Background: Bulky endobronchial tumours in patients with lung cancer are difficult to treat. Brachytherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are variably effective, and the combination of these treatments is not often recommended. However, cell culture studies and animal studies indicate a possible synergistic effect of combining PDT with ionising radiation. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of combined brachytherapy and PDT in patients with bulky endobronchial lung cancer.
Methods: Patients with histologically proven non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma and bulky endobronchial tumours were treated using a combination of PDT (Photofrin, 2 mg/kg) and brachytherapy. Six weeks after PDT, brachytherapy was applied with five fractions of 4 Gy at weekly intervals. Follow up was performed with standard and autofluorescence bronchoscopy and tissue biopsies every 3 months.
Results: Thirty two patients were treated. Tumours were extensive with lengths ranging from 10 to 60 mm along the bronchus and estimated volumes ranging from 40 to 3500 mm3. At a mean follow up of 24 months, 26 patients were free of residual tumour and local recurrence. The remaining patients received a second treatment with PDT, brachytherapy, Nd:YAG laser coagulation, or external beam radiation. Distant metastases (lung, lymph node) developed in two of the six patients. Currently, all 32 patients are well. There is no evidence of residual or local recurrent endobronchial cancer in 28 patients and none had severe complications.
Conclusion: The combination of PDT and brachytherapy for treating patients with lung cancer and extensive endobronchial tumour is safe and, in this study, had excellent therapeutic efficacy.
- lung cancer
- photodynamic therapy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Bronchogenic carcinoma is the most common cancer in the United States and Europe. Many patients suffer from marked endobronchial obstruction, either as a presenting symptom or as a recurrence of their malignancy. If the tumours are inoperable, various palliative treatments are usually pursued. Local treatment options are Nd:YAG laser coagulation, cryotherapy, electrocautery, brachytherapy, and photodynamic therapy (PDT).1 Nd:YAG laser resection is the most common method of clearing the airways from exophytic bulky tumours. Photodynamic therapy has emerged as an alternative, with a slower but longer lasting effect.2,3 Its use is considered to be limited to superficial tumours with limited mass and extension.4 Intramural and peribronchial tumour growth can be managed by brachytherapy. In two studies we have reported prolonged survival with endobronchial high dose brachytherapy5 and good responses to PDT in cases of postoperative cancer recurrence.6 We postulated that combining PDT and brachytherapy could improve local tumour control and survival in patients with bulky endobronchial tumours. At the same time, we aimed to assess the safety of combining these treatments.
Patients with technically inoperable primary bronchogenic carcinoma and patients with recurrent lung cancer in the airways were eligible for inclusion. Tumours had to be limited to the airways, without evidence of other chest or metastatic disease; otherwise, external beam radiation or chemotherapy would have been pursued. Primary radiation therapy of the airways is not uniformly successful, and therefore we believed that offering alternative therapeutic approaches to an individual patient, such as the one proposed in this study, was ethical. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and written informed patient consent was obtained in all cases. Patients were followed prospectively to assess the feasibility and results of this approach.
After routine clinical tests including CT scans, all patients underwent standard bronchoscopy with conventional white light and autofluorescence examination. Biopsy specimens were taken from the tumour and sites proximal and distal to the neoplasm to confirm the diagnosis and tumour margins histologically. Tumour extensions were noted as visible length, width, and height over the bronchial surface level. Tumour volume was estimated as the cubic product of these three values.
Photofrin (QLT Pharmaceuticals, Susteren, The Netherlands, or Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen, Germany) was injected intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg body weight. Patients were instructed to avoid exposure to direct sunlight for 4–6 weeks. Bronchoscopic examination with light activation of the drug was performed 48 hours after injection.
Red light was generated with an argon pumped dye laser (Lambda Plus, Coherent, Palo Alto) or a diode laser (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) adjusted to 630 nm. Optical fibres (400 µm) with cylindrical diffusers ranging from 1 to 3 cm long or microlens fibres were used to debulk the tumours. Tumour tissue was either impaled with the diffuser fibre for interstitial illumination or irradiated on the surface with the help of microlens fibres. Red light was applied at 200 J/cm for interstitial treatment or at 100 J/cm2 for surface treatment. Forty eight hours after the first illumination another bronchoscopic examination was performed for debridement and re-evaluation. If indicated, another illumination with 100 J/cm (or 50 J/cm2) was applied. Therapeutic bronchoscopies were performed two or three times, depending on the tissue reaction.
