%) a passive role; 19 (8.2%) perceived their role as active compared with 45 (19.6%) collaborative and 166 (72.2%) passive. Only 33.5% (n = 77) of respondents attained their most preferred role; 55.2% (n = 127) were less involved than they preferred. Patient related, professional related, and organisational factors, especially quality and duration of consultations, facilitated or hampered involvement. Role preferences were not strongly associated with demographic variables or asthma severity.

Conclusions: This study in patients with asthma highlights the fact that there is a need for professional and patient education regarding partnership working, skilful communication, and innovative approaches to service delivery.

Footnotes

  • This project was funded through the NHS National R&D Programme on Asthma Management (Grant Number AM2/10/059) and administered by the National Asthma Campaign (now Asthma UK). The views expressed are those of the authors. The support of both of agencies is gratefully acknowledged, as is the generous contribution of the study sites and participants.

  • Conflict of interest: none for any author

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Thorax. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.