Biopsy specimens were taken from the treated sites during bronchoscopy 5–6 weeks after PDT and high dose brachytherapy with iridium-192 was administered. A catheter (4 mm outside diameter) was introduced using the Seldinger technique with flexible bronchoscopy under local anaesthesia. If a carina was involved, two catheters were placed. A dose of 4 Gy, calculated at a distance of 10 mm from the source axis, was applied. Brachytherapy was repeated five times at weekly intervals until a total dose of 20 Gy had been administered.
Follow up bronchoscopic examinations were performed every 3 months. Biopsy specimens of the treatment areas were examined by the same pathologist who examined the initial specimens. If tumour recurrence was noted, patients received additional local treatment.
Outcomes were the presence or absence of tumour as indicated by bronchoscopic inspection and histological analysis.
Between April 1995 and November 1998, 32 patients with technically inoperable (n = 15) or recurrent (n = 17) bronchogenic carcinomas were treated sequentially with PDT and brachytherapy (table 1). All tumours were functionally or technically unresectable. The tumours were limited to the bronchial wall and other metastatic disease was not evident.
Complete response was achieved in 24 patients (75%) after initial PDT, as indicated by negative histological results in multiple biopsy specimens from the original tumour site (table 1). In one patient squamous cell carcinoma cells were still found after brachytherapy; in all other patients the biopsy specimens became negative after brachytherapy. Thus, the combined treatment had a complete histological response rate of 97% (31/32). The remaining patient received additional brachytherapy with 8 Gy. Although the tumour is still present, he is alive and well 37 months after initial treatment.
Cancer recurred in six patients (19%) at 6, 9, 11, 12, 24, and 26 months after PDT (table 2). Five neoplasms were found at the original site. In one patient recurrence developed 2 cm distal to the original tumour. Using external beam radiation, brachytherapy, Nd:YAG laser coagulation, or additional PDT, tumours were eradicated in three of these six patients. In one patient pulmonary parenchymal metastasis was found 11 months after PDT, and in another patient lymph node metastasis was detected after 3 months. Both patients were successfully treated with external beam radiation and no tumour cells were found in the bronchus. At present, all 32 patients are alive and well after a mean follow up period of 24 months (range 3–46).
There were no severe complications such as haemoptysis, fistulas, or post-obstructive pneumonia. As expected, temporary mucosal swelling occurred in most cases. Necrotic tissue and fibrin commonly accumulated during the first week after PDT but were always easily cleared by bronchoscopy. Moderate scarring of the bronchus 2–3 months after treatment was usually observed in the radiated bronchial segment. None of the obstructions was severe enough to require intervention.
The patients were well informed about light protection and none experienced sunburn.
Photodynamic therapy with Photofrin is safe and effective,2–4,6–9 but high efficacy has only been found when the tumour is smaller than 10 mm in diameter. Above this critical size the response rate falls from 98% to 43%.4 Other factors determining the outcome are submucosal invasion and peribronchial extension.10 Underestimating the extent of the tumour and undertreatment have been identified as reasons for treatment failure.11
Brachytherapy is also a well established method of palliation and works well in combination with Nd:YAG laser photoresection to control local tumour growth.5,12 It is also effective in eradicating early cancer.13
Cell culture studies and animal studies indicate a possible synergistic effect of combining PDT with ionising radiation.14,15 Both result in tumour cell apoptosis but probably via different pathways.16 Other studies combining PDT and external beam radiation do not indicate a higher risk of complications.17,18
Theoretically, the order of treatment could be reversed, starting with brachytherapy and applying PDT later. However, ionising radiation affects tissue vascularisation. The impaired perfusion of the tumour might result in a lower uptake of the sensitiser, possibly compromising the effect of PDT.
We treated only patients whose tumours were inoperable, either for technical or functional reasons or because of recurrence after surgery. Also, all of our patients had a substantial tumour burden in the tracheobronchial tree. The prognosis for these patients is poor. The results in our study were surprisingly good, with a response rate of 97%. All patients are alive after a mean of 24 months, and the combined treatment failed to eradicate the tumour in only one patient. Relapse occurred at the treated site in five patients, and most of these tumours were successfully treated locally. Also encouraging is the fact that no serious side effects were observed during this aggressive treatment protocol.
Our main interest in this descriptive study was to acquire initial data regarding the feasibility and efficacy of this regimen. As a result, we did not use a randomised trial design. However, our results are extremely encouraging for these difficult to treat patients and we believe that further controlled trials of this treatment regimen are warranted.
We conclude that, in this carefully selected patient population, aggressive combined treatment with PDT and brachytherapy is safe and efficacious in achieving local tumour control.